Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change

Floods that cause yearly economic losses and casualties have increased in frequency with global warming. Assessing the mortality risks of populations due to flooding is important and necessary for risk management and disaster reduction. Thus, this paper develops a method for assessing global mortali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junlin Zhang, Wei Xu, Xinli Liao, Shuo Zong, Baoyin Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abff87
_version_ 1797747694251278336
author Junlin Zhang
Wei Xu
Xinli Liao
Shuo Zong
Baoyin Liu
author_facet Junlin Zhang
Wei Xu
Xinli Liao
Shuo Zong
Baoyin Liu
author_sort Junlin Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Floods that cause yearly economic losses and casualties have increased in frequency with global warming. Assessing the mortality risks of populations due to flooding is important and necessary for risk management and disaster reduction. Thus, this paper develops a method for assessing global mortality risks due to river flooding. Global historical annual death tolls are first estimated during the historical period 1986–2005 (T _0 ) by using available mortality vulnerability functions of river flooding. Then, the best vulnerability function is selected according to lower root mean square errors (RMSE) and the differences in the multi-year mean (DMYM) values. Next, the adjustment coefficient K _c for each country (region) is calculated to use in the revision of the selected vulnerability function. Finally, the mortality risks are estimated based on an adjusted vulnerability function. As a case, the paper assessed and analysed the global mortality risks due to river flooding during 2016–2035 (2030s) and 2046–2065 (2050s) for the combined scenario of the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) and the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2 (SSP2), and the RCP8.5-SSP5 scenario. The results show that the estimation errors of the death tolls in most countries (regions) decrease after adjusting the vulnerability function. Under the current defense capacity and vulnerability level, the average annual death tolls of RCP4.5-SSP2 and RCP8.5-SSP5 in the 2030s will increase by 1.05 times and 0.93 times compared with the historical period. They will increase 1.89 and 2.20 times, respectively for the two scenarios during 2050s. High-risk areas are distributed in the south-eastern Eurasia.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:54:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed172cf268ba4b899bf7da1022ae4c93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:54:11Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-ed172cf268ba4b899bf7da1022ae4c932023-08-09T15:00:57ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262021-01-0116606403610.1088/1748-9326/abff87Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate changeJunlin Zhang0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-3549Wei Xu1Xinli Liao2Shuo Zong3Baoyin Liu4Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Emergency Management and Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of ChinaKey Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Emergency Management and Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of ChinaKey Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Emergency Management and Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of ChinaKey Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Emergency Management and Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of ChinaInstitutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of ChinaFloods that cause yearly economic losses and casualties have increased in frequency with global warming. Assessing the mortality risks of populations due to flooding is important and necessary for risk management and disaster reduction. Thus, this paper develops a method for assessing global mortality risks due to river flooding. Global historical annual death tolls are first estimated during the historical period 1986–2005 (T _0 ) by using available mortality vulnerability functions of river flooding. Then, the best vulnerability function is selected according to lower root mean square errors (RMSE) and the differences in the multi-year mean (DMYM) values. Next, the adjustment coefficient K _c for each country (region) is calculated to use in the revision of the selected vulnerability function. Finally, the mortality risks are estimated based on an adjusted vulnerability function. As a case, the paper assessed and analysed the global mortality risks due to river flooding during 2016–2035 (2030s) and 2046–2065 (2050s) for the combined scenario of the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) and the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2 (SSP2), and the RCP8.5-SSP5 scenario. The results show that the estimation errors of the death tolls in most countries (regions) decrease after adjusting the vulnerability function. Under the current defense capacity and vulnerability level, the average annual death tolls of RCP4.5-SSP2 and RCP8.5-SSP5 in the 2030s will increase by 1.05 times and 0.93 times compared with the historical period. They will increase 1.89 and 2.20 times, respectively for the two scenarios during 2050s. High-risk areas are distributed in the south-eastern Eurasia.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abff87globallyriver floodingmortality riskvulnerability
spellingShingle Junlin Zhang
Wei Xu
Xinli Liao
Shuo Zong
Baoyin Liu
Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change
Environmental Research Letters
globally
river flooding
mortality risk
vulnerability
title Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change
title_full Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change
title_fullStr Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change
title_full_unstemmed Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change
title_short Global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change
title_sort global mortality risk assessment from river flooding under climate change
topic globally
river flooding
mortality risk
vulnerability
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abff87
work_keys_str_mv AT junlinzhang globalmortalityriskassessmentfromriverfloodingunderclimatechange
AT weixu globalmortalityriskassessmentfromriverfloodingunderclimatechange
AT xinliliao globalmortalityriskassessmentfromriverfloodingunderclimatechange
AT shuozong globalmortalityriskassessmentfromriverfloodingunderclimatechange
AT baoyinliu globalmortalityriskassessmentfromriverfloodingunderclimatechange