Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group
A transparent corrections process is essential to assist in the maintenance of public confidence in scientific and medical research. In the era of preprints, fast-paced peer review, and early-access publication, errors and oversights from both authors and editors might be more common. The swift and...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2021-02-01
|
Series: | European Science Editing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/62065/download/pdf/ |
_version_ | 1797429183243091968 |
---|---|
author | Ashley N Cooper Jessica E Dwyer |
author_facet | Ashley N Cooper Jessica E Dwyer |
author_sort | Ashley N Cooper |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A transparent corrections process is essential to assist in the maintenance of public confidence in scientific and medical research. In the era of preprints, fast-paced peer review, and early-access publication, errors and oversights from both authors and editors might be more common. The swift and open correction of the public record requires the participation of authors, journal editors, and publishers, and in this Viewpoint we share The Lancet group’s best practices around errors and corrections. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T09:09:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ed1d45da649c48b6a3f4fbf8dda5f7f7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2518-3354 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T09:09:31Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | Article |
series | European Science Editing |
spelling | doaj.art-ed1d45da649c48b6a3f4fbf8dda5f7f72023-12-02T09:23:48ZengPensoft PublishersEuropean Science Editing2518-33542021-02-01471310.3897/ese.2021.e6206562065Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet groupAshley N Cooper0Jessica E Dwyer1The LancetThe LancetA transparent corrections process is essential to assist in the maintenance of public confidence in scientific and medical research. In the era of preprints, fast-paced peer review, and early-access publication, errors and oversights from both authors and editors might be more common. The swift and open correction of the public record requires the participation of authors, journal editors, and publishers, and in this Viewpoint we share The Lancet group’s best practices around errors and corrections.https://ese.arphahub.com/article/62065/download/pdf/correctionerrorethicspublication |
spellingShingle | Ashley N Cooper Jessica E Dwyer Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group European Science Editing correction error ethics publication |
title | Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group |
title_full | Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group |
title_fullStr | Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group |
title_full_unstemmed | Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group |
title_short | Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group |
title_sort | maintaining the integrity of the scientific record corrections and best practices at the lancet group |
topic | correction error ethics publication |
url | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/62065/download/pdf/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashleyncooper maintainingtheintegrityofthescientificrecordcorrectionsandbestpracticesatthelancetgroup AT jessicaedwyer maintainingtheintegrityofthescientificrecordcorrectionsandbestpracticesatthelancetgroup |