The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT

Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are difficult to diagnose, especially in critically ill patients. As the mannose receptor (MR) is shed from macrophage cell surfaces after exposure to fungi, we investigate whether its soluble serum form (sMR) can serve as a biomarker of IFI. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Greet De Vlieger, Ilse Vanhorebeek, Pieter J. Wouters, Inge Derese, Michael P. Casaer, Yves Debaveye, Greet Hermans, Philippe Meersseman, Holger J. Møller, Greet Van den Berghe, Catherine Ingels
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:Critical Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-019-2549-8
_version_ 1818158824390918144
author Greet De Vlieger
Ilse Vanhorebeek
Pieter J. Wouters
Inge Derese
Michael P. Casaer
Yves Debaveye
Greet Hermans
Philippe Meersseman
Holger J. Møller
Greet Van den Berghe
Catherine Ingels
author_facet Greet De Vlieger
Ilse Vanhorebeek
Pieter J. Wouters
Inge Derese
Michael P. Casaer
Yves Debaveye
Greet Hermans
Philippe Meersseman
Holger J. Møller
Greet Van den Berghe
Catherine Ingels
author_sort Greet De Vlieger
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are difficult to diagnose, especially in critically ill patients. As the mannose receptor (MR) is shed from macrophage cell surfaces after exposure to fungi, we investigate whether its soluble serum form (sMR) can serve as a biomarker of IFI. Methods This is a secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled trial (EPaNIC, n = 4640) that investigated the impact of initiating supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) early during critical illness (Early-PN) as compared to withholding it in the first week of intensive care (Late-PN). Serum sMR concentrations were measured in three matched patient groups (proven/probable IFI, n = 82; bacterial infection, n = 80; non-infectious inflammation, n = 77) on the day of antimicrobial initiation or matched intensive care unit day and the five preceding days, as well as in matched healthy controls (n = 59). Independent determinants of sMR concentration were identified via multivariable linear regression. Serum sMR time profiles were analysed with repeated-measures ANOVA. Predictive properties were assessed via area under the receiver operating curve (aROC). Results Serum sMR was higher in IFI patients than in all other groups (all p < 0.02), aROC to differentiate IFI from no IFI being 0.65 (p < 0.001). The ability of serum sMR to discriminate infectious from non-infectious inflammation was better with an aROC of 0.68 (p < 0.001). The sMR concentrations were already elevated up to 5 days before antimicrobial initiation and remained stable over time. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that an infection or an IFI, higher severity of illness and sepsis upon admission were associated with higher sMR levels; urgent admission and Late-PN were independently associated with lower sMR concentrations. Conclusion Serum sMR concentrations were higher in critically ill patients with IFI than in those with a bacterial infection or with non-infectious inflammation. However, test properties were insufficient for diagnostic purposes.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T15:36:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed27858cc56749a7907e7d8a8e72b670
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1364-8535
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T15:36:13Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Critical Care
spelling doaj.art-ed27858cc56749a7907e7d8a8e72b6702022-12-22T00:59:56ZengBMCCritical Care1364-85352019-08-012311910.1186/s13054-019-2549-8The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCTGreet De Vlieger0Ilse Vanhorebeek1Pieter J. Wouters2Inge Derese3Michael P. Casaer4Yves Debaveye5Greet Hermans6Philippe Meersseman7Holger J. Møller8Greet Van den Berghe9Catherine Ingels10Clinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, UZ LeuvenLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU LeuvenLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU LeuvenLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU LeuvenClinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, UZ LeuvenClinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, UZ LeuvenLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU LeuvenLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU LeuvenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University HospitalClinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, UZ LeuvenClinical Division of Intensive Care Medicine, UZ LeuvenAbstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are difficult to diagnose, especially in critically ill patients. As the mannose receptor (MR) is shed from macrophage cell surfaces after exposure to fungi, we investigate whether its soluble serum form (sMR) can serve as a biomarker of IFI. Methods This is a secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled trial (EPaNIC, n = 4640) that investigated the impact of initiating supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) early during critical illness (Early-PN) as compared to withholding it in the first week of intensive care (Late-PN). Serum sMR concentrations were measured in three matched patient groups (proven/probable IFI, n = 82; bacterial infection, n = 80; non-infectious inflammation, n = 77) on the day of antimicrobial initiation or matched intensive care unit day and the five preceding days, as well as in matched healthy controls (n = 59). Independent determinants of sMR concentration were identified via multivariable linear regression. Serum sMR time profiles were analysed with repeated-measures ANOVA. Predictive properties were assessed via area under the receiver operating curve (aROC). Results Serum sMR was higher in IFI patients than in all other groups (all p < 0.02), aROC to differentiate IFI from no IFI being 0.65 (p < 0.001). The ability of serum sMR to discriminate infectious from non-infectious inflammation was better with an aROC of 0.68 (p < 0.001). The sMR concentrations were already elevated up to 5 days before antimicrobial initiation and remained stable over time. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that an infection or an IFI, higher severity of illness and sepsis upon admission were associated with higher sMR levels; urgent admission and Late-PN were independently associated with lower sMR concentrations. Conclusion Serum sMR concentrations were higher in critically ill patients with IFI than in those with a bacterial infection or with non-infectious inflammation. However, test properties were insufficient for diagnostic purposes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-019-2549-8Invasive fungal infectionInflammationSoluble mannose receptorsMRSoluble CD206sCD206
spellingShingle Greet De Vlieger
Ilse Vanhorebeek
Pieter J. Wouters
Inge Derese
Michael P. Casaer
Yves Debaveye
Greet Hermans
Philippe Meersseman
Holger J. Møller
Greet Van den Berghe
Catherine Ingels
The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT
Critical Care
Invasive fungal infection
Inflammation
Soluble mannose receptor
sMR
Soluble CD206
sCD206
title The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT
title_full The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT
title_fullStr The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT
title_full_unstemmed The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT
title_short The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT
title_sort soluble mannose receptor smr scd206 in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections bacterial infections or non infectious inflammation a secondary analysis of the epanic rct
topic Invasive fungal infection
Inflammation
Soluble mannose receptor
sMR
Soluble CD206
sCD206
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-019-2549-8
work_keys_str_mv AT greetdevlieger thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT ilsevanhorebeek thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT pieterjwouters thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT ingederese thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT michaelpcasaer thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT yvesdebaveye thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT greethermans thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT philippemeersseman thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT holgerjmøller thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT greetvandenberghe thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT catherineingels thesolublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT greetdevlieger solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT ilsevanhorebeek solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT pieterjwouters solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT ingederese solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT michaelpcasaer solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT yvesdebaveye solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT greethermans solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT philippemeersseman solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT holgerjmøller solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT greetvandenberghe solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct
AT catherineingels solublemannosereceptorsmrscd206incriticallyillpatientswithinvasivefungalinfectionsbacterialinfectionsornoninfectiousinflammationasecondaryanalysisoftheepanicrct