Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South Africa

Poor and inadequate sanitation systems have been considered not only a human health issue, but also an environmental threat that instigates climate change. Nine heavy metals—arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn)—were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Babatunde Femi Bakare, Gbadebo Clement Adeyinka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Toxics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/10/6/340
_version_ 1797481800097857536
author Babatunde Femi Bakare
Gbadebo Clement Adeyinka
author_facet Babatunde Femi Bakare
Gbadebo Clement Adeyinka
author_sort Babatunde Femi Bakare
collection DOAJ
description Poor and inadequate sanitation systems have been considered not only a human health issue, but also an environmental threat that instigates climate change. Nine heavy metals—arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn)—were evaluated in influent and effluent water samples from four wastewater treatment plants in the Durban metropolis, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The results indicate that the mean concentrations of all the heavy metals in the influent samples ranged from 0.122 to 1.808 mg/L, while the effluent samples had a concentration ranging from 0.118 to 0.854 mg/L. Iron was found to be in the highest concentration and the concentration of Co was the lowest across the wastewater treatment plants. The levels for most of the heavy metals in this study were found to be above the recommended maximum concentrations in surface and effluent waters as stipulated by the World Health Organization, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Agriculture Organization, and the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry of South Africa. According to the toxicity effect due to non-carcinogenic risks, As, Pb, Cr, and Cd are considered to be of medium risk in this study, indicating that a probable adverse health risk is very likely to occur. Additionally, the cancer risk (RI) values were lower than 10<sup>−3</sup>, which shows that cancer development is very likely in individuals who are exposed. Cancer development associated with dermal absorption is quite negligible; thereby, it does not raise any concerns.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:19:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed2bef39895a45248c7c31790ec23139
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2305-6304
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:19:43Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Toxics
spelling doaj.art-ed2bef39895a45248c7c31790ec231392023-11-23T19:16:38ZengMDPI AGToxics2305-63042022-06-0110634010.3390/toxics10060340Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South AfricaBabatunde Femi Bakare0Gbadebo Clement Adeyinka1Environmental Pollution and Remediation Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban 4031, South AfricaEnvironmental Pollution and Remediation Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban 4031, South AfricaPoor and inadequate sanitation systems have been considered not only a human health issue, but also an environmental threat that instigates climate change. Nine heavy metals—arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn)—were evaluated in influent and effluent water samples from four wastewater treatment plants in the Durban metropolis, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The results indicate that the mean concentrations of all the heavy metals in the influent samples ranged from 0.122 to 1.808 mg/L, while the effluent samples had a concentration ranging from 0.118 to 0.854 mg/L. Iron was found to be in the highest concentration and the concentration of Co was the lowest across the wastewater treatment plants. The levels for most of the heavy metals in this study were found to be above the recommended maximum concentrations in surface and effluent waters as stipulated by the World Health Organization, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Agriculture Organization, and the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry of South Africa. According to the toxicity effect due to non-carcinogenic risks, As, Pb, Cr, and Cd are considered to be of medium risk in this study, indicating that a probable adverse health risk is very likely to occur. Additionally, the cancer risk (RI) values were lower than 10<sup>−3</sup>, which shows that cancer development is very likely in individuals who are exposed. Cancer development associated with dermal absorption is quite negligible; thereby, it does not raise any concerns.https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/10/6/340heavy metal pollutioninfluent and effluent samplesnon-carcinogeniccancer risk
spellingShingle Babatunde Femi Bakare
Gbadebo Clement Adeyinka
Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South Africa
Toxics
heavy metal pollution
influent and effluent samples
non-carcinogenic
cancer risk
title Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South Africa
title_full Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South Africa
title_fullStr Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South Africa
title_short Evaluating the Potential Health Risks of Selected Heavy Metals across Four Wastewater Treatment Water Works in Durban, South Africa
title_sort evaluating the potential health risks of selected heavy metals across four wastewater treatment water works in durban south africa
topic heavy metal pollution
influent and effluent samples
non-carcinogenic
cancer risk
url https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/10/6/340
work_keys_str_mv AT babatundefemibakare evaluatingthepotentialhealthrisksofselectedheavymetalsacrossfourwastewatertreatmentwaterworksindurbansouthafrica
AT gbadeboclementadeyinka evaluatingthepotentialhealthrisksofselectedheavymetalsacrossfourwastewatertreatmentwaterworksindurbansouthafrica