Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolation

One common experimental hurdle that arises when explore patterns of cytosine methylation is the generation of data derived from a single specific tissue, often arduous to isolate from a heterogeneous biospecimen. Here we show a new strategy for exploring environment- or mutation-caused changes in ce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cecilia C. Beyrne, Rodrigo M. González, Norberto D. Iusem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Epigenetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2019.1565589
_version_ 1797678926790656000
author Cecilia C. Beyrne
Rodrigo M. González
Norberto D. Iusem
author_facet Cecilia C. Beyrne
Rodrigo M. González
Norberto D. Iusem
author_sort Cecilia C. Beyrne
collection DOAJ
description One common experimental hurdle that arises when explore patterns of cytosine methylation is the generation of data derived from a single specific tissue, often arduous to isolate from a heterogeneous biospecimen. Here we show a new strategy for exploring environment- or mutation-caused changes in cell type- or tissue-specific methylation landscapes, which requires neither transgenic reporter cell lines nor physical separation. This approach takes advantage of a known distinct methylation signature existing in only one of the tissues within an organ under a particular condition. From the information on such compared published methylomes, one can design a set of PCR primers that specifically amplify bisulfite-converted DNA of two nearby genomic regions of interest, thus allowing for tissue-specific DNA methylation data. To validate the performance of the approach, we designed primers able to amplify a portion of a gene in the context of root biology: the Arabidopsis homeotic gene Glabra-2 (Gl2), expressed only in epidermis during cell differentiation. We found that the extent of methylated cytosines appears remarkably different when root epidermis-specific primers were used vs. non-specific ones under three genetic backgrounds involving mutations in genes also associated with the establishment of cell identity. Although the genetic or environmental perturbations to be studied might modify methylation in the primer-annealing zone, leading to a possible misinterpretation of the data, the strategy presented here can become a useful first round screening tool to detect differences in tissue-specific epigenetic status under new conditions.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:06:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed34576513e847feb9d186dfd693670d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1559-2294
1559-2308
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:06:59Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Epigenetics
spelling doaj.art-ed34576513e847feb9d186dfd693670d2023-09-21T13:09:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEpigenetics1559-22941559-23082019-01-01141415110.1080/15592294.2019.15655891565589Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolationCecilia C. Beyrne0Rodrigo M. González1Norberto D. Iusem2Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE); CONICETBiología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE); CONICETBiología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE); CONICETOne common experimental hurdle that arises when explore patterns of cytosine methylation is the generation of data derived from a single specific tissue, often arduous to isolate from a heterogeneous biospecimen. Here we show a new strategy for exploring environment- or mutation-caused changes in cell type- or tissue-specific methylation landscapes, which requires neither transgenic reporter cell lines nor physical separation. This approach takes advantage of a known distinct methylation signature existing in only one of the tissues within an organ under a particular condition. From the information on such compared published methylomes, one can design a set of PCR primers that specifically amplify bisulfite-converted DNA of two nearby genomic regions of interest, thus allowing for tissue-specific DNA methylation data. To validate the performance of the approach, we designed primers able to amplify a portion of a gene in the context of root biology: the Arabidopsis homeotic gene Glabra-2 (Gl2), expressed only in epidermis during cell differentiation. We found that the extent of methylated cytosines appears remarkably different when root epidermis-specific primers were used vs. non-specific ones under three genetic backgrounds involving mutations in genes also associated with the establishment of cell identity. Although the genetic or environmental perturbations to be studied might modify methylation in the primer-annealing zone, leading to a possible misinterpretation of the data, the strategy presented here can become a useful first round screening tool to detect differences in tissue-specific epigenetic status under new conditions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2019.1565589dna methylationtissue-specificarabidopsisroot epidermisbisulfite techniqueglabra2
spellingShingle Cecilia C. Beyrne
Rodrigo M. González
Norberto D. Iusem
Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolation
Epigenetics
dna methylation
tissue-specific
arabidopsis
root epidermis
bisulfite technique
glabra2
title Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolation
title_full Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolation
title_fullStr Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolation
title_full_unstemmed Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolation
title_short Strategy for the analysis of tissue-specific methylation changes without physical isolation
title_sort strategy for the analysis of tissue specific methylation changes without physical isolation
topic dna methylation
tissue-specific
arabidopsis
root epidermis
bisulfite technique
glabra2
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2019.1565589
work_keys_str_mv AT ceciliacbeyrne strategyfortheanalysisoftissuespecificmethylationchangeswithoutphysicalisolation
AT rodrigomgonzalez strategyfortheanalysisoftissuespecificmethylationchangeswithoutphysicalisolation
AT norbertodiusem strategyfortheanalysisoftissuespecificmethylationchangeswithoutphysicalisolation