Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies frequently use nasal swabs to determine <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it> carriage. Self-sampling would be extremely useful in an outhospital research situation, but has not been studied in a healthy population. We s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Cleef Brigitte AGL, van Rijen Miranda, Ferket Marianne, Kluytmans Jan AJW
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-11-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aricjournal.com/content/1/1/34
_version_ 1811277783835344896
author van Cleef Brigitte AGL
van Rijen Miranda
Ferket Marianne
Kluytmans Jan AJW
author_facet van Cleef Brigitte AGL
van Rijen Miranda
Ferket Marianne
Kluytmans Jan AJW
author_sort van Cleef Brigitte AGL
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies frequently use nasal swabs to determine <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it> carriage. Self-sampling would be extremely useful in an outhospital research situation, but has not been studied in a healthy population. We studied the similarity of self-samples and investigator-samples in nares and pharynxes of healthy study subjects (hospital staff) in the Netherlands.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>One hundred and five nursing personnel members were sampled 4 times in random order after viewing an instruction paper: 1) nasal self-sample, 2) pharyngeal self-sample, 3) nasal investigator-sample, and 4) pharyngeal investigator-sample.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For nasal samples, agreement is 93% with a kappa coefficient of 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96), indicating excellent agreement, for pharyngeal samples agreement is 83% and the kappa coefficient is 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.76), indicating good agreement. In both sampling sites self-samples even detected more <it>S. aureus</it> than investigator-samples.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This means that self-samples are appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it> and methicillin-resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:22:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed3705d1ab6345cd8d1bad20b4be6d44
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-2994
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:22:24Z
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
spelling doaj.art-ed3705d1ab6345cd8d1bad20b4be6d442022-12-22T03:10:43ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942012-11-01113410.1186/2047-2994-1-34Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation studyvan Cleef Brigitte AGLvan Rijen MirandaFerket MarianneKluytmans Jan AJW<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies frequently use nasal swabs to determine <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it> carriage. Self-sampling would be extremely useful in an outhospital research situation, but has not been studied in a healthy population. We studied the similarity of self-samples and investigator-samples in nares and pharynxes of healthy study subjects (hospital staff) in the Netherlands.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>One hundred and five nursing personnel members were sampled 4 times in random order after viewing an instruction paper: 1) nasal self-sample, 2) pharyngeal self-sample, 3) nasal investigator-sample, and 4) pharyngeal investigator-sample.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For nasal samples, agreement is 93% with a kappa coefficient of 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96), indicating excellent agreement, for pharyngeal samples agreement is 83% and the kappa coefficient is 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.76), indicating good agreement. In both sampling sites self-samples even detected more <it>S. aureus</it> than investigator-samples.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This means that self-samples are appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it> and methicillin-resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>.</p>http://www.aricjournal.com/content/1/1/34Self-sampling<it>Staphylcococcus aureus</it>MRSAValidation
spellingShingle van Cleef Brigitte AGL
van Rijen Miranda
Ferket Marianne
Kluytmans Jan AJW
Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation study
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Self-sampling
<it>Staphylcococcus aureus</it>
MRSA
Validation
title Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation study
title_full Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation study
title_fullStr Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation study
title_short Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>: a validation study
title_sort self sampling is appropriate for detection of it staphylococcus aureus it a validation study
topic Self-sampling
<it>Staphylcococcus aureus</it>
MRSA
Validation
url http://www.aricjournal.com/content/1/1/34
work_keys_str_mv AT vancleefbrigitteagl selfsamplingisappropriatefordetectionofitstaphylococcusaureusitavalidationstudy
AT vanrijenmiranda selfsamplingisappropriatefordetectionofitstaphylococcusaureusitavalidationstudy
AT ferketmarianne selfsamplingisappropriatefordetectionofitstaphylococcusaureusitavalidationstudy
AT kluytmansjanajw selfsamplingisappropriatefordetectionofitstaphylococcusaureusitavalidationstudy