“Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance

Recently, creative deviance has been lauded to be an innovation-enhancing approach with applications in many new and high-tech domains. Previous study on antecedents to creative deviance remains scattered and vague. Our research conceptualizes creative deviance from the perspective of independent in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Xu, Yong-Zhou Li, De-Qun Zhu, Jing-Zhi Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970/full
_version_ 1811272719518400512
author Jing Xu
Yong-Zhou Li
De-Qun Zhu
Jing-Zhi Li
author_facet Jing Xu
Yong-Zhou Li
De-Qun Zhu
Jing-Zhi Li
author_sort Jing Xu
collection DOAJ
description Recently, creative deviance has been lauded to be an innovation-enhancing approach with applications in many new and high-tech domains. Previous study on antecedents to creative deviance remains scattered and vague. Our research conceptualizes creative deviance from the perspective of independent innovation and explores its antecedents, mechanisms, as well as conditions. Team authoritarian leadership is conceptualized as a contradictory unity as it mixes advantages and disadvantages. However, it is surprising to find that there are very few researches that have examined its relevant influence mechanisms and boundary conditions for authoritarian leadership. Contributing to an advanced understanding of authoritarian leadership in research and development teams, we investigated whether team authoritarian leadership is positively or negatively related to creative deviance. Drawing on social information processing theory and regulatory focus theory, we supposed that team authoritarian leadership facilitates creative deviance when the degree is low and inhibits it when the degree is high; dual occupational stress and prevention regulatory focus play mediation roles between team authoritarian leadership and creative deviance respectively, both variables play a chain mediation role in that relationship; and the mindfulness characteristic of an individual moderates the inverted-U team authoritarian leadership-creative deviance association, such that this association is weaker with low individual mindfulness. With two-phase questionnaire data collected from 433 members in 82 R&D teams of high-tech enterprises in electronic information technology, new material technology, new medical technology, resource and environment technology and advanced manufacturing technology randomly selected from five provinces in eastern China, these hypotheses are supported empirically. Overall, we find that, our study broadens antecedents and the relevant occurrence mechanisms of creative deviance when studied through a leadership management lens. Moreover, our research enriches the cognate studies on authoritarian leadership by empirically demonstrating that team authoritarian leadership may function as an double-edged sword of creative deviance in the R&D workplace. These above findings offer insightful thoughts to scholars in the field of authoritarian leadership and bring practical suggestions for team superiors who seek to implement best innovation practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:45:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed5963b27233416eb97ab5ba6331ca55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:45:23Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-ed5963b27233416eb97ab5ba6331ca552022-12-22T03:13:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-03-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970835970“Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative DevianceJing Xu0Yong-Zhou Li1De-Qun Zhu2Jing-Zhi Li3Evergrande School of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaEvergrande School of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, ChinaSchool of Labor Relations and Personnel, Renmin University of China, Beijing, ChinaRecently, creative deviance has been lauded to be an innovation-enhancing approach with applications in many new and high-tech domains. Previous study on antecedents to creative deviance remains scattered and vague. Our research conceptualizes creative deviance from the perspective of independent innovation and explores its antecedents, mechanisms, as well as conditions. Team authoritarian leadership is conceptualized as a contradictory unity as it mixes advantages and disadvantages. However, it is surprising to find that there are very few researches that have examined its relevant influence mechanisms and boundary conditions for authoritarian leadership. Contributing to an advanced understanding of authoritarian leadership in research and development teams, we investigated whether team authoritarian leadership is positively or negatively related to creative deviance. Drawing on social information processing theory and regulatory focus theory, we supposed that team authoritarian leadership facilitates creative deviance when the degree is low and inhibits it when the degree is high; dual occupational stress and prevention regulatory focus play mediation roles between team authoritarian leadership and creative deviance respectively, both variables play a chain mediation role in that relationship; and the mindfulness characteristic of an individual moderates the inverted-U team authoritarian leadership-creative deviance association, such that this association is weaker with low individual mindfulness. With two-phase questionnaire data collected from 433 members in 82 R&D teams of high-tech enterprises in electronic information technology, new material technology, new medical technology, resource and environment technology and advanced manufacturing technology randomly selected from five provinces in eastern China, these hypotheses are supported empirically. Overall, we find that, our study broadens antecedents and the relevant occurrence mechanisms of creative deviance when studied through a leadership management lens. Moreover, our research enriches the cognate studies on authoritarian leadership by empirically demonstrating that team authoritarian leadership may function as an double-edged sword of creative deviance in the R&D workplace. These above findings offer insightful thoughts to scholars in the field of authoritarian leadership and bring practical suggestions for team superiors who seek to implement best innovation practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970/fullteam authoritarian leadershipcreative deviancedual occupational stressprevention regulatory focusindividual mindfulness
spellingShingle Jing Xu
Yong-Zhou Li
De-Qun Zhu
Jing-Zhi Li
“Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance
Frontiers in Psychology
team authoritarian leadership
creative deviance
dual occupational stress
prevention regulatory focus
individual mindfulness
title “Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance
title_full “Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance
title_fullStr “Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance
title_full_unstemmed “Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance
title_short “Lubricant” or “Stumbling Block”?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance
title_sort lubricant or stumbling block the paradoxical association between team authoritarian leadership and creative deviance
topic team authoritarian leadership
creative deviance
dual occupational stress
prevention regulatory focus
individual mindfulness
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jingxu lubricantorstumblingblocktheparadoxicalassociationbetweenteamauthoritarianleadershipandcreativedeviance
AT yongzhouli lubricantorstumblingblocktheparadoxicalassociationbetweenteamauthoritarianleadershipandcreativedeviance
AT dequnzhu lubricantorstumblingblocktheparadoxicalassociationbetweenteamauthoritarianleadershipandcreativedeviance
AT jingzhili lubricantorstumblingblocktheparadoxicalassociationbetweenteamauthoritarianleadershipandcreativedeviance