Investigating cooperation with robotic peers.
We explored how people establish cooperation with robotic peers, by giving participants the chance to choose whether to cooperate or not with a more/less selfish robot, as well as a more or less interactive, in a more or less critical environment. We measured the participants' tendency to coope...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225028 |
| _version_ | 1819044477813129216 |
|---|---|
| author | Debora Zanatto Massimiliano Patacchiola Jeremy Goslin Angelo Cangelosi |
| author_facet | Debora Zanatto Massimiliano Patacchiola Jeremy Goslin Angelo Cangelosi |
| author_sort | Debora Zanatto |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We explored how people establish cooperation with robotic peers, by giving participants the chance to choose whether to cooperate or not with a more/less selfish robot, as well as a more or less interactive, in a more or less critical environment. We measured the participants' tendency to cooperate with the robot as well as their perception of anthropomorphism, trust and credibility through questionnaires. We found that cooperation in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) follows the same rule of Human-Human Interaction (HHI), participants rewarded cooperation with cooperation, and punished selfishness with selfishness. We also discovered two specific robotic profiles capable of increasing cooperation, related to the payoff. A mute and non-interactive robot is preferred with a high payoff, while participants preferred a more human-behaving robot in conditions of low payoff. Taken together, these results suggest that proper cooperation in HRI is possible but is related to the complexity of the task. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T10:13:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ed5e354dc94c4756b89040e1709a1aa5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T10:13:18Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-ed5e354dc94c4756b89040e1709a1aa52022-12-21T19:07:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011411e022502810.1371/journal.pone.0225028Investigating cooperation with robotic peers.Debora ZanattoMassimiliano PatacchiolaJeremy GoslinAngelo CangelosiWe explored how people establish cooperation with robotic peers, by giving participants the chance to choose whether to cooperate or not with a more/less selfish robot, as well as a more or less interactive, in a more or less critical environment. We measured the participants' tendency to cooperate with the robot as well as their perception of anthropomorphism, trust and credibility through questionnaires. We found that cooperation in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) follows the same rule of Human-Human Interaction (HHI), participants rewarded cooperation with cooperation, and punished selfishness with selfishness. We also discovered two specific robotic profiles capable of increasing cooperation, related to the payoff. A mute and non-interactive robot is preferred with a high payoff, while participants preferred a more human-behaving robot in conditions of low payoff. Taken together, these results suggest that proper cooperation in HRI is possible but is related to the complexity of the task.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225028 |
| spellingShingle | Debora Zanatto Massimiliano Patacchiola Jeremy Goslin Angelo Cangelosi Investigating cooperation with robotic peers. PLoS ONE |
| title | Investigating cooperation with robotic peers. |
| title_full | Investigating cooperation with robotic peers. |
| title_fullStr | Investigating cooperation with robotic peers. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investigating cooperation with robotic peers. |
| title_short | Investigating cooperation with robotic peers. |
| title_sort | investigating cooperation with robotic peers |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225028 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT deborazanatto investigatingcooperationwithroboticpeers AT massimilianopatacchiola investigatingcooperationwithroboticpeers AT jeremygoslin investigatingcooperationwithroboticpeers AT angelocangelosi investigatingcooperationwithroboticpeers |