Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian Cells

Extraction of membrane proteins from biological membranes has traditionally involved detergents. In the past decade, a new technique has been developed, which uses styrene maleic acid (SMA) copolymers to extract membrane proteins into nanodiscs without the requirement of detergents. SMA nanodiscs ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kerrie A. Morrison, Kate J. Heesom, Karen J. Edler, James Doutch, Gareth J. Price, Francoise Koumanov, Paul Whitley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2021.780033/full
_version_ 1818345246650531840
author Kerrie A. Morrison
Kerrie A. Morrison
Kerrie A. Morrison
Kate J. Heesom
Karen J. Edler
James Doutch
Gareth J. Price
Gareth J. Price
Francoise Koumanov
Paul Whitley
author_facet Kerrie A. Morrison
Kerrie A. Morrison
Kerrie A. Morrison
Kate J. Heesom
Karen J. Edler
James Doutch
Gareth J. Price
Gareth J. Price
Francoise Koumanov
Paul Whitley
author_sort Kerrie A. Morrison
collection DOAJ
description Extraction of membrane proteins from biological membranes has traditionally involved detergents. In the past decade, a new technique has been developed, which uses styrene maleic acid (SMA) copolymers to extract membrane proteins into nanodiscs without the requirement of detergents. SMA nanodiscs are compatible with analytical techniques, such as small-angle scattering, NMR spectroscopy, and DLS, and are therefore an attractive medium for membrane protein characterization. While mass spectrometry has also been reported as a technique compatible with copolymer extraction, most studies have focused on lipidomics, which involves solvent extraction of lipids from nanodiscs prior to mass-spectrometry analysis. In this study, mass spectrometry proteomics was used to investigate whether there are qualitative or quantitative differences in the mammalian plasma membrane proteins extracted with SMA compared to a detergent control. For this, cell surface proteins of 3T3L1 fibroblasts were biotinylated and extracted using either SMA or detergent. Following affinity pull-down of biotinylated proteins with NeutrAvidin beads, samples were analyzed by nanoLC-MS. Here, we report for the first time, a global proteomics protocol for detection of a mammalian cell “SMALPome”, membrane proteins incorporated into SMA nanodiscs. Removal of SMA from samples prior to processing of samples for mass spectrometry was a crucial step in the protocol. The reported surface SMALPome of 3T3L1 fibroblasts consists of 205 integral membrane proteins. It is apparent that the detergent extraction method used is, in general, quantitatively more efficient at extracting proteins from the plasma membrane than SMA extraction. However, samples prepared following detergent extraction contained a greater proportion of proteins that were considered to be “non-specific” than in samples prepared from SMA extracts. Tantalizingly, it was also observed that proteins detected uniquely or highly preferentially in pull-downs from SMA extracts were primarily multi-spanning membrane proteins. These observations hint at qualitative differences between SMA and detergent extraction that are worthy of further investigation.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:59:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed5fe860386a4b6d918d3a88a6b822fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-889X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:59:20Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
spelling doaj.art-ed5fe860386a4b6d918d3a88a6b822fc2022-12-21T23:37:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences2296-889X2021-11-01810.3389/fmolb.2021.780033780033Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian CellsKerrie A. Morrison0Kerrie A. Morrison1Kerrie A. Morrison2Kate J. Heesom3Karen J. Edler4James Doutch5Gareth J. Price6Gareth J. Price7Francoise Koumanov8Paul Whitley9Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United KingdomDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United KingdomCentre for Sustainable Circular Technologies, University of Bath, Bath, United KingdomUniversity of Bristol, Proteomics Facility, Bristol, United KingdomDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United KingdomRutherford Appleton Laboratory, ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source, Harwell Oxford, United KingdomDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United KingdomDepartment of Chemistry, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab EmiratesDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United KingdomDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United KingdomExtraction of membrane proteins from biological membranes has traditionally involved detergents. In the past decade, a new technique has been developed, which uses styrene maleic acid (SMA) copolymers to extract membrane proteins into nanodiscs without the requirement of detergents. SMA nanodiscs are compatible with analytical techniques, such as small-angle scattering, NMR spectroscopy, and DLS, and are therefore an attractive medium for membrane protein characterization. While mass spectrometry has also been reported as a technique compatible with copolymer extraction, most studies have focused on lipidomics, which involves solvent extraction of lipids from nanodiscs prior to mass-spectrometry analysis. In this study, mass spectrometry proteomics was used to investigate whether there are qualitative or quantitative differences in the mammalian plasma membrane proteins extracted with SMA compared to a detergent control. For this, cell surface proteins of 3T3L1 fibroblasts were biotinylated and extracted using either SMA or detergent. Following affinity pull-down of biotinylated proteins with NeutrAvidin beads, samples were analyzed by nanoLC-MS. Here, we report for the first time, a global proteomics protocol for detection of a mammalian cell “SMALPome”, membrane proteins incorporated into SMA nanodiscs. Removal of SMA from samples prior to processing of samples for mass spectrometry was a crucial step in the protocol. The reported surface SMALPome of 3T3L1 fibroblasts consists of 205 integral membrane proteins. It is apparent that the detergent extraction method used is, in general, quantitatively more efficient at extracting proteins from the plasma membrane than SMA extraction. However, samples prepared following detergent extraction contained a greater proportion of proteins that were considered to be “non-specific” than in samples prepared from SMA extracts. Tantalizingly, it was also observed that proteins detected uniquely or highly preferentially in pull-downs from SMA extracts were primarily multi-spanning membrane proteins. These observations hint at qualitative differences between SMA and detergent extraction that are worthy of further investigation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2021.780033/fullstyrene maleic acidSMAmass spectrometry proteomicsSMALPSMALPome
spellingShingle Kerrie A. Morrison
Kerrie A. Morrison
Kerrie A. Morrison
Kate J. Heesom
Karen J. Edler
James Doutch
Gareth J. Price
Gareth J. Price
Francoise Koumanov
Paul Whitley
Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian Cells
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
styrene maleic acid
SMA
mass spectrometry proteomics
SMALP
SMALPome
title Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian Cells
title_full Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian Cells
title_fullStr Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian Cells
title_full_unstemmed Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian Cells
title_short Development of Methodology to Investigate the Surface SMALPome of Mammalian Cells
title_sort development of methodology to investigate the surface smalpome of mammalian cells
topic styrene maleic acid
SMA
mass spectrometry proteomics
SMALP
SMALPome
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2021.780033/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kerrieamorrison developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT kerrieamorrison developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT kerrieamorrison developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT katejheesom developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT karenjedler developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT jamesdoutch developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT garethjprice developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT garethjprice developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT francoisekoumanov developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells
AT paulwhitley developmentofmethodologytoinvestigatethesurfacesmalpomeofmammaliancells