Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers

REML (restricted maximum likelihood) has become the standard method of variance component estimation in animal breeding. Inference in Bayesian animal models is typically based upon Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which are generally flexible but time-consuming. Recently, a new Bayesian com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Maniatis, N. Demiris, A. Kranis, G. Banos, A. Kominakis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-07-01
Series:Archives Animal Breeding
Online Access:http://www.arch-anim-breed.net/58/277/2015/aab-58-277-2015.pdf
_version_ 1819093332203143168
author G. Maniatis
N. Demiris
A. Kranis
G. Banos
A. Kominakis
author_facet G. Maniatis
N. Demiris
A. Kranis
G. Banos
A. Kominakis
author_sort G. Maniatis
collection DOAJ
description REML (restricted maximum likelihood) has become the standard method of variance component estimation in animal breeding. Inference in Bayesian animal models is typically based upon Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which are generally flexible but time-consuming. Recently, a new Bayesian computational method, integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), has been introduced for making fast non-sampling-based Bayesian inference for hierarchical latent Gaussian models. This paper is concerned with the comparison of estimates provided by three representative programs (ASReml, WinBUGS and the R package AnimalINLA) of the corresponding methods (REML, MCMC and INLA), with a view to their applicability for the typical animal breeder. Gaussian and binary as well as simulated data were used to assess the relative efficiency of the methods. Analysis of 2319 records of body weight at 35 days of age from a broiler line suggested a purely additive animal model, in which the heritability estimates ranged from 0.31 to 0.34 for the Gaussian trait and from 0.19 to 0.36 for the binary trait, depending on the estimation method. Although in need of further development, AnimalINLA seems a fast program for Bayesian modeling, particularly suitable for the inference of Gaussian traits, while WinBUGS appeared to successfully accommodate a complicated structure between the random effects. However, ASReml remains the best practical choice for the serious animal breeder.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T23:09:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed64b66caf9e4a9ba79a8ff38105b84b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0003-9438
2363-9822
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T23:09:50Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Archives Animal Breeding
spelling doaj.art-ed64b66caf9e4a9ba79a8ff38105b84b2022-12-21T18:47:05ZengCopernicus PublicationsArchives Animal Breeding0003-94382363-98222015-07-0158227728610.5194/aab-58-277-2015Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilersG. Maniatis0N. Demiris1A. Kranis2G. Banos3A. Kominakis4Faculty of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 118 55 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, 76 Patission Str., 10434 Athens, GreeceThe Roslin Institute and Royal School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UKThe Roslin Institute and Royal School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UKFaculty of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 118 55 Athens, GreeceREML (restricted maximum likelihood) has become the standard method of variance component estimation in animal breeding. Inference in Bayesian animal models is typically based upon Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which are generally flexible but time-consuming. Recently, a new Bayesian computational method, integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), has been introduced for making fast non-sampling-based Bayesian inference for hierarchical latent Gaussian models. This paper is concerned with the comparison of estimates provided by three representative programs (ASReml, WinBUGS and the R package AnimalINLA) of the corresponding methods (REML, MCMC and INLA), with a view to their applicability for the typical animal breeder. Gaussian and binary as well as simulated data were used to assess the relative efficiency of the methods. Analysis of 2319 records of body weight at 35 days of age from a broiler line suggested a purely additive animal model, in which the heritability estimates ranged from 0.31 to 0.34 for the Gaussian trait and from 0.19 to 0.36 for the binary trait, depending on the estimation method. Although in need of further development, AnimalINLA seems a fast program for Bayesian modeling, particularly suitable for the inference of Gaussian traits, while WinBUGS appeared to successfully accommodate a complicated structure between the random effects. However, ASReml remains the best practical choice for the serious animal breeder.http://www.arch-anim-breed.net/58/277/2015/aab-58-277-2015.pdf
spellingShingle G. Maniatis
N. Demiris
A. Kranis
G. Banos
A. Kominakis
Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers
Archives Animal Breeding
title Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers
title_full Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers
title_fullStr Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers
title_short Comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers
title_sort comparison of inference methods of genetic parameters with an application to body weight in broilers
url http://www.arch-anim-breed.net/58/277/2015/aab-58-277-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gmaniatis comparisonofinferencemethodsofgeneticparameterswithanapplicationtobodyweightinbroilers
AT ndemiris comparisonofinferencemethodsofgeneticparameterswithanapplicationtobodyweightinbroilers
AT akranis comparisonofinferencemethodsofgeneticparameterswithanapplicationtobodyweightinbroilers
AT gbanos comparisonofinferencemethodsofgeneticparameterswithanapplicationtobodyweightinbroilers
AT akominakis comparisonofinferencemethodsofgeneticparameterswithanapplicationtobodyweightinbroilers