A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer

Background To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were rand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keke Nie, Zhen Zhang, Yunhong You, Xingjun Zhuang, Chunling Zhang, Youxin Ji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13238
_version_ 1828154781748690944
author Keke Nie
Zhen Zhang
Yunhong You
Xingjun Zhuang
Chunling Zhang
Youxin Ji
author_facet Keke Nie
Zhen Zhang
Yunhong You
Xingjun Zhuang
Chunling Zhang
Youxin Ji
author_sort Keke Nie
collection DOAJ
description Background To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. The pleural effusion was completely drained in 24 hours; one group received intrapleural infusion and the second group received intravenous infusion of bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg per kg bodyweight. The serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was tested before and 72 hours after injection of bevacizumab. Computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate pleural effusions was carried out at four weeks for each patient and their survival followed‐up. Results A total of 67 patients were screened and 43 enrolled into the study. The response rate was 80% (16 of 20) in the intrapleural group and 66.7% (14 of 21) in the intravenous group. The median duration of response (DoR) of pleural effusion was 4.50 months and 3.70 months, respectively. The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 67.25% in the intrapleural group and 57.19% in the intravenous group compared to baseline level (P = 0.276). The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 52.02% compared to baseline level in patients’ DoR less than three months and 68.33% in patients' DoR longer than three months, respectively (P = 0.014). The main side effects noted were mild to moderate hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis. Conclusions Bevacizumab intrapleural infusion had higher efficiency and higher safety than intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion caused by NSCLC. The decreased level of serum VEGF at 72 hours after bevacizumab treatment was closely related to the response rate and duration of the response of pleural effusion.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:44:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed663cb83c404ad98d36a256eeb53ead
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:44:48Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Thoracic Cancer
spelling doaj.art-ed663cb83c404ad98d36a256eeb53ead2022-12-22T03:58:48ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142020-01-0111181410.1111/1759-7714.13238A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancerKeke Nie0Zhen Zhang1Yunhong You2Xingjun Zhuang3Chunling Zhang4Youxin Ji5Department of Oncology Qingdao Cancer Hospital Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Oncology Qingdao Cancer Hospital Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Oncology Qingdao Cancer Hospital Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Oncology PLA 971 Hospital Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Oncology Qingdao Central Hospital, the Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Oncology Qingdao Central Hospital, the Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao ChinaBackground To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. The pleural effusion was completely drained in 24 hours; one group received intrapleural infusion and the second group received intravenous infusion of bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg per kg bodyweight. The serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was tested before and 72 hours after injection of bevacizumab. Computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate pleural effusions was carried out at four weeks for each patient and their survival followed‐up. Results A total of 67 patients were screened and 43 enrolled into the study. The response rate was 80% (16 of 20) in the intrapleural group and 66.7% (14 of 21) in the intravenous group. The median duration of response (DoR) of pleural effusion was 4.50 months and 3.70 months, respectively. The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 67.25% in the intrapleural group and 57.19% in the intravenous group compared to baseline level (P = 0.276). The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 52.02% compared to baseline level in patients’ DoR less than three months and 68.33% in patients' DoR longer than three months, respectively (P = 0.014). The main side effects noted were mild to moderate hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis. Conclusions Bevacizumab intrapleural infusion had higher efficiency and higher safety than intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion caused by NSCLC. The decreased level of serum VEGF at 72 hours after bevacizumab treatment was closely related to the response rate and duration of the response of pleural effusion.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13238Bevacizumabmalignant pleural effusionnon‐small‐cell lung cancervascular endothelial growth factor
spellingShingle Keke Nie
Zhen Zhang
Yunhong You
Xingjun Zhuang
Chunling Zhang
Youxin Ji
A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
Thoracic Cancer
Bevacizumab
malignant pleural effusion
non‐small‐cell lung cancer
vascular endothelial growth factor
title A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_full A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_short A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_sort randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non small cell lung cancer
topic Bevacizumab
malignant pleural effusion
non‐small‐cell lung cancer
vascular endothelial growth factor
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13238
work_keys_str_mv AT kekenie arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhenzhang arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yunhongyou arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT xingjunzhuang arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chunlingzhang arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT youxinji arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kekenie randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhenzhang randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yunhongyou randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT xingjunzhuang randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chunlingzhang randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT youxinji randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer