Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy

Background: Central pancreatectomy(CP) is more complex surgery and higher complication rate than distal pancreatectomy(DP). However, with the development of minimally invasive surgery, CP has become a safer surgery technique. In this study, we compare minimally invasive CP(MI-CP) and Minimally invas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dawn Jung, Hassaan Bari, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Woo Jung Lee, Chang Moo Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-02-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958422011988
_version_ 1811173446434947072
author Dawn Jung
Hassaan Bari
Ho Kyoung Hwang
Woo Jung Lee
Chang Moo Kang
author_facet Dawn Jung
Hassaan Bari
Ho Kyoung Hwang
Woo Jung Lee
Chang Moo Kang
author_sort Dawn Jung
collection DOAJ
description Background: Central pancreatectomy(CP) is more complex surgery and higher complication rate than distal pancreatectomy(DP). However, with the development of minimally invasive surgery, CP has become a safer surgery technique. In this study, we compare minimally invasive CP(MI-CP) and Minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal DP(MI-SpSTDP) to figure out the short-term and long-term outcomes of MI-CP. Methods: From March 2007 to June 2020, 36 cases of MI-SpSTDP and 23 cases of MI-CP were performed for benign and borderline malignant pancreatic tumors in Severance hospital. The occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and Clavian-Dindo classification grade 3 or more in the two group was investigated, and the Controlling nutritional status scores(CONUT score) before and 1-year after surgery were compared to determine the long-term outcomes of exocrine function. Results: There was no difference in postoperative complications including POPF between the two groups(17.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.294). And there were no statistical differences in either the MI-CP group (0.74 ± 0.75 vs. 0.78 ± 0.99, p = 0.803) or the MI-SpSTDP group (0.86 ± 0.83 to 0.61 ± 0.59, p = 0.071). Conclusions: MI-CP had longer operation time and hospital stay and is safe and effective in preserving endocrine and exocrine functions in treatment of benign or borderline tumors located at the neck or proximal body of the pancreas.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:48:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed67b63fd1a544de882fbf92c8411c1e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1015-9584
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:48:08Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Surgery
spelling doaj.art-ed67b63fd1a544de882fbf92c8411c1e2023-02-03T04:56:56ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842023-02-01462824828Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomyDawn Jung0Hassaan Bari1Ho Kyoung Hwang2Woo Jung Lee3Chang Moo Kang4Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea; Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South KoreaAga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PakistanDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea; Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea; Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea; Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Corresponding author. Severance Hospital, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.Background: Central pancreatectomy(CP) is more complex surgery and higher complication rate than distal pancreatectomy(DP). However, with the development of minimally invasive surgery, CP has become a safer surgery technique. In this study, we compare minimally invasive CP(MI-CP) and Minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal DP(MI-SpSTDP) to figure out the short-term and long-term outcomes of MI-CP. Methods: From March 2007 to June 2020, 36 cases of MI-SpSTDP and 23 cases of MI-CP were performed for benign and borderline malignant pancreatic tumors in Severance hospital. The occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and Clavian-Dindo classification grade 3 or more in the two group was investigated, and the Controlling nutritional status scores(CONUT score) before and 1-year after surgery were compared to determine the long-term outcomes of exocrine function. Results: There was no difference in postoperative complications including POPF between the two groups(17.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.294). And there were no statistical differences in either the MI-CP group (0.74 ± 0.75 vs. 0.78 ± 0.99, p = 0.803) or the MI-SpSTDP group (0.86 ± 0.83 to 0.61 ± 0.59, p = 0.071). Conclusions: MI-CP had longer operation time and hospital stay and is safe and effective in preserving endocrine and exocrine functions in treatment of benign or borderline tumors located at the neck or proximal body of the pancreas.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958422011988Central pancreatectomyMinimally invasive surgeryPancreasPancreatic fistula
spellingShingle Dawn Jung
Hassaan Bari
Ho Kyoung Hwang
Woo Jung Lee
Chang Moo Kang
Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy
Asian Journal of Surgery
Central pancreatectomy
Minimally invasive surgery
Pancreas
Pancreatic fistula
title Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy
title_full Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy
title_fullStr Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy
title_short Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy
title_sort short and long term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy comparison with minimally invasive spleen preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy
topic Central pancreatectomy
Minimally invasive surgery
Pancreas
Pancreatic fistula
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958422011988
work_keys_str_mv AT dawnjung shortandlongtermoutcomesofminimallyinvasivecentralpancreatectomycomparisonwithminimallyinvasivespleenpreservingsubtotaldistalpancreatectomy
AT hassaanbari shortandlongtermoutcomesofminimallyinvasivecentralpancreatectomycomparisonwithminimallyinvasivespleenpreservingsubtotaldistalpancreatectomy
AT hokyounghwang shortandlongtermoutcomesofminimallyinvasivecentralpancreatectomycomparisonwithminimallyinvasivespleenpreservingsubtotaldistalpancreatectomy
AT woojunglee shortandlongtermoutcomesofminimallyinvasivecentralpancreatectomycomparisonwithminimallyinvasivespleenpreservingsubtotaldistalpancreatectomy
AT changmookang shortandlongtermoutcomesofminimallyinvasivecentralpancreatectomycomparisonwithminimallyinvasivespleenpreservingsubtotaldistalpancreatectomy