Quantifying the model structural error in carbon cycle data assimilation systems

This study explores the impact of the structural error of biosphere models when assimilating net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measurements or CO<sub>2</sub> concentration measurements to optimise uncertain model parameters within carbon cycle data assimilation systems (CCDASs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Kuppel, F. Chevallier, P. Peylin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/45/2013/gmd-6-45-2013.pdf
Description
Summary:This study explores the impact of the structural error of biosphere models when assimilating net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measurements or CO<sub>2</sub> concentration measurements to optimise uncertain model parameters within carbon cycle data assimilation systems (CCDASs). This error has been proven difficult to identify and is often neglected in the total uncertainty budget. We propose a simple method which is derived from the model-minus-observation mismatch statistics. This diagnosis is applied to a state-of-the-art biogeochemical model using measurements of the net surface CO<sub>2</sub> flux at twelve sites located in temperate, deciduous, broadleaf forests. We find that the structural model error in the NEE space has a standard deviation of 1.5 to 1.7 gC m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, without a significant correlation structure beyond the lag of a few days, and a large spatial structure that can be approximated with an exponential decay of e-folding length of 500 km. In the space of concentrations, its characteristics are commensurate with the transport errors, both for surface air sample measurements and total column measurements. The inferred characteristics are confirmed by complementary optimality diagnostics performed after site-scale parameter optimisations.
ISSN:1991-959X
1991-9603