Applying the net-benefit framework for assessing cost-effectiveness of interventions towards universal health coverage
<p>Abstract</p> <p>In assessing the cost-effectiveness of an intervention, the interpretation and handling of uncertainties of the traditional summary measure, the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), can be problematic. This is particularly the case with strategies towards...
Main Authors: | Hounton Sennen, Newlands David |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-07-01
|
Series: | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/10/1/8 |
Similar Items
-
Applying the net-benefit framework for analyzing and presenting cost-effectiveness analysis of a maternal and newborn health intervention.
by: Sennen Hounton, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Assessing whether universal coverage with insecticide-treated nets has been achieved: is the right indicator being used?
by: Hannah Koenker, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Coverage outcomes (effects), costs, cost-effectiveness, and equity of two combinations of long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) distribution channels in Kenya: a two-arm study under operational conditions
by: Eve Worrall, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Introduction to the Special Issue on “The World Health Organization Choosing Interventions That Are Cost-Effective (WHO-CHOICE) Update”
by: Melanie Y. Bertram, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Advantages of the net benefit regression framework for trial-based economic evaluations of cancer treatments: an example from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.17 trial
by: Jeffrey S. Hoch, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)