The MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693

We present a stellar dynamical mass measurement of a newly detected supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the center of the fast-rotating, massive elliptical galaxy NGC 2693 as part of the MASSIVE survey. We combine high signal-to-noise ratio integral field spectroscopy (IFS) from the Gemini Multi-Objec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob D. Pilawa, Emily R. Liepold, Silvana C. Delgado Andrade, Jonelle L. Walsh, Chung-Pei Ma, Matthew E. Quenneville, Jenny E. Greene, John P. Blakeslee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac58fd
_version_ 1797361758295293952
author Jacob D. Pilawa
Emily R. Liepold
Silvana C. Delgado Andrade
Jonelle L. Walsh
Chung-Pei Ma
Matthew E. Quenneville
Jenny E. Greene
John P. Blakeslee
author_facet Jacob D. Pilawa
Emily R. Liepold
Silvana C. Delgado Andrade
Jonelle L. Walsh
Chung-Pei Ma
Matthew E. Quenneville
Jenny E. Greene
John P. Blakeslee
author_sort Jacob D. Pilawa
collection DOAJ
description We present a stellar dynamical mass measurement of a newly detected supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the center of the fast-rotating, massive elliptical galaxy NGC 2693 as part of the MASSIVE survey. We combine high signal-to-noise ratio integral field spectroscopy (IFS) from the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph with wide-field data from the Mitchell Spectrograph at McDonald Observatory to extract and model stellar kinematics of NGC 2693 from the central ∼150 pc out to ∼2.5 effective radii. Observations from Hubble Space Telescope WFC3 are used to determine the stellar light distribution. We perform fully triaxial Schwarzschild orbit modeling using the latest TriOS code and a Bayesian search in 6D galaxy model parameter space to determine NGC 2693's SMBH mass ( M _BH ), stellar mass-to-light ratio, dark matter content, and intrinsic shape. We find ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}=\left(1.7\pm 0.4\right)\times {10}^{9}\ {M}_{\odot }$ and a triaxial intrinsic shape with axis ratios p = b / a = 0.902 ± 0.009 and $q=c/a={0.721}_{-0.010}^{+0.011}$ , triaxiality parameter T = 0.39 ± 0.04. In comparison, the best-fit orbit model in the axisymmetric limit and (cylindrical) Jeans anisotropic model of NGC 2693 prefer ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}=\left(2.4\pm 0.6\right)\times {10}^{9}\ {M}_{\odot }$ and ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}=\left(2.9\pm 0.3\right)\times {10}^{9}\ {M}_{\odot }$ , respectively. Neither model can account for the non-axisymmetric stellar velocity features present in the IFS data.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:59:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed9462bf16994b29a51996c6d8e304db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-4357
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T15:59:02Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj.art-ed9462bf16994b29a51996c6d8e304db2024-01-08T14:40:04ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572022-01-01928217810.3847/1538-4357/ac58fdThe MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693Jacob D. Pilawa0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-9117Emily R. Liepold1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-7077Silvana C. Delgado Andrade2Jonelle L. Walsh3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-5908Chung-Pei Ma4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4430-102XMatthew E. Quenneville5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6148-5481Jenny E. Greene6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5612-3427John P. Blakeslee7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-3548Department of Astronomy, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ; jacobpilawa@berkeley.eduDepartment of Astronomy, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ; jacobpilawa@berkeley.edu; Department of Physics, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USAGeorge P. and Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX 77843, USAGeorge P. and Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Astronomy, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ; jacobpilawa@berkeley.edu; Department of Physics, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Astronomy, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ; jacobpilawa@berkeley.edu; Department of Physics, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University , Princeton, NJ 08544, USANSF’s NOIRLab , Tucson, AZ 85719, USAWe present a stellar dynamical mass measurement of a newly detected supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the center of the fast-rotating, massive elliptical galaxy NGC 2693 as part of the MASSIVE survey. We combine high signal-to-noise ratio integral field spectroscopy (IFS) from the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph with wide-field data from the Mitchell Spectrograph at McDonald Observatory to extract and model stellar kinematics of NGC 2693 from the central ∼150 pc out to ∼2.5 effective radii. Observations from Hubble Space Telescope WFC3 are used to determine the stellar light distribution. We perform fully triaxial Schwarzschild orbit modeling using the latest TriOS code and a Bayesian search in 6D galaxy model parameter space to determine NGC 2693's SMBH mass ( M _BH ), stellar mass-to-light ratio, dark matter content, and intrinsic shape. We find ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}=\left(1.7\pm 0.4\right)\times {10}^{9}\ {M}_{\odot }$ and a triaxial intrinsic shape with axis ratios p = b / a = 0.902 ± 0.009 and $q=c/a={0.721}_{-0.010}^{+0.011}$ , triaxiality parameter T = 0.39 ± 0.04. In comparison, the best-fit orbit model in the axisymmetric limit and (cylindrical) Jeans anisotropic model of NGC 2693 prefer ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}=\left(2.4\pm 0.6\right)\times {10}^{9}\ {M}_{\odot }$ and ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}=\left(2.9\pm 0.3\right)\times {10}^{9}\ {M}_{\odot }$ , respectively. Neither model can account for the non-axisymmetric stellar velocity features present in the IFS data.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac58fdGalaxy dynamicsGalaxy massesSupermassive black holesEarly-type galaxiesGalaxiesGalaxy dark matter halos
spellingShingle Jacob D. Pilawa
Emily R. Liepold
Silvana C. Delgado Andrade
Jonelle L. Walsh
Chung-Pei Ma
Matthew E. Quenneville
Jenny E. Greene
John P. Blakeslee
The MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxy dynamics
Galaxy masses
Supermassive black holes
Early-type galaxies
Galaxies
Galaxy dark matter halos
title The MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693
title_full The MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693
title_fullStr The MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693
title_full_unstemmed The MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693
title_short The MASSIVE Survey. XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693
title_sort massive survey xvii a triaxial orbit based determination of the black hole mass and intrinsic shape of elliptical galaxy ngc 2693
topic Galaxy dynamics
Galaxy masses
Supermassive black holes
Early-type galaxies
Galaxies
Galaxy dark matter halos
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac58fd
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobdpilawa themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT emilyrliepold themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT silvanacdelgadoandrade themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT jonellelwalsh themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT chungpeima themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT matthewequenneville themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT jennyegreene themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT johnpblakeslee themassivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT jacobdpilawa massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT emilyrliepold massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT silvanacdelgadoandrade massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT jonellelwalsh massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT chungpeima massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT matthewequenneville massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT jennyegreene massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693
AT johnpblakeslee massivesurveyxviiatriaxialorbitbaseddeterminationoftheblackholemassandintrinsicshapeofellipticalgalaxyngc2693