Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in Hawaii

Feral cats (Felis catus) are abundant in many parts of the world and pose a threat to native wildlife. Human–wildlife conflicts regarding how feral cats should be managed have increased recently. In Hawaii, previous research has revealed that most residents would like to see the feral cat abundance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheryl A. Lohr, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Linda J. Cox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utah State University 2017-01-01
Series:Human-Wildlife Interactions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/6
_version_ 1811266377788424192
author Cheryl A. Lohr
Christopher A. Lepczyk
Linda J. Cox
author_facet Cheryl A. Lohr
Christopher A. Lepczyk
Linda J. Cox
author_sort Cheryl A. Lohr
collection DOAJ
description Feral cats (Felis catus) are abundant in many parts of the world and pose a threat to native wildlife. Human–wildlife conflicts regarding how feral cats should be managed have increased recently. In Hawaii, previous research has revealed that most residents would like to see the feral cat abundance reduced, but opinions differ regarding which techniques are acceptable for achieving this. This paper describes an analytical hierarchy process that combines rankings of decision criteria by Hawaii’s residents with expert knowledge of the costs and benefits associated with 7 techniques (live-capture and adoption, live-capture and lethal injection, live-capture and lethal gunshot, trap-neuter-release [TNR]), lethal traps, predatorproof fence, and sharpshooter) for reducing feral cat abundance. We used a state-wide survey with 1,369 respondents and in-person surveys with 11 wildlife professionals to gather data for the model. Inconsistency values were below 0.1 for data from both the state-wide survey and the survey of wildlife professionals. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the model was not sensitive to changes in the public’s ranking of the decision criteria, because when data were averaged all decision criteria became equally important. The final ranking of the management techniques was dominated by the costs and benefits of each technique. Lethal traps were ranked as the best technique, and TNR was ranked as the worst technique.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:42:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-edb1d6d084534605aebb0845ba6be8da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2155-3874
2155-3874
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:42:07Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Utah State University
record_format Article
series Human-Wildlife Interactions
spelling doaj.art-edb1d6d084534605aebb0845ba6be8da2022-12-22T03:17:24ZengUtah State UniversityHuman-Wildlife Interactions2155-38742155-38742017-01-018110.26077/kjde-bm19Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in HawaiiCheryl A. Lohr0Christopher A. Lepczyk1Linda J. Cox2University of HawaiiUniversity of HawaiiUniversity of HawaiiFeral cats (Felis catus) are abundant in many parts of the world and pose a threat to native wildlife. Human–wildlife conflicts regarding how feral cats should be managed have increased recently. In Hawaii, previous research has revealed that most residents would like to see the feral cat abundance reduced, but opinions differ regarding which techniques are acceptable for achieving this. This paper describes an analytical hierarchy process that combines rankings of decision criteria by Hawaii’s residents with expert knowledge of the costs and benefits associated with 7 techniques (live-capture and adoption, live-capture and lethal injection, live-capture and lethal gunshot, trap-neuter-release [TNR]), lethal traps, predatorproof fence, and sharpshooter) for reducing feral cat abundance. We used a state-wide survey with 1,369 respondents and in-person surveys with 11 wildlife professionals to gather data for the model. Inconsistency values were below 0.1 for data from both the state-wide survey and the survey of wildlife professionals. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the model was not sensitive to changes in the public’s ranking of the decision criteria, because when data were averaged all decision criteria became equally important. The final ranking of the management techniques was dominated by the costs and benefits of each technique. Lethal traps were ranked as the best technique, and TNR was ranked as the worst technique.https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/6analytical hierarchy processexpert knowledgehuman–wildlife conflictsmulticriteria decision makingstructured decision makingtrap-neuter-releasewildlife management
spellingShingle Cheryl A. Lohr
Christopher A. Lepczyk
Linda J. Cox
Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in Hawaii
Human-Wildlife Interactions
analytical hierarchy process
expert knowledge
human–wildlife conflicts
multicriteria decision making
structured decision making
trap-neuter-release
wildlife management
title Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in Hawaii
title_full Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in Hawaii
title_fullStr Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in Hawaii
title_full_unstemmed Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in Hawaii
title_short Identifying people’s most preferred management technique for feral cats in Hawaii
title_sort identifying people s most preferred management technique for feral cats in hawaii
topic analytical hierarchy process
expert knowledge
human–wildlife conflicts
multicriteria decision making
structured decision making
trap-neuter-release
wildlife management
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT cherylalohr identifyingpeoplesmostpreferredmanagementtechniqueforferalcatsinhawaii
AT christopheralepczyk identifyingpeoplesmostpreferredmanagementtechniqueforferalcatsinhawaii
AT lindajcox identifyingpeoplesmostpreferredmanagementtechniqueforferalcatsinhawaii