Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial

Abstract Background Sildenafil is the drug of choice for neonatal pulmonary hypertension in developing countries where inhaled nitric oxide is not available. Available as oral and intravenous preparation – no study has been done in the past to compare the two forms. Each has its own benefits – but r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chinmay Chetan, Pradeep Suryawanshi, Suprabha Patnaik, Naharmal B. Soni, Chandra Rath, Prince Pareek, Bhvya Gupta, Reema Garegrat, Arjun Verma, Yogen Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03366-3
_version_ 1818207491877502976
author Chinmay Chetan
Pradeep Suryawanshi
Suprabha Patnaik
Naharmal B. Soni
Chandra Rath
Prince Pareek
Bhvya Gupta
Reema Garegrat
Arjun Verma
Yogen Singh
author_facet Chinmay Chetan
Pradeep Suryawanshi
Suprabha Patnaik
Naharmal B. Soni
Chandra Rath
Prince Pareek
Bhvya Gupta
Reema Garegrat
Arjun Verma
Yogen Singh
author_sort Chinmay Chetan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Sildenafil is the drug of choice for neonatal pulmonary hypertension in developing countries where inhaled nitric oxide is not available. Available as oral and intravenous preparation – no study has been done in the past to compare the two forms. Each has its own benefits – but requires comparison in terms of efficacy and safety. This study was done to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) sildenafil in infants with mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension. Methods An open labelled randomized trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit of urban tertiary hospital in western India between February 2019 to December 2020. Infants born after 34 weeks of gestation with Pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) > 25 mm Hg measured by echocardiography, within 72 h of birth, were enrolled for the study. Participants were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil either orally or by intravenous route. Primary outcome was the time taken for PAP to decrease below 25 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were time taken for oxygenation index to decrease by 25%, duration of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, nasal oxygen, hospital stay, time to achieve full feeds, mortality, and side effects. Results Forty patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of neonates in both groups were similar except for APGAR scores at 1 min and 5 min, with oral group having lower score [MEDIAN (IQR) 5.00 (4.00- 7.00) and 7.00 (6.00- 8.00)] compared to IV group [MEDIAN (IQR) 7.00 (6.00–8.00) and 9.00 (8.00–9.00)] respectively. Time taken for PAP to decrease below 25 mm was not statistically different between the oral and intravenous groups. Systemic hypotension occurred in 4 neonates of the intravenous group but none in the oral group. Conclusion Oral and intravenous sildenafil had equal efficacy at reducing PAP in neonatal pulmonary hypertension, albeit intravenous sildenafil use was associated with a greater complication rate. Trial registration Trial was registered in the clinical trials registry of India [ CTRI/2019/04/018781 ][25/04/2019].
first_indexed 2024-12-12T04:29:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-edb22f8e3d1648a4b9583fb549ee5f6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T04:29:46Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-edb22f8e3d1648a4b9583fb549ee5f6e2022-12-22T00:38:06ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312022-05-012211710.1186/s12887-022-03366-3Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trialChinmay Chetan0Pradeep Suryawanshi1Suprabha Patnaik2Naharmal B. Soni3Chandra Rath4Prince Pareek5Bhvya Gupta6Reema Garegrat7Arjun Verma8Yogen Singh9Department of Neonatology, Himalayan Institute of Medical SciencesDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical CollegeDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical CollegeDepartment of Neonatology, Sidra MedicineDepartment of Neonatology, Perth Children’s HospitalDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical CollegeSparsh Superspeciality HospitalDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical CollegeDepartment of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical CollegeDivision of Neonatology, Loma Linda University School of MedicineAbstract Background Sildenafil is the drug of choice for neonatal pulmonary hypertension in developing countries where inhaled nitric oxide is not available. Available as oral and intravenous preparation – no study has been done in the past to compare the two forms. Each has its own benefits – but requires comparison in terms of efficacy and safety. This study was done to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) sildenafil in infants with mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension. Methods An open labelled randomized trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit of urban tertiary hospital in western India between February 2019 to December 2020. Infants born after 34 weeks of gestation with Pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) > 25 mm Hg measured by echocardiography, within 72 h of birth, were enrolled for the study. Participants were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil either orally or by intravenous route. Primary outcome was the time taken for PAP to decrease below 25 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were time taken for oxygenation index to decrease by 25%, duration of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, nasal oxygen, hospital stay, time to achieve full feeds, mortality, and side effects. Results Forty patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of neonates in both groups were similar except for APGAR scores at 1 min and 5 min, with oral group having lower score [MEDIAN (IQR) 5.00 (4.00- 7.00) and 7.00 (6.00- 8.00)] compared to IV group [MEDIAN (IQR) 7.00 (6.00–8.00) and 9.00 (8.00–9.00)] respectively. Time taken for PAP to decrease below 25 mm was not statistically different between the oral and intravenous groups. Systemic hypotension occurred in 4 neonates of the intravenous group but none in the oral group. Conclusion Oral and intravenous sildenafil had equal efficacy at reducing PAP in neonatal pulmonary hypertension, albeit intravenous sildenafil use was associated with a greater complication rate. Trial registration Trial was registered in the clinical trials registry of India [ CTRI/2019/04/018781 ][25/04/2019].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03366-3Intravenous sildenafilNeonatesOral sildenafilPulmonary Hypertension
spellingShingle Chinmay Chetan
Pradeep Suryawanshi
Suprabha Patnaik
Naharmal B. Soni
Chandra Rath
Prince Pareek
Bhvya Gupta
Reema Garegrat
Arjun Verma
Yogen Singh
Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
BMC Pediatrics
Intravenous sildenafil
Neonates
Oral sildenafil
Pulmonary Hypertension
title Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
title_full Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
title_fullStr Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
title_short Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
title_sort oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates a randomized trial
topic Intravenous sildenafil
Neonates
Oral sildenafil
Pulmonary Hypertension
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03366-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chinmaychetan oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT pradeepsuryawanshi oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT suprabhapatnaik oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT naharmalbsoni oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT chandrarath oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT princepareek oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT bhvyagupta oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT reemagaregrat oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT arjunverma oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial
AT yogensingh oralversusintravenoussildenafilforpulmonaryhypertensioninneonatesarandomizedtrial