Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data

Electromagnetic (EM) tracking has been used to quantify biomechanical parameters of the lower limb and lumbar spine during ergometer rowing to improve performance and reduce injury. Optical motion capture (OMC) is potentially better suited to measure comprehensive whole-body dynamics in rowing. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caryn A. Urbanczyk, Alessandro Bonfiglio, Alison H. McGregor, Anthony M.J. Bull
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:International Biomechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2021.2003719
_version_ 1818966859324588032
author Caryn A. Urbanczyk
Alessandro Bonfiglio
Alison H. McGregor
Anthony M.J. Bull
author_facet Caryn A. Urbanczyk
Alessandro Bonfiglio
Alison H. McGregor
Anthony M.J. Bull
author_sort Caryn A. Urbanczyk
collection DOAJ
description Electromagnetic (EM) tracking has been used to quantify biomechanical parameters of the lower limb and lumbar spine during ergometer rowing to improve performance and reduce injury. Optical motion capture (OMC) is potentially better suited to measure comprehensive whole-body dynamics in rowing. This study compared accuracy and precision of EM and OMC displacements by simultaneously recording kinematics during rowing trials at low, middle, and high rates on an instrumented ergometer (n=12). Trajectories calculated from OMC and EM sensors attached to the pelvis, lumbar spine, and right leg were highly correlated, but EM tracking lagged behind ergometer and OMC tracking by approximately 6%, yielding large RMS errors. When this phase-lag was corrected by least squares minimization, agreement between systems improved. Both systems demonstrated an ability to adequately track large dynamic compound movements in the sagittal plane but struggled at times to precisely track small displacements and narrow angular ranges in medial/lateral and superior/inferior directions. An OMC based tracking methodology can obtain equivalence with a previously validated EM system, for spine and lower limb metrics. Improvements in speed and consistency of data acquisition with OMC are beneficial for dynamic motion studies. Compatibility ensures continuity by maintaining the ability to compare to prior work.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T13:39:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-edb27ee6561f406fb52fe206f6b2102d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-5432
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T13:39:36Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Biomechanics
spelling doaj.art-edb27ee6561f406fb52fe206f6b2102d2022-12-21T19:38:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Biomechanics2333-54322021-01-0181758410.1080/23335432.2021.20037192003719Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics dataCaryn A. Urbanczyk0Alessandro Bonfiglio1Alison H. McGregor2Anthony M.J. Bull3Imperial College LondonImperial College LondonImperial College LondonImperial College LondonElectromagnetic (EM) tracking has been used to quantify biomechanical parameters of the lower limb and lumbar spine during ergometer rowing to improve performance and reduce injury. Optical motion capture (OMC) is potentially better suited to measure comprehensive whole-body dynamics in rowing. This study compared accuracy and precision of EM and OMC displacements by simultaneously recording kinematics during rowing trials at low, middle, and high rates on an instrumented ergometer (n=12). Trajectories calculated from OMC and EM sensors attached to the pelvis, lumbar spine, and right leg were highly correlated, but EM tracking lagged behind ergometer and OMC tracking by approximately 6%, yielding large RMS errors. When this phase-lag was corrected by least squares minimization, agreement between systems improved. Both systems demonstrated an ability to adequately track large dynamic compound movements in the sagittal plane but struggled at times to precisely track small displacements and narrow angular ranges in medial/lateral and superior/inferior directions. An OMC based tracking methodology can obtain equivalence with a previously validated EM system, for spine and lower limb metrics. Improvements in speed and consistency of data acquisition with OMC are beneficial for dynamic motion studies. Compatibility ensures continuity by maintaining the ability to compare to prior work.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2021.2003719optical motion captureelectromagnetic motion trackingkinematicsrowing
spellingShingle Caryn A. Urbanczyk
Alessandro Bonfiglio
Alison H. McGregor
Anthony M.J. Bull
Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data
International Biomechanics
optical motion capture
electromagnetic motion tracking
kinematics
rowing
title Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data
title_full Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data
title_fullStr Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data
title_full_unstemmed Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data
title_short Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data
title_sort comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data
topic optical motion capture
electromagnetic motion tracking
kinematics
rowing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2021.2003719
work_keys_str_mv AT carynaurbanczyk comparingopticalandelectromagnetictrackingsystemstofacilitatecompatibilityinsportskinematicsdata
AT alessandrobonfiglio comparingopticalandelectromagnetictrackingsystemstofacilitatecompatibilityinsportskinematicsdata
AT alisonhmcgregor comparingopticalandelectromagnetictrackingsystemstofacilitatecompatibilityinsportskinematicsdata
AT anthonymjbull comparingopticalandelectromagnetictrackingsystemstofacilitatecompatibilityinsportskinematicsdata