Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Background: Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) involves a series of steps to identify conservation areas and develop management strategies, incorporating feedbacks, revisions, and iterations at any stage. It is a valuable tool in facilitating the effective implementation of Ecosystem-Based Marin...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | Open Research Europe |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/3-136/v1 |
| _version_ | 1797317689363922944 |
|---|---|
| author | Wesley Flannery Ben McAteer Dimitra Petza Emna Ben Lamine Francesco Colloca Erika Fabbrizzi Ibon Galparsoro Simonetta Fraschetti Maren Kruse Stelios Katsanevakis Vanessa Stelzenmüller Michael Elliot Sylvaine Giakoumi Esther Domínguez Crisóstomo |
| author_facet | Wesley Flannery Ben McAteer Dimitra Petza Emna Ben Lamine Francesco Colloca Erika Fabbrizzi Ibon Galparsoro Simonetta Fraschetti Maren Kruse Stelios Katsanevakis Vanessa Stelzenmüller Michael Elliot Sylvaine Giakoumi Esther Domínguez Crisóstomo |
| author_sort | Wesley Flannery |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) involves a series of steps to identify conservation areas and develop management strategies, incorporating feedbacks, revisions, and iterations at any stage. It is a valuable tool in facilitating the effective implementation of Ecosystem-Based Marine Spatial Planning (EB-MSP). However, few efforts have been carried out to summarize information on methods, trends, and progress in SCP in the designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The present work aims at providing the protocol to perform a scoping review (ScR) to assess the contribution of SCP to the design of effective MPA networks, identifying both the development of good practices and the presence of gaps of knowledge in terms of criteria for their implementation. Protocol: The ScR will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for ScRs supported the definition of this protocol. The three databases Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar will be used for the bibliographic search. Inclusion criteria will be as follows: studies applying SCP in the marine realms worldwide, assessing its contribution to the design of MPA networks. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature will be considered for eligibility. No search limitations will be applied regarding publications’ year, stage, subject area and source type. Studies in English, French, German, Greek, Italian, and Spanish will be reviewed. Grey literature will be sourced from pre-print archives, institutional websites and other web-based search engines. The Covidence software will be used for the process of documents selection and data extraction. The findings of the ScR will be presented through tables, graphs, and maps, accompanied by a narrative summary of the outcomes. Conclusions: This comprehensive approach will provide a visual representation of the data, enhancing the understanding and interpretation of the results. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T03:39:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-edb59a77bda744ce99647e09ad21e341 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2732-5121 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T03:39:36Z |
| publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
| publisher | F1000 Research Ltd |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Open Research Europe |
| spelling | doaj.art-edb59a77bda744ce99647e09ad21e3412024-02-10T01:00:17ZengF1000 Research LtdOpen Research Europe2732-51212023-09-01317597Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]Wesley Flannery0Ben McAteer1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-8141Dimitra Petza2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0910-8125Emna Ben Lamine3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9386-0186Francesco Colloca4Erika Fabbrizzi5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0753-1803Ibon Galparsoro6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5031-525XSimonetta Fraschetti7Maren Kruse8https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-3649Stelios Katsanevakis9Vanessa Stelzenmüller10Michael Elliot11Sylvaine Giakoumi12Esther Domínguez Crisóstomo13https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5147-9727Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UKQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UKDepartment of Marine Sciences, The University of the Aegean, Mytilene, 81100, GreeceUniversite Cote d'Azur, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, FranceIntegrative Marine Ecology Department, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Rome, 00198, ItalyDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Campania, ItalyMarine Research Division, AZTI Foundation, Pasaia, Euskadi, 20110, SpainDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Campania, ItalyThünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Bremerhaven, 27572, GermanyDepartment of Marine Sciences, The University of the Aegean, Mytilene, 81100, GreeceThünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Bremerhaven, 27572, GermanyInstitute for Estuarine and Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Hull, England, UKSicily Marine Centre, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Palermo, Sicily, 90149, ItalyDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Campania, ItalyBackground: Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) involves a series of steps to identify conservation areas and develop management strategies, incorporating feedbacks, revisions, and iterations at any stage. It is a valuable tool in facilitating the effective implementation of Ecosystem-Based Marine Spatial Planning (EB-MSP). However, few efforts have been carried out to summarize information on methods, trends, and progress in SCP in the designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The present work aims at providing the protocol to perform a scoping review (ScR) to assess the contribution of SCP to the design of effective MPA networks, identifying both the development of good practices and the presence of gaps of knowledge in terms of criteria for their implementation. Protocol: The ScR will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for ScRs supported the definition of this protocol. The three databases Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar will be used for the bibliographic search. Inclusion criteria will be as follows: studies applying SCP in the marine realms worldwide, assessing its contribution to the design of MPA networks. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature will be considered for eligibility. No search limitations will be applied regarding publications’ year, stage, subject area and source type. Studies in English, French, German, Greek, Italian, and Spanish will be reviewed. Grey literature will be sourced from pre-print archives, institutional websites and other web-based search engines. The Covidence software will be used for the process of documents selection and data extraction. The findings of the ScR will be presented through tables, graphs, and maps, accompanied by a narrative summary of the outcomes. Conclusions: This comprehensive approach will provide a visual representation of the data, enhancing the understanding and interpretation of the results.https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/3-136/v1Systematic Conservation Planning Marine Protected Area networks Ecosystem-Based Marine Spatial Management climate change connectivity restorationeng |
| spellingShingle | Wesley Flannery Ben McAteer Dimitra Petza Emna Ben Lamine Francesco Colloca Erika Fabbrizzi Ibon Galparsoro Simonetta Fraschetti Maren Kruse Stelios Katsanevakis Vanessa Stelzenmüller Michael Elliot Sylvaine Giakoumi Esther Domínguez Crisóstomo Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] Open Research Europe Systematic Conservation Planning Marine Protected Area networks Ecosystem-Based Marine Spatial Management climate change connectivity restoration eng |
| title | Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
| title_full | Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
| title_fullStr | Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
| title_short | Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
| title_sort | current practices in marine systematic conservation planning protocol for a global scoping review version 1 peer review 2 approved |
| topic | Systematic Conservation Planning Marine Protected Area networks Ecosystem-Based Marine Spatial Management climate change connectivity restoration eng |
| url | https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/3-136/v1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wesleyflannery currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT benmcateer currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT dimitrapetza currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT emnabenlamine currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT francescocolloca currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT erikafabbrizzi currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT ibongalparsoro currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT simonettafraschetti currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT marenkruse currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT stelioskatsanevakis currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT vanessastelzenmuller currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT michaelelliot currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT sylvainegiakoumi currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved AT estherdominguezcrisostomo currentpracticesinmarinesystematicconservationplanningprotocolforaglobalscopingreviewversion1peerreview2approved |