Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in Cat
Gel technology is widely used for blood typing in human medicine. It has a number of advantages over routine tube testing, including standardization, stability, smaller sample volume, ease of performance and analysis, and speed. The aim of this study was to evaluate feline blood typing using the gel...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00312/full |
| _version_ | 1811273399580753920 |
|---|---|
| author | Eva Spada Roberta Perego Luciana Baggiani Daniela Proverbio |
| author_facet | Eva Spada Roberta Perego Luciana Baggiani Daniela Proverbio |
| author_sort | Eva Spada |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Gel technology is widely used for blood typing in human medicine. It has a number of advantages over routine tube testing, including standardization, stability, smaller sample volume, ease of performance and analysis, and speed. The aim of this study was to evaluate feline blood typing using the gel column technique. TUBE agglutination typing was performed in 143 feline blood samples from blood donors and recipients, healthy and sick patients, and whole-blood units anticoagulated with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid or citrate phosphate dextrose adenine. Plasma from type B cats was used as anti-A reagent, Triticum vulgaris lectin as anti-B reagent, and the control was saline solution. Agglutination in backtyping of types B and AB samples with type A red blood cells (RBCs) was used to confirm whether the samples were type B (presence of alloantibodies) or type AB (absence of alloantibodies). Blood typing in a neutral gel column technique (GEL) using the same anti-A and anti-B reagents was performed on duplicate samples. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, overall accuracy, and Cohen κ coefficient (κ) for GEL were calculated, with TUBE considered the gold standard technique. Of 143 samples typed with TUBE, 98 (68.5%) were type A, 25 (17.5%,) type B, and 20 (14.0%) type AB. Backtyping confirmed the categorization of all types B and AB samples. Of these samples, gel testing produced 115 (80.4%) concordant results; a mixed-field agglutination pattern (layers of RBCs at both the top and at the bottom of the gel in either the A or B gel column) was seen in 27 samples, and one type B sample was misidentified as type AB. If the mixed-field pattern was interpreted as a negative result, 141/143 (98.6%) samples showed concordant results with an overall accuracy of the GEL of 100.0% for type A, 98.9% for type B, and 99.1% for type AB. Strength of agreement was very good (κ = 0.97). When the same anti-A and anti-B reagents are used, GEL is a sensitive and specific method for blood typing feline samples. Until additional studies have been performed, mixed-field patterns obtained in GEL testing should be classified as negative results. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T22:58:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-edc272bee2f14d93b1a105eeb7773d95 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2297-1769 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T22:58:26Z |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-edc272bee2f14d93b1a105eeb7773d952022-12-22T03:13:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692020-06-01710.3389/fvets.2020.00312538193Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in CatEva SpadaRoberta PeregoLuciana BaggianiDaniela ProverbioGel technology is widely used for blood typing in human medicine. It has a number of advantages over routine tube testing, including standardization, stability, smaller sample volume, ease of performance and analysis, and speed. The aim of this study was to evaluate feline blood typing using the gel column technique. TUBE agglutination typing was performed in 143 feline blood samples from blood donors and recipients, healthy and sick patients, and whole-blood units anticoagulated with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid or citrate phosphate dextrose adenine. Plasma from type B cats was used as anti-A reagent, Triticum vulgaris lectin as anti-B reagent, and the control was saline solution. Agglutination in backtyping of types B and AB samples with type A red blood cells (RBCs) was used to confirm whether the samples were type B (presence of alloantibodies) or type AB (absence of alloantibodies). Blood typing in a neutral gel column technique (GEL) using the same anti-A and anti-B reagents was performed on duplicate samples. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, overall accuracy, and Cohen κ coefficient (κ) for GEL were calculated, with TUBE considered the gold standard technique. Of 143 samples typed with TUBE, 98 (68.5%) were type A, 25 (17.5%,) type B, and 20 (14.0%) type AB. Backtyping confirmed the categorization of all types B and AB samples. Of these samples, gel testing produced 115 (80.4%) concordant results; a mixed-field agglutination pattern (layers of RBCs at both the top and at the bottom of the gel in either the A or B gel column) was seen in 27 samples, and one type B sample was misidentified as type AB. If the mixed-field pattern was interpreted as a negative result, 141/143 (98.6%) samples showed concordant results with an overall accuracy of the GEL of 100.0% for type A, 98.9% for type B, and 99.1% for type AB. Strength of agreement was very good (κ = 0.97). When the same anti-A and anti-B reagents are used, GEL is a sensitive and specific method for blood typing feline samples. Until additional studies have been performed, mixed-field patterns obtained in GEL testing should be classified as negative results.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00312/fullcatblood groupblood-typing methodagglutinationtubegel |
| spellingShingle | Eva Spada Roberta Perego Luciana Baggiani Daniela Proverbio Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in Cat Frontiers in Veterinary Science cat blood group blood-typing method agglutination tube gel |
| title | Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in Cat |
| title_full | Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in Cat |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in Cat |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in Cat |
| title_short | Comparison of Conventional Tube and Gel-Based Agglutination Tests for AB System Blood Typing in Cat |
| title_sort | comparison of conventional tube and gel based agglutination tests for ab system blood typing in cat |
| topic | cat blood group blood-typing method agglutination tube gel |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00312/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT evaspada comparisonofconventionaltubeandgelbasedagglutinationtestsforabsystembloodtypingincat AT robertaperego comparisonofconventionaltubeandgelbasedagglutinationtestsforabsystembloodtypingincat AT lucianabaggiani comparisonofconventionaltubeandgelbasedagglutinationtestsforabsystembloodtypingincat AT danielaproverbio comparisonofconventionaltubeandgelbasedagglutinationtestsforabsystembloodtypingincat |