Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility

This study aimed to assess (1) the reproducibility of three sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) assays for sperm DNA fragmentation, i.e., LensHooke R10® (R10), Halosperm G2® (G2), and BASO® (BA); (2) the correlation between computer-assisted semen analyzer (CASA) morphokinematic parameters and sperm DN...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsin-Ta Lin, Meng-Hsing Wu, Weng-Ling Wu, Li-Chung Tsai, Yu-Ying Chen, Kuei-Hsiang Hung, Po-Hsuan Wu, Ta-Sheng Chen, Huang-Tz Ou, Yu-Sheng Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cjphysiology.org/article.asp?issn=0304-4920;year=2022;volume=65;issue=3;spage=143;epage=150;aulast=Lin
_version_ 1811295926492332032
author Hsin-Ta Lin
Meng-Hsing Wu
Weng-Ling Wu
Li-Chung Tsai
Yu-Ying Chen
Kuei-Hsiang Hung
Po-Hsuan Wu
Ta-Sheng Chen
Huang-Tz Ou
Yu-Sheng Cheng
author_facet Hsin-Ta Lin
Meng-Hsing Wu
Weng-Ling Wu
Li-Chung Tsai
Yu-Ying Chen
Kuei-Hsiang Hung
Po-Hsuan Wu
Ta-Sheng Chen
Huang-Tz Ou
Yu-Sheng Cheng
author_sort Hsin-Ta Lin
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to assess (1) the reproducibility of three sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) assays for sperm DNA fragmentation, i.e., LensHooke R10® (R10), Halosperm G2® (G2), and BASO® (BA); (2) the correlation between computer-assisted semen analyzer (CASA) morphokinematic parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI), and (3) the diagnostic value for male reproduction by combining semen morphokinematic parameters and DFI. Total 50 male participants were recruited, and all collected semen samples underwent semen analyses and SCD assays. Intra- and inter-observer variability of DFI data from different SCD measures was tested. In addition, the predictive ability of CASA parameters and DFI (with different cutoffs, i.e., 15% and 20%) for infertility was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We found that the G2 and R10 produced satisfactory variance coefficients (5.53%, 5.67%) compared to BA (14.8%). The DFI data from the R10 had lower intra-observer variability, in terms of higher intra-class coefficient (0.9615), than that of the G2 (0.8847) or BA (0.8824). Inter-observer variability of three SCD kits in scoring the DFI was comparable and satisfactory (concordance correlation coefficients ranging 0.9895–0.9630). The CASA parameters (i.e., total motility [r = −0.57], progression motility [r = −0.55], and rapidly progressive motility [r = −0.55]) were significantly correlated with DFI (P < 0.001). The predictive ability of the 15%-cutoff DFI data was better than that of the 20%-cutoff or continuous DFI data. The model comprising the CASA parameters, 15%-cutoff DFI, and 4%-cutoff normal morphology had the highest area under curve (0.8125) for infertility. For SCD assay, the R10 was the most reliable SCD assay to detect sperm DNA fragmentation. Combining the sperm DFI with CASA parameters might be a better diagnostic tool for male reproduction.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:39:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-edd007e9340e4bfd962076d665154d7d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0304-4920
2666-0059
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:39:55Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Chinese Journal of Physiology
spelling doaj.art-edd007e9340e4bfd962076d665154d7d2022-12-22T03:00:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsChinese Journal of Physiology0304-49202666-00592022-01-0165314315010.4103/CJP.CJP_12_22Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertilityHsin-Ta LinMeng-Hsing WuWeng-Ling WuLi-Chung TsaiYu-Ying ChenKuei-Hsiang HungPo-Hsuan WuTa-Sheng ChenHuang-Tz OuYu-Sheng ChengThis study aimed to assess (1) the reproducibility of three sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) assays for sperm DNA fragmentation, i.e., LensHooke R10® (R10), Halosperm G2® (G2), and BASO® (BA); (2) the correlation between computer-assisted semen analyzer (CASA) morphokinematic parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI), and (3) the diagnostic value for male reproduction by combining semen morphokinematic parameters and DFI. Total 50 male participants were recruited, and all collected semen samples underwent semen analyses and SCD assays. Intra- and inter-observer variability of DFI data from different SCD measures was tested. In addition, the predictive ability of CASA parameters and DFI (with different cutoffs, i.e., 15% and 20%) for infertility was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We found that the G2 and R10 produced satisfactory variance coefficients (5.53%, 5.67%) compared to BA (14.8%). The DFI data from the R10 had lower intra-observer variability, in terms of higher intra-class coefficient (0.9615), than that of the G2 (0.8847) or BA (0.8824). Inter-observer variability of three SCD kits in scoring the DFI was comparable and satisfactory (concordance correlation coefficients ranging 0.9895–0.9630). The CASA parameters (i.e., total motility [r = −0.57], progression motility [r = −0.55], and rapidly progressive motility [r = −0.55]) were significantly correlated with DFI (P < 0.001). The predictive ability of the 15%-cutoff DFI data was better than that of the 20%-cutoff or continuous DFI data. The model comprising the CASA parameters, 15%-cutoff DFI, and 4%-cutoff normal morphology had the highest area under curve (0.8125) for infertility. For SCD assay, the R10 was the most reliable SCD assay to detect sperm DNA fragmentation. Combining the sperm DFI with CASA parameters might be a better diagnostic tool for male reproduction.http://www.cjphysiology.org/article.asp?issn=0304-4920;year=2022;volume=65;issue=3;spage=143;epage=150;aulast=Lincomputer-assisted semen analyzerconventional semen analysisdna fragmentation indexmale infertilitysperm chromatin dispersion
spellingShingle Hsin-Ta Lin
Meng-Hsing Wu
Weng-Ling Wu
Li-Chung Tsai
Yu-Ying Chen
Kuei-Hsiang Hung
Po-Hsuan Wu
Ta-Sheng Chen
Huang-Tz Ou
Yu-Sheng Cheng
Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility
Chinese Journal of Physiology
computer-assisted semen analyzer
conventional semen analysis
dna fragmentation index
male infertility
sperm chromatin dispersion
title Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility
title_full Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility
title_fullStr Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility
title_short Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility
title_sort incorporating sperm dna fragmentation index with computer assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility
topic computer-assisted semen analyzer
conventional semen analysis
dna fragmentation index
male infertility
sperm chromatin dispersion
url http://www.cjphysiology.org/article.asp?issn=0304-4920;year=2022;volume=65;issue=3;spage=143;epage=150;aulast=Lin
work_keys_str_mv AT hsintalin incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT menghsingwu incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT wenglingwu incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT lichungtsai incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT yuyingchen incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT kueihsianghung incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT pohsuanwu incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT tashengchen incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT huangtzou incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility
AT yushengcheng incorporatingspermdnafragmentationindexwithcomputerassistedsemenmorphokinematicparametersasabetterwindowtomalefertility