Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia

Abstract Background Birds host several ectoparasitic fly species with negative effects on nestling health and reproductive output, and with the capability of transmitting avian blood parasites. Information on the abundance and distribution of the ectoparasitic fly genera Ornithomya (Hippoboscidae) a...

Cur síos iomlán

Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Príomhchruthaitheoirí: Tapio Eeva, Tommi Andersson, Åsa M. M. Berglund, Jon E. Brommer, Raimo Hyvönen, Tero Klemola, Toni Laaksonen, Olli Loukola, Chiara Morosinotto, Kalle Rainio, Päivi M. Sirkiä, Eero J. Vesterinen
Formáid: Alt
Teanga:English
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: BMC 2015-12-01
Sraith:Parasites & Vectors
Ábhair:
Rochtain ar líne:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1267-6
_version_ 1827933734729416704
author Tapio Eeva
Tommi Andersson
Åsa M. M. Berglund
Jon E. Brommer
Raimo Hyvönen
Tero Klemola
Toni Laaksonen
Olli Loukola
Chiara Morosinotto
Kalle Rainio
Päivi M. Sirkiä
Eero J. Vesterinen
author_facet Tapio Eeva
Tommi Andersson
Åsa M. M. Berglund
Jon E. Brommer
Raimo Hyvönen
Tero Klemola
Toni Laaksonen
Olli Loukola
Chiara Morosinotto
Kalle Rainio
Päivi M. Sirkiä
Eero J. Vesterinen
author_sort Tapio Eeva
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Birds host several ectoparasitic fly species with negative effects on nestling health and reproductive output, and with the capability of transmitting avian blood parasites. Information on the abundance and distribution of the ectoparasitic fly genera Ornithomya (Hippoboscidae) and Protocalliphora (Calliphoridae) in northern Europe is still generally poor, and we thus explored their geographic range and occurrence of these flies in the nests of a common avian model species, the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Methods Nests of F. hypoleuca were collected from 21 locations across Fennoscandia in summer 2013, across a latitudinal gradient (between 56 °N – 70 °N) and examined for the presence of fly puparia. Adult specimens of Ornithomya spp. were also collected for species identification. Fly species were identified morphologically and identifications confirmed with DNA barcoding. Results We found three species: two louse-flies − Ornithomya chloropus and O. avicularia − and one blow-fly, Protocalliphora azurea. The prevalence of O. avicularia was higher in southern latitudes and this species was not encountered beyond 62 °N whereas O. chloropus and P. azurea occurred across the whole range of latitudes. The prevalence of O. chloropus further increased with increasing distance from the coast – a pattern not documented before. The three fly species showed no interspecific associations in their prevalence. Conclusions Our study revealed relatively high prevalence for all the species (O. chloropus 59 %, O. avicularia 20 %, P. azurea 32 %), and an interesting spatial pattern in the prevalence of the two louse fly species. Our sample did not indicate any major range shifts towards the north for the southern species as compared to the information from the past. Morphological identification of O. chloropus did not match with the corresponding sequences published in the GenBank and taxonomy of this group calls for further studies.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:28:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-edef9ab19e6646c6b2e8bf7f1bd13241
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-3305
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:28:57Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Parasites & Vectors
spelling doaj.art-edef9ab19e6646c6b2e8bf7f1bd132412023-06-04T11:14:51ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052015-12-01811910.1186/s13071-015-1267-6Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in FennoscandiaTapio Eeva0Tommi Andersson1Åsa M. M. Berglund2Jon E. Brommer3Raimo HyvönenTero Klemola4Toni Laaksonen5Olli Loukola6Chiara Morosinotto7Kalle Rainio8Päivi M. Sirkiä9Eero J. Vesterinen10Department of Biology, University of TurkuKevo Subarctic Research Institute, University of TurkuDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Biology, University of TurkuDepartment of Biology, University of TurkuDepartment of Biology, University of TurkuDepartment of Biology, University of OuluDepartment of Biology, University of TurkuDepartment of Biology, University of TurkuDepartment of Biology, University of TurkuDepartment of Biology, University of TurkuAbstract Background Birds host several ectoparasitic fly species with negative effects on nestling health and reproductive output, and with the capability of transmitting avian blood parasites. Information on the abundance and distribution of the ectoparasitic fly genera Ornithomya (Hippoboscidae) and Protocalliphora (Calliphoridae) in northern Europe is still generally poor, and we thus explored their geographic range and occurrence of these flies in the nests of a common avian model species, the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Methods Nests of F. hypoleuca were collected from 21 locations across Fennoscandia in summer 2013, across a latitudinal gradient (between 56 °N – 70 °N) and examined for the presence of fly puparia. Adult specimens of Ornithomya spp. were also collected for species identification. Fly species were identified morphologically and identifications confirmed with DNA barcoding. Results We found three species: two louse-flies − Ornithomya chloropus and O. avicularia − and one blow-fly, Protocalliphora azurea. The prevalence of O. avicularia was higher in southern latitudes and this species was not encountered beyond 62 °N whereas O. chloropus and P. azurea occurred across the whole range of latitudes. The prevalence of O. chloropus further increased with increasing distance from the coast – a pattern not documented before. The three fly species showed no interspecific associations in their prevalence. Conclusions Our study revealed relatively high prevalence for all the species (O. chloropus 59 %, O. avicularia 20 %, P. azurea 32 %), and an interesting spatial pattern in the prevalence of the two louse fly species. Our sample did not indicate any major range shifts towards the north for the southern species as compared to the information from the past. Morphological identification of O. chloropus did not match with the corresponding sequences published in the GenBank and taxonomy of this group calls for further studies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1267-6Blood parasitesBird blowfliesEctoparasite prevalenceLouse fliesPied flycatcher
spellingShingle Tapio Eeva
Tommi Andersson
Åsa M. M. Berglund
Jon E. Brommer
Raimo Hyvönen
Tero Klemola
Toni Laaksonen
Olli Loukola
Chiara Morosinotto
Kalle Rainio
Päivi M. Sirkiä
Eero J. Vesterinen
Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia
Parasites & Vectors
Blood parasites
Bird blowflies
Ectoparasite prevalence
Louse flies
Pied flycatcher
title Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia
title_full Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia
title_fullStr Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia
title_full_unstemmed Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia
title_short Species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies (Diptera) in pied flycatcher nests in Fennoscandia
title_sort species and abundance of ectoparasitic flies diptera in pied flycatcher nests in fennoscandia
topic Blood parasites
Bird blowflies
Ectoparasite prevalence
Louse flies
Pied flycatcher
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1267-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tapioeeva speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT tommiandersson speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT asammberglund speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT jonebrommer speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT raimohyvonen speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT teroklemola speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT tonilaaksonen speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT olliloukola speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT chiaramorosinotto speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT kallerainio speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT paivimsirkia speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia
AT eerojvesterinen speciesandabundanceofectoparasiticfliesdipterainpiedflycatchernestsinfennoscandia