GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS
An investigation into the implementation state of open standards in software is currently ongoing through the ISPRS/EuroSDR ‘GeoBIM benchmark 2019’ initiative, which kicked off earlier this year. The benchmark activity provides a way of assessing and comparing the functionality of different software...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| Online Access: | https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-4-W15/47/2019/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W15-47-2019.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818158962250350592 |
|---|---|
| author | F. Noardo F. Biljecki G. Agugiaro K. Arroyo Ohori C. Ellul L. Harrie J. Stoter |
| author_facet | F. Noardo F. Biljecki G. Agugiaro K. Arroyo Ohori C. Ellul L. Harrie J. Stoter |
| author_sort | F. Noardo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | An investigation into the implementation state of open standards in software is currently ongoing through the ISPRS/EuroSDR ‘GeoBIM benchmark 2019’ initiative, which kicked off earlier this year. The benchmark activity provides a way of assessing and comparing the functionality of different software packages in GIS and BIM in terms of their ability to handle standardised data (IFC and CityGML) and undertake various tasks using this data. Approximately 65 people have registered to participate so far, with participants from a wide range of backgrounds and proposing to test a variety of software packages. This confirms that the issues under investigation are of interest, and also meets the wider benchmark aim of having a variety of participants, since the project is conceived as using a bottom-up approach with cross-disciplinary and cross-expertise participation. While full benchmark results are not due to be submitted until later this year, interim results have highlighted a number of common issues across multiple software packages, and a web meeting for participants held in July 2019 also led to some improvements in how the benchmark results are being captured. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:38:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-edf1b057ec164c32ac89e3e9a9f1dc4d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1682-1750 2194-9034 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:38:25Z |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-edf1b057ec164c32ac89e3e9a9f1dc4d2022-12-22T00:59:52ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342019-09-01XLII-4-W15475210.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W15-47-2019GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTSF. Noardo0F. Biljecki1G. Agugiaro2K. Arroyo Ohori3C. Ellul4L. Harrie5J. Stoter63D Geoinformation group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsDepartment of Architecture, National University of Singapore, Singapore3D Geoinformation group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands3D Geoinformation group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UKDepartment of Physical Geography, Lund University, Lund, Sweden3D Geoinformation group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsAn investigation into the implementation state of open standards in software is currently ongoing through the ISPRS/EuroSDR ‘GeoBIM benchmark 2019’ initiative, which kicked off earlier this year. The benchmark activity provides a way of assessing and comparing the functionality of different software packages in GIS and BIM in terms of their ability to handle standardised data (IFC and CityGML) and undertake various tasks using this data. Approximately 65 people have registered to participate so far, with participants from a wide range of backgrounds and proposing to test a variety of software packages. This confirms that the issues under investigation are of interest, and also meets the wider benchmark aim of having a variety of participants, since the project is conceived as using a bottom-up approach with cross-disciplinary and cross-expertise participation. While full benchmark results are not due to be submitted until later this year, interim results have highlighted a number of common issues across multiple software packages, and a web meeting for participants held in July 2019 also led to some improvements in how the benchmark results are being captured.https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-4-W15/47/2019/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W15-47-2019.pdf |
| spellingShingle | F. Noardo F. Biljecki G. Agugiaro K. Arroyo Ohori C. Ellul L. Harrie J. Stoter GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| title | GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS |
| title_full | GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS |
| title_fullStr | GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS |
| title_full_unstemmed | GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS |
| title_short | GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS |
| title_sort | geobim benchmark 2019 intermediate results |
| url | https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-4-W15/47/2019/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W15-47-2019.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fnoardo geobimbenchmark2019intermediateresults AT fbiljecki geobimbenchmark2019intermediateresults AT gagugiaro geobimbenchmark2019intermediateresults AT karroyoohori geobimbenchmark2019intermediateresults AT cellul geobimbenchmark2019intermediateresults AT lharrie geobimbenchmark2019intermediateresults AT jstoter geobimbenchmark2019intermediateresults |