Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production

The paper dwells on the results obtained in assessing occupational health risk for workers employed at rubber production; the assessment was based on examining both a priori and a posteriori parameters. It was shown that workers were exposed to a set of factors related to working environment and lab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E.T. Valeeva, L.K. Karimova, R.R. Galimova, N.A. Muldasheva, A.A. Distanova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FBSI “Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies” 2020-03-01
Series:Analiz Riska Zdorovʹû
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fcrisk.ru/eng/2020/1/6
_version_ 1818650739351748608
author E.T. Valeeva
L.K. Karimova
R.R. Galimova
N.A. Muldasheva
A.A. Distanova
author_facet E.T. Valeeva
L.K. Karimova
R.R. Galimova
N.A. Muldasheva
A.A. Distanova
author_sort E.T. Valeeva
collection DOAJ
description The paper dwells on the results obtained in assessing occupational health risk for workers employed at rubber production; the assessment was based on examining both a priori and a posteriori parameters. It was shown that workers were exposed to a set of factors related to working environment and labor process including hazardous chemicals, in-plant noise, adverse microclimate, as well as physical overloads. Chemical factor played the leading role as there were various chemicals in working area air such as benzene in concentrations equal to 1.2–3.0 MPC (maximum single concentration amounted to 4 MPC); di-chloromethane in concentrations equal to 0.2–1.5 MPC average monthly (maximum single ones equal to 2 MPC). Overall work-ing conditions assessment for workers with different occupations employed at rubber production belonged to 3.2 hazard category. Workers who glued parts of articles together ran high risks of occupational diseases; risks were average for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers. Total occupational diseases index amounted to 0.83 for workers who glued articles and to 0.80 for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers and it meant that occupational risk was high. We also revealed that certain diseases were occupationally induced and the dependence was significant; it was true for segmental disorders in the vegetative nervous system with sensitivity failure in hands for gluing workers (RR – 10.3, CI = 95 %, EF – 90 %), musculoskeletal system diseases (RR – 2.5, CI = 95 %, EF – 55 %), and skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers (RR – 2.6, CI = 95 %, EF – 61 %). We ranked occupations as per related occupational health risks and revealed that workers who glued articles had the highest integral occupational risk assessment. Occupational risk assessment gave grounds for developing a risk-oriented program that included priorities and ways to prevent damage to health of workers employed at rubber production such as managerial and medical and prevention activities as well as social support and protection.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:55:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee042c04084e4d03a3da751d8e25bb5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-1155
2308-1163
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:55:00Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher FBSI “Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies”
record_format Article
series Analiz Riska Zdorovʹû
spelling doaj.art-ee042c04084e4d03a3da751d8e25bb5c2022-12-21T22:08:00ZengFBSI “Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies”Analiz Riska Zdorovʹû2308-11552308-11632020-03-011596710.21668/health.risk/2020.1.06.engAssessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber productionE.T. Valeeva0L.K. Karimova1R.R. Galimova2N.A. Muldasheva3A.A. Distanova4Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, 94 Stepana Kuvykina Str., Ufa, 450106, Russian FederationUfa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, 94 Stepana Kuvykina Str., Ufa, 450106, Russian FederationUfa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, 94 Stepana Kuvykina Str., Ufa, 450106, Russian FederationUfa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, 94 Stepana Kuvykina Str., Ufa, 450106, Russian FederationUfa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, 94 Stepana Kuvykina Str., Ufa, 450106, Russian FederationThe paper dwells on the results obtained in assessing occupational health risk for workers employed at rubber production; the assessment was based on examining both a priori and a posteriori parameters. It was shown that workers were exposed to a set of factors related to working environment and labor process including hazardous chemicals, in-plant noise, adverse microclimate, as well as physical overloads. Chemical factor played the leading role as there were various chemicals in working area air such as benzene in concentrations equal to 1.2–3.0 MPC (maximum single concentration amounted to 4 MPC); di-chloromethane in concentrations equal to 0.2–1.5 MPC average monthly (maximum single ones equal to 2 MPC). Overall work-ing conditions assessment for workers with different occupations employed at rubber production belonged to 3.2 hazard category. Workers who glued parts of articles together ran high risks of occupational diseases; risks were average for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers. Total occupational diseases index amounted to 0.83 for workers who glued articles and to 0.80 for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers and it meant that occupational risk was high. We also revealed that certain diseases were occupationally induced and the dependence was significant; it was true for segmental disorders in the vegetative nervous system with sensitivity failure in hands for gluing workers (RR – 10.3, CI = 95 %, EF – 90 %), musculoskeletal system diseases (RR – 2.5, CI = 95 %, EF – 55 %), and skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers (RR – 2.6, CI = 95 %, EF – 61 %). We ranked occupations as per related occupational health risks and revealed that workers who glued articles had the highest integral occupational risk assessment. Occupational risk assessment gave grounds for developing a risk-oriented program that included priorities and ways to prevent damage to health of workers employed at rubber production such as managerial and medical and prevention activities as well as social support and protection.https://journal.fcrisk.ru/eng/2020/1/6occupational riskhealthworkershazardous occupational factorsworking conditionsrubber productionoccupational diseasesoccupationally induced diseases
spellingShingle E.T. Valeeva
L.K. Karimova
R.R. Galimova
N.A. Muldasheva
A.A. Distanova
Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production
Analiz Riska Zdorovʹû
occupational risk
health
workers
hazardous occupational factors
working conditions
rubber production
occupational diseases
occupationally induced diseases
title Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production
title_full Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production
title_fullStr Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production
title_short Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production
title_sort assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production
topic occupational risk
health
workers
hazardous occupational factors
working conditions
rubber production
occupational diseases
occupationally induced diseases
url https://journal.fcrisk.ru/eng/2020/1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT etvaleeva assessmentofoccupationalhealthriskforworkersemployedatcontemporaryrubberproduction
AT lkkarimova assessmentofoccupationalhealthriskforworkersemployedatcontemporaryrubberproduction
AT rrgalimova assessmentofoccupationalhealthriskforworkersemployedatcontemporaryrubberproduction
AT namuldasheva assessmentofoccupationalhealthriskforworkersemployedatcontemporaryrubberproduction
AT aadistanova assessmentofoccupationalhealthriskforworkersemployedatcontemporaryrubberproduction