The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to assess the response prediction and prognostic values of different peripheral blood cell biomarkers for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients receiving first‐line therapy. Methods Patients diagnosed with advanced LUAD as well as healthy controls and patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ran Zuo, Fuyi Zhu, Cuicui Zhang, Jincheng Ma, Jinliang Chen, Ping Yue, Jinfang Cui, Yu Wang, Peng Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14893
_version_ 1797813837559234560
author Ran Zuo
Fuyi Zhu
Cuicui Zhang
Jincheng Ma
Jinliang Chen
Ping Yue
Jinfang Cui
Yu Wang
Peng Chen
author_facet Ran Zuo
Fuyi Zhu
Cuicui Zhang
Jincheng Ma
Jinliang Chen
Ping Yue
Jinfang Cui
Yu Wang
Peng Chen
author_sort Ran Zuo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose This study aimed to assess the response prediction and prognostic values of different peripheral blood cell biomarkers for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients receiving first‐line therapy. Methods Patients diagnosed with advanced LUAD as well as healthy controls and patients with benign pulmonary diseases were collected in this retrospective study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:1 ratio. Survival state was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the prognostic factors. Results Compared with the control groups, the level of peripheral blood leucocyte, neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were higher in LUAD patients (all p < 0.001). Some inflammatory markers decreased at the time of optimal response and then increased again as the disease progressed. Multivariate analysis revealed that SIRI and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were independent prognostic factors no matter before or after PSM analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) of SIRI and LDH were 0.625 (p < 0.001) and 0.596 (p = 0.008), respectively. When SIRI and LDH were combined, the AUC reached 0.649 (p < 0.001). Conclusions Pretreatment SIRI was an independent prognostic factor of progression free survival (PFS) in advanced LUAD patients. Dynamic monitoring of inflammatory index changes could help to predict therapeutic efficacy. The combination of SIRI and LDH is expected to be a promising clinically accessible biomarker in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:58:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee132c2b713140c4a1ef794fa5b3bf4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:58:36Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Thoracic Cancer
spelling doaj.art-ee132c2b713140c4a1ef794fa5b3bf4b2023-06-02T01:27:25ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142023-06-0114161500151110.1111/1759-7714.14893The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomaRan Zuo0Fuyi Zhu1Cuicui Zhang2Jincheng Ma3Jinliang Chen4Ping Yue5Jinfang Cui6Yu Wang7Peng Chen8Department of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Tianjin ChinaAbstract Purpose This study aimed to assess the response prediction and prognostic values of different peripheral blood cell biomarkers for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients receiving first‐line therapy. Methods Patients diagnosed with advanced LUAD as well as healthy controls and patients with benign pulmonary diseases were collected in this retrospective study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:1 ratio. Survival state was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the prognostic factors. Results Compared with the control groups, the level of peripheral blood leucocyte, neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were higher in LUAD patients (all p < 0.001). Some inflammatory markers decreased at the time of optimal response and then increased again as the disease progressed. Multivariate analysis revealed that SIRI and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were independent prognostic factors no matter before or after PSM analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) of SIRI and LDH were 0.625 (p < 0.001) and 0.596 (p = 0.008), respectively. When SIRI and LDH were combined, the AUC reached 0.649 (p < 0.001). Conclusions Pretreatment SIRI was an independent prognostic factor of progression free survival (PFS) in advanced LUAD patients. Dynamic monitoring of inflammatory index changes could help to predict therapeutic efficacy. The combination of SIRI and LDH is expected to be a promising clinically accessible biomarker in the future.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14893advanced lung adenocarcinomabiomarkerspredictiveprognosticsystemic inflammation response index
spellingShingle Ran Zuo
Fuyi Zhu
Cuicui Zhang
Jincheng Ma
Jinliang Chen
Ping Yue
Jinfang Cui
Yu Wang
Peng Chen
The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma
Thoracic Cancer
advanced lung adenocarcinoma
biomarkers
predictive
prognostic
systemic inflammation response index
title The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma
title_full The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma
title_short The response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma
title_sort response prediction and prognostic values of systemic inflammation response index in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma
topic advanced lung adenocarcinoma
biomarkers
predictive
prognostic
systemic inflammation response index
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14893
work_keys_str_mv AT ranzuo theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT fuyizhu theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT cuicuizhang theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT jinchengma theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT jinliangchen theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT pingyue theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT jinfangcui theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT yuwang theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT pengchen theresponsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT ranzuo responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT fuyizhu responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT cuicuizhang responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT jinchengma responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT jinliangchen responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT pingyue responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT jinfangcui responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT yuwang responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma
AT pengchen responsepredictionandprognosticvaluesofsystemicinflammationresponseindexinpatientswithadvancedlungadenocarcinoma