The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”

<p>This response to Shelley Fisher Fishkin's “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">D</span>igital <span style="text-decoration: underline;">P</span>alimpsest <span styl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karen Elizabeth Bishop
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2011-12-01
Series:Journal of Transnational American Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://submit.escholarship.org/ojs/index.php/acgcc_jtas/article/view/11635
_version_ 1818133107457392640
author Karen Elizabeth Bishop
author_facet Karen Elizabeth Bishop
author_sort Karen Elizabeth Bishop
collection DOAJ
description <p>This response to Shelley Fisher Fishkin's “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">D</span>igital <span style="text-decoration: underline;">P</span>alimpsest <span style="text-decoration: underline;">M</span>apping <span style="text-decoration: underline;">P</span>rojects” explicates the layers of complex interconnected practices that Fishkin’s paradigm of Deep Maps instates. Bishop notes that Fishkin’s trope of palimpsests “depends on a scholarly methodology that privileges the transnational as a structure, a means, and a dynamic site of excavation for intellectual inquiry” and “provides for new forms of collaborative writing and new reading practices” in which scholars, students, and even members of the general public can build geo-archives together. Fishkin’s Deep Maps project, Bishop concludes, foregrounds a construction of place in a “self-reflective placial exercise” that accepts “other national literatures and histories [with] . . . their own ways of understanding and engaging with the transnational.”</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T08:47:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee1d2b1e4bf2441c829999ba6ea6c681
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1940-0764
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T08:47:28Z
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Journal of Transnational American Studies
spelling doaj.art-ee1d2b1e4bf2441c829999ba6ea6c6812022-12-22T01:14:06ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaJournal of Transnational American Studies1940-07642011-12-0132The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”Karen Elizabeth Bishop<p>This response to Shelley Fisher Fishkin's “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">D</span>igital <span style="text-decoration: underline;">P</span>alimpsest <span style="text-decoration: underline;">M</span>apping <span style="text-decoration: underline;">P</span>rojects” explicates the layers of complex interconnected practices that Fishkin’s paradigm of Deep Maps instates. Bishop notes that Fishkin’s trope of palimpsests “depends on a scholarly methodology that privileges the transnational as a structure, a means, and a dynamic site of excavation for intellectual inquiry” and “provides for new forms of collaborative writing and new reading practices” in which scholars, students, and even members of the general public can build geo-archives together. Fishkin’s Deep Maps project, Bishop concludes, foregrounds a construction of place in a “self-reflective placial exercise” that accepts “other national literatures and histories [with] . . . their own ways of understanding and engaging with the transnational.”</p>https://submit.escholarship.org/ojs/index.php/acgcc_jtas/article/view/11635Transnational American StudiesDeep MapsPalimpsest
spellingShingle Karen Elizabeth Bishop
The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”
Journal of Transnational American Studies
Transnational American Studies
Deep Maps
Palimpsest
title The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”
title_full The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”
title_fullStr The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”
title_full_unstemmed The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”
title_short The Propositional Logic of Mapping Transnational American Studies—A Response to “‘Deep Maps’: A Brief for <u>D</u>igital <u>P</u>alimpsest <u>M</u>apping <u>P</u>rojects”
title_sort propositional logic of mapping transnational american studies a response to deep maps a brief for lt u gt d lt u gt igital lt u gt p lt u gt alimpsest lt u gt m lt u gt apping lt u gt p lt u gt rojects
topic Transnational American Studies
Deep Maps
Palimpsest
url https://submit.escholarship.org/ojs/index.php/acgcc_jtas/article/view/11635
work_keys_str_mv AT karenelizabethbishop thepropositionallogicofmappingtransnationalamericanstudiesaresponsetodeepmapsabriefforltugtdltugtigitalltugtpltugtalimpsestltugtmltugtappingltugtpltugtrojects
AT karenelizabethbishop propositionallogicofmappingtransnationalamericanstudiesaresponsetodeepmapsabriefforltugtdltugtigitalltugtpltugtalimpsestltugtmltugtappingltugtpltugtrojects