Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection Patients

Aim: Stanford Type B acute aortic dissection (Type B-AAD) has a higher mortality among the cardiovascular diseases and the complexity of its treatment is an important challenge. The duration of dissection, whether it is complicated or uncomplicated play a determinant role in the treatment of the dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deniz Demir, Nail Kahraman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mustafa Kemal University 2019-03-01
Series:Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/mkutfd/issue/44115/499838?publisher=mku
_version_ 1797915408298147840
author Deniz Demir
Nail Kahraman
author_facet Deniz Demir
Nail Kahraman
author_sort Deniz Demir
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Stanford Type B acute aortic dissection (Type B-AAD) has a higher mortality among the cardiovascular diseases and the complexity of its treatment is an important challenge. The duration of dissection, whether it is complicated or uncomplicated play a determinant role in the treatment of the disease. In this study, we evaluated the results of the patients that we followed and we treated due to the Type B acute aortic dissection.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a single center and retrospectively. The treatment strategy of the patients was determined with respect to be acute or chronic and to be complicated or uncomplicated. The patients were treated via medical treatment, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or open surgery and then they were followed. The mortality and the morbidity causes of the patients were recorded.Result:Totally, 23 patients were treated due to Type B acute aortic dissection. The mean age of the patients was 58.21±14.17. The majority of the followed patients (16 patients (69.5%)) were followed with medical treatment. The patients who were followed with TEVAR treatment were in the second rank. The number of the TEVAR patients was 5 (21.7%). Two patients were treated with open surgery. 30-day survival was observed in 20 (86.9%) patients. The total mortality was seen in 3 (13%) patients.Conclusion: The twenty five percent of the patients who refer due to Type B acute aortic dissection admit due to malperfusion syndrome or hemodynamic instability. Organ malperfusion and hemodynamic instability are the most important causes of deaths of these patients. Hence, the early diagnosis of the patient and its optimal treatment is life-saving. If the patients who are treated due to the Type B acute aortic dissection are in uncomplicated type, medical treatment is in the forefront. In complicated patients, TEVAR or open surgery are recommended. In our Type B acute aortic dissection group which consists of 23 patients, the total mortality ratio was seen in 3 (13%) patients. The ratios for renal failure and for plegia were found as 4.3%. In thoracic endovascular aortic repair, no mortality was found.In conclusion, we primarily recommend conventional medical treatment for the patients in uncomplicated type in the treatment of the Type B acute aortic dissection patients. In the patients in complicated type we recommend TEVAR treatment. Since the necessary equipment for the TEVAR could not be ensured, we recommend open surgery for the emergency cases.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T12:41:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee208c3abb3b480099bc2ecb9052fd20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2149-3103
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T12:41:12Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Mustafa Kemal University
record_format Article
series Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-ee208c3abb3b480099bc2ecb9052fd202023-02-15T16:14:17ZengMustafa Kemal UniversityMustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi2149-31032019-03-0110361510.17944/mkutfd.499838102Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection PatientsDeniz Demir0Nail Kahraman1BURSA YÜKSEK İHTİSAS EĞİTİM VE ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİ, KALP VE DAMAR CERRAHİSİBURSA YÜKSEK İHTİSAS EĞİTİM VE ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİ, KALP VE DAMAR CERRAHİSİAim: Stanford Type B acute aortic dissection (Type B-AAD) has a higher mortality among the cardiovascular diseases and the complexity of its treatment is an important challenge. The duration of dissection, whether it is complicated or uncomplicated play a determinant role in the treatment of the disease. In this study, we evaluated the results of the patients that we followed and we treated due to the Type B acute aortic dissection.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a single center and retrospectively. The treatment strategy of the patients was determined with respect to be acute or chronic and to be complicated or uncomplicated. The patients were treated via medical treatment, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or open surgery and then they were followed. The mortality and the morbidity causes of the patients were recorded.Result:Totally, 23 patients were treated due to Type B acute aortic dissection. The mean age of the patients was 58.21±14.17. The majority of the followed patients (16 patients (69.5%)) were followed with medical treatment. The patients who were followed with TEVAR treatment were in the second rank. The number of the TEVAR patients was 5 (21.7%). Two patients were treated with open surgery. 30-day survival was observed in 20 (86.9%) patients. The total mortality was seen in 3 (13%) patients.Conclusion: The twenty five percent of the patients who refer due to Type B acute aortic dissection admit due to malperfusion syndrome or hemodynamic instability. Organ malperfusion and hemodynamic instability are the most important causes of deaths of these patients. Hence, the early diagnosis of the patient and its optimal treatment is life-saving. If the patients who are treated due to the Type B acute aortic dissection are in uncomplicated type, medical treatment is in the forefront. In complicated patients, TEVAR or open surgery are recommended. In our Type B acute aortic dissection group which consists of 23 patients, the total mortality ratio was seen in 3 (13%) patients. The ratios for renal failure and for plegia were found as 4.3%. In thoracic endovascular aortic repair, no mortality was found.In conclusion, we primarily recommend conventional medical treatment for the patients in uncomplicated type in the treatment of the Type B acute aortic dissection patients. In the patients in complicated type we recommend TEVAR treatment. Since the necessary equipment for the TEVAR could not be ensured, we recommend open surgery for the emergency cases.http://dergipark.gov.tr/mkutfd/issue/44115/499838?publisher=mkuTip B akut aort diseksiyonutorasik endovasküler aort onarımıcerrahiType B acute aortic dissectionthoracic endovascular aortic repairsurgery
spellingShingle Deniz Demir
Nail Kahraman
Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection Patients
Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi
Tip B akut aort diseksiyonu
torasik endovasküler aort onarımı
cerrahi
Type B acute aortic dissection
thoracic endovascular aortic repair
surgery
title Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection Patients
title_full Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection Patients
title_fullStr Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection Patients
title_full_unstemmed Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection Patients
title_short Short-term and Midterm Treatment Results in Stanford Type-B Acute Dissection Patients
title_sort short term and midterm treatment results in stanford type b acute dissection patients
topic Tip B akut aort diseksiyonu
torasik endovasküler aort onarımı
cerrahi
Type B acute aortic dissection
thoracic endovascular aortic repair
surgery
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/mkutfd/issue/44115/499838?publisher=mku
work_keys_str_mv AT denizdemir shorttermandmidtermtreatmentresultsinstanfordtypebacutedissectionpatients
AT nailkahraman shorttermandmidtermtreatmentresultsinstanfordtypebacutedissectionpatients