Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernables

The aim of this article is to resume discussions around the principle of identity of indiscernibles (PIdI) by specifying the type of entities that could derogate from it. I defend the idea that the rejection of PIdI comes from the possibility of three types of doubles : pure replicas, or perfect rep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolas Erdrich
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Éditions Kimé 2020-05-01
Series:Philosophia Scientiæ
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/2241
_version_ 1797402645786263552
author Nicolas Erdrich
author_facet Nicolas Erdrich
author_sort Nicolas Erdrich
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this article is to resume discussions around the principle of identity of indiscernibles (PIdI) by specifying the type of entities that could derogate from it. I defend the idea that the rejection of PIdI comes from the possibility of three types of doubles : pure replicas, or perfect reproductions, pure doubles, doubles which can not even be distinguished by spatio-temporal relations, and finally pure coincidents. The thesis that I defend is to show that the existence of such entities is not only conceivable, but even, for the first two kinds, physically possible. With regard to the possibility of pure coincidents, the rejection of such entities may be supported by a principle of ontological parsimony based on causal indifference, independently of PIdI.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:27:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee22f8186d4047ce9b1f21235eb09d64
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1281-2463
1775-4283
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:27:13Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Éditions Kimé
record_format Article
series Philosophia Scientiæ
spelling doaj.art-ee22f8186d4047ce9b1f21235eb09d642023-12-06T15:53:23ZdeuÉditions KiméPhilosophia Scientiæ1281-24631775-42832020-05-01242295210.4000/philosophiascientiae.2241Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernablesNicolas ErdrichThe aim of this article is to resume discussions around the principle of identity of indiscernibles (PIdI) by specifying the type of entities that could derogate from it. I defend the idea that the rejection of PIdI comes from the possibility of three types of doubles : pure replicas, or perfect reproductions, pure doubles, doubles which can not even be distinguished by spatio-temporal relations, and finally pure coincidents. The thesis that I defend is to show that the existence of such entities is not only conceivable, but even, for the first two kinds, physically possible. With regard to the possibility of pure coincidents, the rejection of such entities may be supported by a principle of ontological parsimony based on causal indifference, independently of PIdI.http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/2241
spellingShingle Nicolas Erdrich
Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernables
Philosophia Scientiæ
title Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernables
title_full Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernables
title_fullStr Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernables
title_full_unstemmed Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernables
title_short Répliques, doubles et coïncidents purs. Trois régimes d’indiscernables
title_sort repliques doubles et coincidents purs trois regimes d indiscernables
url http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/2241
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolaserdrich repliquesdoublesetcoincidentspurstroisregimesdindiscernables