IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICS

After the 2014 European Parliament elections the voices of Eurosceptic forces have become increasingly louder, with their activity beginning to have direct infl uence on the EU politics, which can be proved by the results of the 23rd June UK’s EU referendum. Consequently, the interpretation of the t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. O. Shibkova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jurist, Publishing Group 2016-11-01
Series:Сравнительная политика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://comparativepolitics.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/542
_version_ 1797422402025553920
author M. O. Shibkova
author_facet M. O. Shibkova
author_sort M. O. Shibkova
collection DOAJ
description After the 2014 European Parliament elections the voices of Eurosceptic forces have become increasingly louder, with their activity beginning to have direct infl uence on the EU politics, which can be proved by the results of the 23rd June UK’s EU referendum. Consequently, the interpretation of the term “Euroscepticism” and its typology is of a particular interest in the academic world. This article compares such varieties of Euroscepticism as “ideological” and “strategic”. Basing on the defi nitions, given by N. Sitter, P. Kopecky and C. Mudde, the author analyses the policies of the United Kingdom Independence Party and the Italian “Five Star Movement”. While both parties, calling for the withdrawal from the EU and the Eurozone respectively, and being members of the same European Parliament political group (Europe for Freedom and Direct Democracy) are considered anti-EU forces, Euroscepticism is not playing the same role in their policies. This can be explained by different historic attitude of the British and the Italians towards the European integration as well as different problems which the countries have to face being the EU members. Through examining the process of the parties’ institutionalization, their structure, and analyzing their initial aims, election programs, party leaders’ speeches and voting tactics in the European Parliament the author consistently proves that while in case of UKIP Euroscepticism is ideological and completely defi nes the party policy, in case of M5S it is purely strategic and aimed at attracting the electorate.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:31:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee26a500fabf472eac0399066a7d978a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2221-3279
2412-4990
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:31:47Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Jurist, Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Сравнительная политика
spelling doaj.art-ee26a500fabf472eac0399066a7d978a2023-12-03T06:22:56ZengJurist, Publishing GroupСравнительная политика2221-32792412-49902016-11-0174(25)132410.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-4(25)-13-24403IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICSM. O. Shibkova0МГИМО МИД России, г. Москва, РоссияAfter the 2014 European Parliament elections the voices of Eurosceptic forces have become increasingly louder, with their activity beginning to have direct infl uence on the EU politics, which can be proved by the results of the 23rd June UK’s EU referendum. Consequently, the interpretation of the term “Euroscepticism” and its typology is of a particular interest in the academic world. This article compares such varieties of Euroscepticism as “ideological” and “strategic”. Basing on the defi nitions, given by N. Sitter, P. Kopecky and C. Mudde, the author analyses the policies of the United Kingdom Independence Party and the Italian “Five Star Movement”. While both parties, calling for the withdrawal from the EU and the Eurozone respectively, and being members of the same European Parliament political group (Europe for Freedom and Direct Democracy) are considered anti-EU forces, Euroscepticism is not playing the same role in their policies. This can be explained by different historic attitude of the British and the Italians towards the European integration as well as different problems which the countries have to face being the EU members. Through examining the process of the parties’ institutionalization, their structure, and analyzing their initial aims, election programs, party leaders’ speeches and voting tactics in the European Parliament the author consistently proves that while in case of UKIP Euroscepticism is ideological and completely defi nes the party policy, in case of M5S it is purely strategic and aimed at attracting the electorate.https://comparativepolitics.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/542евроскептицизмидеологический евроскептицизмстратегический евроскептицизмевропейский союзпартия независимости соединенного королевствадвижение пяти звездполитические партии есевропейская интеграцияреферендум в великобритании.
spellingShingle M. O. Shibkova
IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICS
Сравнительная политика
евроскептицизм
идеологический евроскептицизм
стратегический евроскептицизм
европейский союз
партия независимости соединенного королевства
движение пяти звезд
политические партии ес
европейская интеграция
референдум в великобритании.
title IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICS
title_full IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICS
title_fullStr IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICS
title_full_unstemmed IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICS
title_short IDEOLOGICAL AND STRATEGIC EUROSCEPTICISM IN EU POLITICS
title_sort ideological and strategic euroscepticism in eu politics
topic евроскептицизм
идеологический евроскептицизм
стратегический евроскептицизм
европейский союз
партия независимости соединенного королевства
движение пяти звезд
политические партии ес
европейская интеграция
референдум в великобритании.
url https://comparativepolitics.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/542
work_keys_str_mv AT moshibkova ideologicalandstrategiceuroscepticismineupolitics