CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY

This study investigates whether indirect corrective feedback is effective on students’ writing accuracy and whether there is any interaction between corrective feedback and students’ levels of grammatical sensitivity. A quasi-factorial design was adopted for this research. The subjects of the study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayu Rizki Septiana, Gunadi Harry Sulistyo, A. Effendi Kadarisman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 2016-07-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/2642
_version_ 1818942749441785856
author Ayu Rizki Septiana
Gunadi Harry Sulistyo
A. Effendi Kadarisman
author_facet Ayu Rizki Septiana
Gunadi Harry Sulistyo
A. Effendi Kadarisman
author_sort Ayu Rizki Septiana
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates whether indirect corrective feedback is effective on students’ writing accuracy and whether there is any interaction between corrective feedback and students’ levels of grammatical sensitivity. A quasi-factorial design was adopted for this research. The subjects of the study were fourth-semester students of English Department, at a State University in Malang, selected randomly. The experimental group was treated with indirect corrective feedback and the control group with direct corrective feedback. A parametric statistical test, ANCOVA, was used to test the hypotheses. The findings show that there was no statistical difference on writing accuracy between the experimental and control groups. Yet, among students with a high level of grammatical sensitivity, there was significant difference in writing accuracy between those given indirect and direct corrective feedback. Further, there was no interaction between corrective feedback on writing accuracy and students’ levels of grammatical sensitivity. However, indirect corrective feedback improved students’ writing accuracy better than direct corrective feedback.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:16:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee413a6cdd404b89a704bc7c69639499
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2301-9468
2502-6747
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:16:23Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
record_format Article
series Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-ee413a6cdd404b89a704bc7c696394992022-12-21T19:48:47ZengUniversitas Pendidikan IndonesiaIndonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics2301-94682502-67472016-07-016111110.17509/ijal.v6i1.26422030CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITYAyu Rizki Septiana0Gunadi Harry Sulistyo1A. Effendi Kadarisman2Graduate Program in English Language Teaching State University of MalangGraduate Program in English Language Teaching State University of MalangGraduate Program in English Language Teaching State University of MalangThis study investigates whether indirect corrective feedback is effective on students’ writing accuracy and whether there is any interaction between corrective feedback and students’ levels of grammatical sensitivity. A quasi-factorial design was adopted for this research. The subjects of the study were fourth-semester students of English Department, at a State University in Malang, selected randomly. The experimental group was treated with indirect corrective feedback and the control group with direct corrective feedback. A parametric statistical test, ANCOVA, was used to test the hypotheses. The findings show that there was no statistical difference on writing accuracy between the experimental and control groups. Yet, among students with a high level of grammatical sensitivity, there was significant difference in writing accuracy between those given indirect and direct corrective feedback. Further, there was no interaction between corrective feedback on writing accuracy and students’ levels of grammatical sensitivity. However, indirect corrective feedback improved students’ writing accuracy better than direct corrective feedback.http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/2642indirect corrective feedback, direct corrective feedback, grammatical sensitivity, writing accuracy
spellingShingle Ayu Rizki Septiana
Gunadi Harry Sulistyo
A. Effendi Kadarisman
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
indirect corrective feedback, direct corrective feedback, grammatical sensitivity, writing accuracy
title CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
title_full CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
title_fullStr CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
title_full_unstemmed CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
title_short CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
title_sort corrective feedback and writing accuracy of students across different levels of grammatical sensitivity
topic indirect corrective feedback, direct corrective feedback, grammatical sensitivity, writing accuracy
url http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/2642
work_keys_str_mv AT ayurizkiseptiana correctivefeedbackandwritingaccuracyofstudentsacrossdifferentlevelsofgrammaticalsensitivity
AT gunadiharrysulistyo correctivefeedbackandwritingaccuracyofstudentsacrossdifferentlevelsofgrammaticalsensitivity
AT aeffendikadarisman correctivefeedbackandwritingaccuracyofstudentsacrossdifferentlevelsofgrammaticalsensitivity