Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc Analysis

Approximately 12–13% of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are diagnosed with unclassifiable ILD (uILD), often despite thorough evaluation. A recent Phase 2 study (NCT03099187) described a significant effect of pirfenidone vs. placebo on forced vital capacity (FVC) measured by site spirom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Molina-Molina, Michael Kreuter, Vincent Cottin, Tamera J. Corte, Frank Gilberg, Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler, Judit Axmann, Toby M. Maher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.897102/full
_version_ 1811337679772581888
author Maria Molina-Molina
Maria Molina-Molina
Michael Kreuter
Michael Kreuter
Vincent Cottin
Vincent Cottin
Tamera J. Corte
Tamera J. Corte
Frank Gilberg
Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler
Judit Axmann
Toby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher
author_facet Maria Molina-Molina
Maria Molina-Molina
Michael Kreuter
Michael Kreuter
Vincent Cottin
Vincent Cottin
Tamera J. Corte
Tamera J. Corte
Frank Gilberg
Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler
Judit Axmann
Toby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher
author_sort Maria Molina-Molina
collection DOAJ
description Approximately 12–13% of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are diagnosed with unclassifiable ILD (uILD), often despite thorough evaluation. A recent Phase 2 study (NCT03099187) described a significant effect of pirfenidone vs. placebo on forced vital capacity (FVC) measured by site spirometry in patients with progressive fibrosing uILD (hereafter referred to as the pirfenidone in uILD study). Here, we present the results from a post-hoc analysis of this study to assess patient baseline characteristics and the efficacy of pirfenidone vs. placebo analyzed by surgical lung biopsy (SLB) status. Mean FVC (mL) change over 24 weeks was included as a post-hoc efficacy outcome. Of 253 randomized patients, 88 (34.8%) had a SLB and 165 (65.2%) did not. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between SLB subgroups; however, patients who had a SLB were slightly younger and had a higher 6-min walk distance than those without a SLB. Mean FVC change over 24 weeks for pirfenidone vs. placebo was −90.9 vs. −146.3 mL, respectively, in patients who had a SLB, and 8.2 vs. −85.3 mL, respectively, in patients without a SLB. Overall, the results from the post-hoc analysis identified that pirfenidone may be an effective treatment in progressive fibrosing uILD over 24 weeks, irrespective of SLB status; however, caution should be taken when interpreting these data due to several limitations. There are differences in the treatment effect of pirfenidone between the subgroups that require further pathological and radiological investigation. In this manuscript, we also descriptively compared baseline characteristics from the overall pirfenidone in uILD study population with other uILD populations reported in the literature, with the aim of understanding if there are any similarities or differences within these cohorts. Most baseline characteristics for patients in the pirfenidone in uILD study were within the ranges reported in the literature; however, ranges were wide, highlighting the heterogeneity of uILD populations.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03099187.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:58:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee6f556226ca452ba20b217abf867f7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-858X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:58:27Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ee6f556226ca452ba20b217abf867f7c2022-12-22T02:36:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2022-06-01910.3389/fmed.2022.897102897102Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc AnalysisMaria Molina-Molina0Maria Molina-Molina1Michael Kreuter2Michael Kreuter3Vincent Cottin4Vincent Cottin5Tamera J. Corte6Tamera J. Corte7Frank Gilberg8Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler9Judit Axmann10Toby M. Maher11Toby M. Maher12Toby M. Maher13ILD Unit, Respiratory Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, SpainCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, SpainCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Dep-Pneumonology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyGerman Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Reference Coordinating Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Member of ERN-LUNG, Lyon, FranceIVPC, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UMR754, INRAE, Lyon, FranceDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaMedical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, AustraliaF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, SwitzerlandF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, SwitzerlandF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland0Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom2Hastings Center for Pulmonary Research and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesApproximately 12–13% of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are diagnosed with unclassifiable ILD (uILD), often despite thorough evaluation. A recent Phase 2 study (NCT03099187) described a significant effect of pirfenidone vs. placebo on forced vital capacity (FVC) measured by site spirometry in patients with progressive fibrosing uILD (hereafter referred to as the pirfenidone in uILD study). Here, we present the results from a post-hoc analysis of this study to assess patient baseline characteristics and the efficacy of pirfenidone vs. placebo analyzed by surgical lung biopsy (SLB) status. Mean FVC (mL) change over 24 weeks was included as a post-hoc efficacy outcome. Of 253 randomized patients, 88 (34.8%) had a SLB and 165 (65.2%) did not. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between SLB subgroups; however, patients who had a SLB were slightly younger and had a higher 6-min walk distance than those without a SLB. Mean FVC change over 24 weeks for pirfenidone vs. placebo was −90.9 vs. −146.3 mL, respectively, in patients who had a SLB, and 8.2 vs. −85.3 mL, respectively, in patients without a SLB. Overall, the results from the post-hoc analysis identified that pirfenidone may be an effective treatment in progressive fibrosing uILD over 24 weeks, irrespective of SLB status; however, caution should be taken when interpreting these data due to several limitations. There are differences in the treatment effect of pirfenidone between the subgroups that require further pathological and radiological investigation. In this manuscript, we also descriptively compared baseline characteristics from the overall pirfenidone in uILD study population with other uILD populations reported in the literature, with the aim of understanding if there are any similarities or differences within these cohorts. Most baseline characteristics for patients in the pirfenidone in uILD study were within the ranges reported in the literature; however, ranges were wide, highlighting the heterogeneity of uILD populations.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03099187.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.897102/fulllung functionpirfenidonepost-hoc analysissurgical lung biopsyunclassifiable interstitial lung disease
spellingShingle Maria Molina-Molina
Maria Molina-Molina
Michael Kreuter
Michael Kreuter
Vincent Cottin
Vincent Cottin
Tamera J. Corte
Tamera J. Corte
Frank Gilberg
Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler
Judit Axmann
Toby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher
Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc Analysis
Frontiers in Medicine
lung function
pirfenidone
post-hoc analysis
surgical lung biopsy
unclassifiable interstitial lung disease
title Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc Analysis
title_full Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc Analysis
title_short Efficacy of Pirfenidone vs. Placebo in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease, by Surgical Lung Biopsy Status: Data From a post-hoc Analysis
title_sort efficacy of pirfenidone vs placebo in unclassifiable interstitial lung disease by surgical lung biopsy status data from a post hoc analysis
topic lung function
pirfenidone
post-hoc analysis
surgical lung biopsy
unclassifiable interstitial lung disease
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.897102/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariamolinamolina efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT mariamolinamolina efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT michaelkreuter efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT michaelkreuter efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT vincentcottin efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT vincentcottin efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT tamerajcorte efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT tamerajcorte efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT frankgilberg efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT klausuwekirchgaessler efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT juditaxmann efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT tobymmaher efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT tobymmaher efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis
AT tobymmaher efficacyofpirfenidonevsplaceboinunclassifiableinterstitiallungdiseasebysurgicallungbiopsystatusdatafromaposthocanalysis