Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation

Public history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heather Hughes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2023-03-01
Series:Public History Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/phrj/article/view/8374
_version_ 1797814310810943488
author Heather Hughes
author_facet Heather Hughes
author_sort Heather Hughes
collection DOAJ
description Public history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means of achieving this goal: the first has been to commission a large number of new memory sites and the second has been to insist on a renovation of older sites, whose previous incarnation served the narrow interests of a small white minority. While clear new narratives have emerged, the process has witnessed continuing contests over representation and competing claims to the heritage estate.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T08:05:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ee7f11ce3f6349fe9dea0bb4c3cfd585
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1833-4989
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T08:05:46Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher UTS ePRESS
record_format Article
series Public History Review
spelling doaj.art-ee7f11ce3f6349fe9dea0bb4c3cfd5852023-06-01T05:33:12ZengUTS ePRESSPublic History Review1833-49892023-03-013010.5130/phrj.v30i0.8374Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and ReconciliationHeather Hughes0Lincoln University Public history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means of achieving this goal: the first has been to commission a large number of new memory sites and the second has been to insist on a renovation of older sites, whose previous incarnation served the narrow interests of a small white minority. While clear new narratives have emerged, the process has witnessed continuing contests over representation and competing claims to the heritage estate. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/phrj/article/view/8374legacy project, post-apartheid memorial complex, struggle narrative, rehumanising heritage
spellingShingle Heather Hughes
Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation
Public History Review
legacy project, post-apartheid memorial complex, struggle narrative, rehumanising heritage
title Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation
title_full Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation
title_fullStr Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation
title_full_unstemmed Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation
title_short Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation
title_sort public histories in south africa between contest and reconciliation
topic legacy project, post-apartheid memorial complex, struggle narrative, rehumanising heritage
url https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/phrj/article/view/8374
work_keys_str_mv AT heatherhughes publichistoriesinsouthafricabetweencontestandreconciliation