Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation
Public history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UTS ePRESS
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Public History Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/phrj/article/view/8374 |
_version_ | 1797814310810943488 |
---|---|
author | Heather Hughes |
author_facet | Heather Hughes |
author_sort | Heather Hughes |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Public history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means of achieving this goal: the first has been to commission a large number of new memory sites and the second has been to insist on a renovation of older sites, whose previous incarnation served the narrow interests of a small white minority. While clear new narratives have emerged, the process has witnessed continuing contests over representation and competing claims to the heritage estate.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:05:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ee7f11ce3f6349fe9dea0bb4c3cfd585 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1833-4989 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:05:46Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | UTS ePRESS |
record_format | Article |
series | Public History Review |
spelling | doaj.art-ee7f11ce3f6349fe9dea0bb4c3cfd5852023-06-01T05:33:12ZengUTS ePRESSPublic History Review1833-49892023-03-013010.5130/phrj.v30i0.8374Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and ReconciliationHeather Hughes0Lincoln University Public history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means of achieving this goal: the first has been to commission a large number of new memory sites and the second has been to insist on a renovation of older sites, whose previous incarnation served the narrow interests of a small white minority. While clear new narratives have emerged, the process has witnessed continuing contests over representation and competing claims to the heritage estate. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/phrj/article/view/8374legacy project, post-apartheid memorial complex, struggle narrative, rehumanising heritage |
spellingShingle | Heather Hughes Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation Public History Review legacy project, post-apartheid memorial complex, struggle narrative, rehumanising heritage |
title | Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation |
title_full | Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation |
title_fullStr | Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation |
title_full_unstemmed | Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation |
title_short | Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation |
title_sort | public histories in south africa between contest and reconciliation |
topic | legacy project, post-apartheid memorial complex, struggle narrative, rehumanising heritage |
url | https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/phrj/article/view/8374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heatherhughes publichistoriesinsouthafricabetweencontestandreconciliation |