Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage Emergence

Ming-Jr Jian,1,* Hsing-Yi Chung,1,* Chih-Kai Chang,1 Jung-Chung Lin,2 Kuo-Ming Yeh,2 Chien-Wen Chen,3 Shih-Yi Li,1 Shan-Shan Hsieh,1 Ming-Tsan Liu,4 Ji-Rong Yang,4 Sheng-Hui Tang,1 Cherng-Lih Perng,1 Feng-Yee Chang,2 Hung-Sheng Shang1 1Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian MJ, Chung HY, Chang CK, Lin JC, Yeh KM, Chen CW, Li SY, Hsieh SS, Liu MT, Yang JR, Tang SH, Perng CL, Chang FY, Shang HS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-08-01
Series:Infection and Drug Resistance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/clinical-comparison-of-three-sample-to-answer-systems-for-detecting-sa-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IDR
_version_ 1818597611684233216
author Jian MJ
Chung HY
Chang CK
Lin JC
Yeh KM
Chen CW
Li SY
Hsieh SS
Liu MT
Yang JR
Tang SH
Perng CL
Chang FY
Shang HS
author_facet Jian MJ
Chung HY
Chang CK
Lin JC
Yeh KM
Chen CW
Li SY
Hsieh SS
Liu MT
Yang JR
Tang SH
Perng CL
Chang FY
Shang HS
author_sort Jian MJ
collection DOAJ
description Ming-Jr Jian,1,* Hsing-Yi Chung,1,* Chih-Kai Chang,1 Jung-Chung Lin,2 Kuo-Ming Yeh,2 Chien-Wen Chen,3 Shih-Yi Li,1 Shan-Shan Hsieh,1 Ming-Tsan Liu,4 Ji-Rong Yang,4 Sheng-Hui Tang,1 Cherng-Lih Perng,1 Feng-Yee Chang,2 Hung-Sheng Shang1 1Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; 2Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; 3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; 4Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Hung-Sheng Shang; Feng-Yee Chang Email iamkeith001@gmail.com; fychang@mail.ndmctsgh.edu.twPurpose: Accurate molecular diagnostic assays for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, are needed for epidemiology studies and to support infection-control measures. We evaluated the analytical sensitivity and clinical performance of three sample-to-answer molecular-diagnostics systems for detecting SARS-CoV-2 using 325 nasopharyngeal swab clinical samples from symptomatic patients.Methods: The BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1), cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV platforms, which have been granted emergency-use authorization by the US FDA, were tested and compared.Results: The positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and overall percent agreement among the three point of care testing systems were 98– 100%, including for the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (non-B.1.1.7) and a variant of concern (B.1.1.7). Notably, the BioFire RP2.1 may fail to detect the SARS-CoV-2 S gene in the B.1.1.7 lineage because of the spike protein mutation.Conclusion: All three point of care testing platforms provided highly sensitive, robust, and almost accurate results for rapidly detecting SARS-CoV-2. These automated molecular diagnostic assays can increase the effectiveness of control and prevention measures for infectious diseases.Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, point of care testing, molecular diagnostics, sample to answer, variant of concern
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:50:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eeb3527d11114348924fb57a11e929da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6973
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:50:34Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Infection and Drug Resistance
spelling doaj.art-eeb3527d11114348924fb57a11e929da2022-12-21T22:32:44ZengDove Medical PressInfection and Drug Resistance1178-69732021-08-01Volume 143255326167985Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage EmergenceJian MJChung HYChang CKLin JCYeh KMChen CWLi SYHsieh SSLiu MTYang JRTang SHPerng CLChang FYShang HSMing-Jr Jian,1,* Hsing-Yi Chung,1,* Chih-Kai Chang,1 Jung-Chung Lin,2 Kuo-Ming Yeh,2 Chien-Wen Chen,3 Shih-Yi Li,1 Shan-Shan Hsieh,1 Ming-Tsan Liu,4 Ji-Rong Yang,4 Sheng-Hui Tang,1 Cherng-Lih Perng,1 Feng-Yee Chang,2 Hung-Sheng Shang1 1Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; 2Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; 3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; 4Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Hung-Sheng Shang; Feng-Yee Chang Email iamkeith001@gmail.com; fychang@mail.ndmctsgh.edu.twPurpose: Accurate molecular diagnostic assays for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, are needed for epidemiology studies and to support infection-control measures. We evaluated the analytical sensitivity and clinical performance of three sample-to-answer molecular-diagnostics systems for detecting SARS-CoV-2 using 325 nasopharyngeal swab clinical samples from symptomatic patients.Methods: The BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1), cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV platforms, which have been granted emergency-use authorization by the US FDA, were tested and compared.Results: The positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and overall percent agreement among the three point of care testing systems were 98– 100%, including for the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (non-B.1.1.7) and a variant of concern (B.1.1.7). Notably, the BioFire RP2.1 may fail to detect the SARS-CoV-2 S gene in the B.1.1.7 lineage because of the spike protein mutation.Conclusion: All three point of care testing platforms provided highly sensitive, robust, and almost accurate results for rapidly detecting SARS-CoV-2. These automated molecular diagnostic assays can increase the effectiveness of control and prevention measures for infectious diseases.Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, point of care testing, molecular diagnostics, sample to answer, variant of concernhttps://www.dovepress.com/clinical-comparison-of-three-sample-to-answer-systems-for-detecting-sa-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IDRcovid-19sars-cov-2point of care testingmolecular diagnosticssample to answervariant of concern
spellingShingle Jian MJ
Chung HY
Chang CK
Lin JC
Yeh KM
Chen CW
Li SY
Hsieh SS
Liu MT
Yang JR
Tang SH
Perng CL
Chang FY
Shang HS
Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage Emergence
Infection and Drug Resistance
covid-19
sars-cov-2
point of care testing
molecular diagnostics
sample to answer
variant of concern
title Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage Emergence
title_full Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage Emergence
title_fullStr Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage Emergence
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage Emergence
title_short Clinical Comparison of Three Sample-to-Answer Systems for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in B.1.1.7 Lineage Emergence
title_sort clinical comparison of three sample to answer systems for detecting sars cov 2 in b 1 1 7 lineage emergence
topic covid-19
sars-cov-2
point of care testing
molecular diagnostics
sample to answer
variant of concern
url https://www.dovepress.com/clinical-comparison-of-three-sample-to-answer-systems-for-detecting-sa-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IDR
work_keys_str_mv AT jianmj clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT chunghy clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT changck clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT linjc clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT yehkm clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT chencw clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT lisy clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT hsiehss clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT liumt clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT yangjr clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT tangsh clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT perngcl clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT changfy clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence
AT shanghs clinicalcomparisonofthreesampletoanswersystemsfordetectingsarscov2inb117lineageemergence