Une question interdite
Is legal history a left-over or is it waiting for a takeover bid (just like a company in serious trouble) which would allow the expression of new analyses and outlines for a better understanding of the contemporary western world? Its propositions of erudition, are they just interesting for small aca...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
2003-01-01
|
Series: | Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg03_debatte_legendre.pdf |
_version_ | 1819276776158789632 |
---|---|
author | Pierre Legendre |
author_facet | Pierre Legendre |
author_sort | Pierre Legendre |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Is legal history a left-over or is it waiting for a takeover bid (just like a company in serious trouble) which would allow the expression of new analyses and outlines for a better understanding of the contemporary western world? Its propositions of erudition, are they just interesting for small academic circles, or could they open a new pathway for fundamental reflections on the phenomenon of norms in general and the structure of its evolution in the special case of norm-production coming from Roman Christianity? And what is the significance of the idea of »legal tradition«, an idea forged in Western Europe, within the framework of a presumed global westernization without any counter-balance? The essay discusses the illegibility of legal history in today’s culture. Under the well reflected motto »The Forbidden Question« it concludes firmly: To renovate itself, this discipline has to perform its work in a new way, guided by a very precise and distinct vision on theory. The author examines the conditions for this. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T23:45:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-eeb9419f4d464dce99875d6dfd5c76ec |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1619-4993 2195-9617 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T23:45:35Z |
publishDate | 2003-01-01 |
publisher | Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory |
record_format | Article |
series | Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History |
spelling | doaj.art-eeb9419f4d464dce99875d6dfd5c76ec2022-12-21T17:25:32ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172003-01-01Rg 03333710.12946/rg03/033-037171Une question interditePierre LegendreIs legal history a left-over or is it waiting for a takeover bid (just like a company in serious trouble) which would allow the expression of new analyses and outlines for a better understanding of the contemporary western world? Its propositions of erudition, are they just interesting for small academic circles, or could they open a new pathway for fundamental reflections on the phenomenon of norms in general and the structure of its evolution in the special case of norm-production coming from Roman Christianity? And what is the significance of the idea of »legal tradition«, an idea forged in Western Europe, within the framework of a presumed global westernization without any counter-balance? The essay discusses the illegibility of legal history in today’s culture. Under the well reflected motto »The Forbidden Question« it concludes firmly: To renovate itself, this discipline has to perform its work in a new way, guided by a very precise and distinct vision on theory. The author examines the conditions for this.http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg03_debatte_legendre.pdfMPIeR |
spellingShingle | Pierre Legendre Une question interdite Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History MPIeR |
title | Une question interdite |
title_full | Une question interdite |
title_fullStr | Une question interdite |
title_full_unstemmed | Une question interdite |
title_short | Une question interdite |
title_sort | une question interdite |
topic | MPIeR |
url | http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg03_debatte_legendre.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pierrelegendre unequestioninterdite |