The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia

Background: Adverse events are frequent in clinical practice, but only a few studies in Saudi Arabia have addressed them. The current study was designed to review the lawsuits against healthcare professionals by analyzing records of the cases dealt with by the Medico-legal Committees (MLC) in variou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamal S AlJarallah, Norah AlRowaiss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Family and Community Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfcmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2230-8229;year=2013;volume=20;issue=2;spage=98;epage=105;aulast=AlJarallah
_version_ 1818904607184650240
author Jamal S AlJarallah
Norah AlRowaiss
author_facet Jamal S AlJarallah
Norah AlRowaiss
author_sort Jamal S AlJarallah
collection DOAJ
description Background: Adverse events are frequent in clinical practice, but only a few studies in Saudi Arabia have addressed them. The current study was designed to review the lawsuits against healthcare professionals by analyzing records of the cases dealt with by the Medico-legal Committees (MLC) in various provinces in Saudi Arabia, in order to determine the pattern of medical errors and litigations in the country. Materials and Methods: A pre-designed data sheet was used to collect data from the records of the Medical Violation Committee (MVC) and the Medical Jurisprudence Committee (MJC). The data sheets consisted of information on details of the cases, details on where the error had occurred, and details of the errors. Results: The review of records revealed 642 cases, most of which were from hospitals run by the Ministry of Health (MOH). The operating room was where most of the errors (20.4%) had occurred, followed by the emergency room (18.1%). Surgery was at the top of the specialties (25.1%). Most of the deaths occurred in surgery and obstetrics (about 25% for each), followed by other medical specialties (17%). About half of the lawsuit cases studied (46.5%) involved patients belonging to a relatively young age group (20-50 years). Conclusion: Most of the medical error litigations involved surgeons and obstetricians especially in MOH hospitals. The process of litigations and documentation need to be improved, and access to the records for research and education need to be made easier. In addition, there is a need for more prospective field studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:10:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eee48a07614b4634aa7bf0db8990a532
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2230-8229
2229-340X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:10:07Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family and Community Medicine
spelling doaj.art-eee48a07614b4634aa7bf0db8990a5322022-12-21T20:05:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family and Community Medicine2230-82292229-340X2013-01-012029810510.4103/2230-8229.114771The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi ArabiaJamal S AlJarallahNorah AlRowaissBackground: Adverse events are frequent in clinical practice, but only a few studies in Saudi Arabia have addressed them. The current study was designed to review the lawsuits against healthcare professionals by analyzing records of the cases dealt with by the Medico-legal Committees (MLC) in various provinces in Saudi Arabia, in order to determine the pattern of medical errors and litigations in the country. Materials and Methods: A pre-designed data sheet was used to collect data from the records of the Medical Violation Committee (MVC) and the Medical Jurisprudence Committee (MJC). The data sheets consisted of information on details of the cases, details on where the error had occurred, and details of the errors. Results: The review of records revealed 642 cases, most of which were from hospitals run by the Ministry of Health (MOH). The operating room was where most of the errors (20.4%) had occurred, followed by the emergency room (18.1%). Surgery was at the top of the specialties (25.1%). Most of the deaths occurred in surgery and obstetrics (about 25% for each), followed by other medical specialties (17%). About half of the lawsuit cases studied (46.5%) involved patients belonging to a relatively young age group (20-50 years). Conclusion: Most of the medical error litigations involved surgeons and obstetricians especially in MOH hospitals. The process of litigations and documentation need to be improved, and access to the records for research and education need to be made easier. In addition, there is a need for more prospective field studies.http://www.jfcmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2230-8229;year=2013;volume=20;issue=2;spage=98;epage=105;aulast=AlJarallahLitigationsmedical errorspatient safetySaudi Arabia
spellingShingle Jamal S AlJarallah
Norah AlRowaiss
The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia
Journal of Family and Community Medicine
Litigations
medical errors
patient safety
Saudi Arabia
title The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia
title_full The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia
title_short The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia
title_sort pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in saudi arabia
topic Litigations
medical errors
patient safety
Saudi Arabia
url http://www.jfcmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2230-8229;year=2013;volume=20;issue=2;spage=98;epage=105;aulast=AlJarallah
work_keys_str_mv AT jamalsaljarallah thepatternofmedicalerrorsandlitigationagainstdoctorsinsaudiarabia
AT norahalrowaiss thepatternofmedicalerrorsandlitigationagainstdoctorsinsaudiarabia
AT jamalsaljarallah patternofmedicalerrorsandlitigationagainstdoctorsinsaudiarabia
AT norahalrowaiss patternofmedicalerrorsandlitigationagainstdoctorsinsaudiarabia