Perils from Within and Without

<p>The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is described as one of the few success stories of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA). In contrast to the state-level legislature, the Court’s decision-making process in principle cannot be vetoed. Voting rules do not condition the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harun Išerić, Maja Sahadžić
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH 2023-07-01
Series:Verfassungsblog
Subjects:
Online Access:https://verfassungsblog.de/perils-from-within-and-without/
_version_ 1797771401016377344
author Harun Išerić
Maja Sahadžić
author_facet Harun Išerić
Maja Sahadžić
author_sort Harun Išerić
collection DOAJ
description <p>The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is described as one of the few success stories of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA). In contrast to the state-level legislature, the Court’s decision-making process in principle cannot be vetoed. Voting rules do not condition the presence of all three ethnic groups. This has made it difficult for Republika Srpska’s (RS) political leadership to block, boycott or undermine the work of the Court compared to other state-level institutions. However, recent months saw the RS identifying and seizing a rare moment of vulnerability with potentially severe consequences. If RS does not elect new judges in the meantime, not even a Court’s small chamber will be able to operate.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:36:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eee58330ef6e41439e23b5af04c99d5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2366-7044
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:36:01Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
record_format Article
series Verfassungsblog
spelling doaj.art-eee58330ef6e41439e23b5af04c99d5c2023-07-27T07:23:45ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442023-07-012366-7044Perils from Within and WithoutHarun IšerićMaja Sahadžić<p>The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is described as one of the few success stories of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA). In contrast to the state-level legislature, the Court’s decision-making process in principle cannot be vetoed. Voting rules do not condition the presence of all three ethnic groups. This has made it difficult for Republika Srpska’s (RS) political leadership to block, boycott or undermine the work of the Court compared to other state-level institutions. However, recent months saw the RS identifying and seizing a rare moment of vulnerability with potentially severe consequences. If RS does not elect new judges in the meantime, not even a Court’s small chamber will be able to operate.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/perils-from-within-and-without/Bosnia and Herzegovina, Constitutional Court, Ethnic Power-sharing, High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina
spellingShingle Harun Išerić
Maja Sahadžić
Perils from Within and Without
Verfassungsblog
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Constitutional Court, Ethnic Power-sharing, High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina
title Perils from Within and Without
title_full Perils from Within and Without
title_fullStr Perils from Within and Without
title_full_unstemmed Perils from Within and Without
title_short Perils from Within and Without
title_sort perils from within and without
topic Bosnia and Herzegovina, Constitutional Court, Ethnic Power-sharing, High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina
url https://verfassungsblog.de/perils-from-within-and-without/
work_keys_str_mv AT haruniseric perilsfromwithinandwithout
AT majasahadzic perilsfromwithinandwithout