Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological Dynamics

This study explored the differences in match play between elite and semi-elite Australian football (AF) conceptualised through the lens of ecological dynamics. We sampled naturalistic constraints from match play across two AF competitions (elite and semi-elite) and heuristically classified them into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carl T. Woods, James Jarvis, Ian McKeown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-06-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/7/159
_version_ 1798004004869898240
author Carl T. Woods
James Jarvis
Ian McKeown
author_facet Carl T. Woods
James Jarvis
Ian McKeown
author_sort Carl T. Woods
collection DOAJ
description This study explored the differences in match play between elite and semi-elite Australian football (AF) conceptualised through the lens of ecological dynamics. We sampled naturalistic constraints from match play across two AF competitions (elite and semi-elite) and heuristically classified them into <i>task</i>, <i>environmental</i> and <i>individual</i> classes. Data was extracted from 22 Australian Football League (AFL) games, and 18 semi-elite AF games, with a total of six constraints being sampled from each game. Match play within the AFL generated a greater percent of total disposals in general play within a processing time of 0&#8722;1s (<i>d</i> = 1.24 (0.64&#8722;1.80)), a greater opposition density surrounding the ball carrier (<i>d</i> = 0.82 (0.26&#8722;1.37)), and more disposals being performed while running (dynamic; <i>d</i> = 0.89 (0.33&#8722;1.45)). This data highlights differences with regards to the informational sources available to players across both competition standards to inform their movement choices. Specifically, a greater proportion of disposals within the AFL appear to be shaped by pronounced temporal and spatial constraints relative to a semi-elite competition. Coaches are encouraged to consider these results when developing representative training activities for both AFL and prospective AFL players.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:16:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eee64dc9baaa4a86bb904c6623615b51
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4663
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:16:41Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj.art-eee64dc9baaa4a86bb904c6623615b512022-12-22T04:24:18ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632019-06-017715910.3390/sports7070159sports7070159Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological DynamicsCarl T. Woods0James Jarvis1Ian McKeown2Football Department, Port Adelaide Football Club, South Australia, Adelaide 5014, AustraliaFootball Department, Port Adelaide Football Club, South Australia, Adelaide 5014, AustraliaFootball Department, Port Adelaide Football Club, South Australia, Adelaide 5014, AustraliaThis study explored the differences in match play between elite and semi-elite Australian football (AF) conceptualised through the lens of ecological dynamics. We sampled naturalistic constraints from match play across two AF competitions (elite and semi-elite) and heuristically classified them into <i>task</i>, <i>environmental</i> and <i>individual</i> classes. Data was extracted from 22 Australian Football League (AFL) games, and 18 semi-elite AF games, with a total of six constraints being sampled from each game. Match play within the AFL generated a greater percent of total disposals in general play within a processing time of 0&#8722;1s (<i>d</i> = 1.24 (0.64&#8722;1.80)), a greater opposition density surrounding the ball carrier (<i>d</i> = 0.82 (0.26&#8722;1.37)), and more disposals being performed while running (dynamic; <i>d</i> = 0.89 (0.33&#8722;1.45)). This data highlights differences with regards to the informational sources available to players across both competition standards to inform their movement choices. Specifically, a greater proportion of disposals within the AFL appear to be shaped by pronounced temporal and spatial constraints relative to a semi-elite competition. Coaches are encouraged to consider these results when developing representative training activities for both AFL and prospective AFL players.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/7/159skill acquisitionecological dynamicsperformance analysisnon-linear pedagogyinterdisciplinary research
spellingShingle Carl T. Woods
James Jarvis
Ian McKeown
Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological Dynamics
Sports
skill acquisition
ecological dynamics
performance analysis
non-linear pedagogy
interdisciplinary research
title Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological Dynamics
title_full Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological Dynamics
title_fullStr Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological Dynamics
title_short Differences between Elite and Semi-Elite Australian Football Conceptualised through the Lens of Ecological Dynamics
title_sort differences between elite and semi elite australian football conceptualised through the lens of ecological dynamics
topic skill acquisition
ecological dynamics
performance analysis
non-linear pedagogy
interdisciplinary research
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/7/159
work_keys_str_mv AT carltwoods differencesbetweeneliteandsemieliteaustralianfootballconceptualisedthroughthelensofecologicaldynamics
AT jamesjarvis differencesbetweeneliteandsemieliteaustralianfootballconceptualisedthroughthelensofecologicaldynamics
AT ianmckeown differencesbetweeneliteandsemieliteaustralianfootballconceptualisedthroughthelensofecologicaldynamics