PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION

Aim. To carry out a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of two different types of antihypertensive therapy in patients with arterial hypertension (HT). Material and methods. 38 patients with essential HT (aged 18 to 70 years, 11 males and 27 females) associated with metabolic syndrome, and having...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. I. Tarlovskaya, N. S. Maksimchuk, S. V. Malchikova, M. V. Avksentieva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Столичная издательская компания 2015-12-01
Series:Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/547
_version_ 1826949864657780736
author E. I. Tarlovskaya
N. S. Maksimchuk
S. V. Malchikova
M. V. Avksentieva
author_facet E. I. Tarlovskaya
N. S. Maksimchuk
S. V. Malchikova
M. V. Avksentieva
author_sort E. I. Tarlovskaya
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To carry out a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of two different types of antihypertensive therapy in patients with arterial hypertension (HT). Material and methods. 38 patients with essential HT (aged 18 to 70 years, 11 males and 27 females) associated with metabolic syndrome, and having a history of previous ineffective antihypertensive therapy were included into the study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients of V/A group received a fixed combination of valsartan and amlodipine (Exforge, Novartis) in dose of 5/160 and 10/160 mg depending on blood pressure (BP) level. Patients of L/A group received losartan (Lorista, KRKA) in dose of 100 mg and amlodipine (Tenox, KRKA) in dose of 5 and 10 mg. Treatment duration was 24 weeks. If target level of BP was not achieved during 12 weeks, indapamide retard was added to the therapies (Ravel SR, KRKA). Dinamics of BP and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were considered. Cost-effectiveness method of analysis was used. Results. In V/A group 75% of patients achieved target BP levels for 24 weeks, while in L/A group — 33.3% of patients, and 16.7% of patients more after indapamide addition. L/A therapy cost was lower in comparison with this of V/A therapy: 57864.24 vs 156671.0 rubles per 24 weeks, respectively. Calculation shows that additional cost of 669.23 rubles during 24 weeks is needed to achieve BP target level in every next patient when V/A therapy is used instead of L/A therapy. LVMI reduction by 1% took 1015.13 rubles cost in V/A group and almost 6 times more in L/A group. Conclusion. Pharmacoeconomic analysis revealed that generic combination of L/A is the most cost-effective for BP reduction. Very low cost is required to achieve additional effect with original fixed V/A combination. V/A combination is the most economical for the left ventricular hypertrophy reduction. Thus, V/A combination is rational for use in HT patients with severe target-organs damage.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:05:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eefe862897de4f52832e2ba8b6e78bc7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1819-6446
2225-3653
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-17T22:21:31Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Столичная издательская компания
record_format Article
series Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
spelling doaj.art-eefe862897de4f52832e2ba8b6e78bc72024-12-04T11:48:04ZengСтоличная издательская компанияРациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии1819-64462225-36532015-12-018217317810.20996/1819-6446-2012-8-2-47-52547PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSIONE. I. Tarlovskaya0N. S. Maksimchuk1S. V. Malchikova2M. V. Avksentieva3Kirov State Medical AcademyKirov State Medical AcademyKirov State Medical AcademyThe Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. PirogovAim. To carry out a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of two different types of antihypertensive therapy in patients with arterial hypertension (HT). Material and methods. 38 patients with essential HT (aged 18 to 70 years, 11 males and 27 females) associated with metabolic syndrome, and having a history of previous ineffective antihypertensive therapy were included into the study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients of V/A group received a fixed combination of valsartan and amlodipine (Exforge, Novartis) in dose of 5/160 and 10/160 mg depending on blood pressure (BP) level. Patients of L/A group received losartan (Lorista, KRKA) in dose of 100 mg and amlodipine (Tenox, KRKA) in dose of 5 and 10 mg. Treatment duration was 24 weeks. If target level of BP was not achieved during 12 weeks, indapamide retard was added to the therapies (Ravel SR, KRKA). Dinamics of BP and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were considered. Cost-effectiveness method of analysis was used. Results. In V/A group 75% of patients achieved target BP levels for 24 weeks, while in L/A group — 33.3% of patients, and 16.7% of patients more after indapamide addition. L/A therapy cost was lower in comparison with this of V/A therapy: 57864.24 vs 156671.0 rubles per 24 weeks, respectively. Calculation shows that additional cost of 669.23 rubles during 24 weeks is needed to achieve BP target level in every next patient when V/A therapy is used instead of L/A therapy. LVMI reduction by 1% took 1015.13 rubles cost in V/A group and almost 6 times more in L/A group. Conclusion. Pharmacoeconomic analysis revealed that generic combination of L/A is the most cost-effective for BP reduction. Very low cost is required to achieve additional effect with original fixed V/A combination. V/A combination is the most economical for the left ventricular hypertrophy reduction. Thus, V/A combination is rational for use in HT patients with severe target-organs damage.https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/547arterial hypertensionfixed combinationvalsartanlosartanamlodipineleft ventricular mass index
spellingShingle E. I. Tarlovskaya
N. S. Maksimchuk
S. V. Malchikova
M. V. Avksentieva
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
arterial hypertension
fixed combination
valsartan
losartan
amlodipine
left ventricular mass index
title PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_full PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_fullStr PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_full_unstemmed PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_short PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF COMPARATIVE PHARMACOECONOMIC PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT THERAPIES OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
title_sort preliminary results of comparative pharmacoeconomic prospective study of different therapies of arterial hypertension
topic arterial hypertension
fixed combination
valsartan
losartan
amlodipine
left ventricular mass index
url https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/547
work_keys_str_mv AT eitarlovskaya preliminaryresultsofcomparativepharmacoeconomicprospectivestudyofdifferenttherapiesofarterialhypertension
AT nsmaksimchuk preliminaryresultsofcomparativepharmacoeconomicprospectivestudyofdifferenttherapiesofarterialhypertension
AT svmalchikova preliminaryresultsofcomparativepharmacoeconomicprospectivestudyofdifferenttherapiesofarterialhypertension
AT mvavksentieva preliminaryresultsofcomparativepharmacoeconomicprospectivestudyofdifferenttherapiesofarterialhypertension