Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in China

Background/PurposeMetabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed as a new definition to put emphasis on the metabolic aspects of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aim to compare the cardiovascular and renal burden between MAFLD and NAFLD patients.Methods12183 participants w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuying Wang, Yuetian Yu, Haojie Zhang, Chi Chen, Heng Wan, Yi Chen, Fangzhen Xia, Shiyan Yu, Ningjian Wang, Lin Ye, Yingli Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.968766/full
_version_ 1798039753602367488
author Yuying Wang
Yuetian Yu
Haojie Zhang
Chi Chen
Heng Wan
Yi Chen
Fangzhen Xia
Shiyan Yu
Ningjian Wang
Lin Ye
Yingli Lu
author_facet Yuying Wang
Yuetian Yu
Haojie Zhang
Chi Chen
Heng Wan
Yi Chen
Fangzhen Xia
Shiyan Yu
Ningjian Wang
Lin Ye
Yingli Lu
author_sort Yuying Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background/PurposeMetabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed as a new definition to put emphasis on the metabolic aspects of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aim to compare the cardiovascular and renal burden between MAFLD and NAFLD patients.Methods12183 participants were enrolled in East China. The cardiovascular burden (Framingham risk score and previous cardiovascular diseases (CVD)) and renal burden (eGFR and chronic kidney disease (CKD)) were measured.ResultsThe risk of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, overweight/obesity, and central obesity of MAFLD patients were higher than those of NAFLD. Patients with MAFLD have a similar or higher beta coefficients in Framingham risk score [beta (95%CI): male 0.062 (0.055,0.069) vs 0.041 (0.033,0.048); female 0.014 (0.012,0.016) vs 0.012 (0.01,0.014)], and higher odds ratio in previous CVD [odds ratio (95%CI): male 1.50 (1.22,1.85) vs 1.35 (1.1,1.66); female 1.58 (1.33,1.87) vs 1.45 (1.22,1.72)], compared with those with NAFLD. However, compared with males with MAFLD, the odds ratio of CKD was higher in those with NAFLD [eGFR: -2.731 (-3.422, -2.041) vs-3.578 (-4.268, -2.887). CKD: 1.44 (1.05,1.96) vs 1.56 (1.14,2.12)]. In female, CKD was only marginally associated with NAFLD [0.8 (0.62,1.02), P=0.075], but not MAFLD [0.87 (0.68,1.11), P=0.268].ConclusionsPatients with MAFLD have a similar or higher risk of future and previous CVD compared with those with NAFLD, but the risk of CKD was higher in male with NAFLD.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:58:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef0f6aba9ea64de2884cfeab510c6a2f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:58:06Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-ef0f6aba9ea64de2884cfeab510c6a2f2022-12-22T04:01:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922022-09-011310.3389/fendo.2022.968766968766Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in ChinaYuying WangYuetian YuHaojie ZhangChi ChenHeng WanYi ChenFangzhen XiaShiyan YuNingjian WangLin YeYingli LuBackground/PurposeMetabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed as a new definition to put emphasis on the metabolic aspects of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aim to compare the cardiovascular and renal burden between MAFLD and NAFLD patients.Methods12183 participants were enrolled in East China. The cardiovascular burden (Framingham risk score and previous cardiovascular diseases (CVD)) and renal burden (eGFR and chronic kidney disease (CKD)) were measured.ResultsThe risk of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, overweight/obesity, and central obesity of MAFLD patients were higher than those of NAFLD. Patients with MAFLD have a similar or higher beta coefficients in Framingham risk score [beta (95%CI): male 0.062 (0.055,0.069) vs 0.041 (0.033,0.048); female 0.014 (0.012,0.016) vs 0.012 (0.01,0.014)], and higher odds ratio in previous CVD [odds ratio (95%CI): male 1.50 (1.22,1.85) vs 1.35 (1.1,1.66); female 1.58 (1.33,1.87) vs 1.45 (1.22,1.72)], compared with those with NAFLD. However, compared with males with MAFLD, the odds ratio of CKD was higher in those with NAFLD [eGFR: -2.731 (-3.422, -2.041) vs-3.578 (-4.268, -2.887). CKD: 1.44 (1.05,1.96) vs 1.56 (1.14,2.12)]. In female, CKD was only marginally associated with NAFLD [0.8 (0.62,1.02), P=0.075], but not MAFLD [0.87 (0.68,1.11), P=0.268].ConclusionsPatients with MAFLD have a similar or higher risk of future and previous CVD compared with those with NAFLD, but the risk of CKD was higher in male with NAFLD.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.968766/fullCVDCKDMAFLDNAFLDChina
spellingShingle Yuying Wang
Yuetian Yu
Haojie Zhang
Chi Chen
Heng Wan
Yi Chen
Fangzhen Xia
Shiyan Yu
Ningjian Wang
Lin Ye
Yingli Lu
Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in China
Frontiers in Endocrinology
CVD
CKD
MAFLD
NAFLD
China
title Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in China
title_full Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in China
title_fullStr Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in China
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in China
title_short Cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with MAFLD and NAFLD in China
title_sort cardiovascular and renal burdens among patients with mafld and nafld in china
topic CVD
CKD
MAFLD
NAFLD
China
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.968766/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyingwang cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT yuetianyu cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT haojiezhang cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT chichen cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT hengwan cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT yichen cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT fangzhenxia cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT shiyanyu cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT ningjianwang cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT linye cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina
AT yinglilu cardiovascularandrenalburdensamongpatientswithmafldandnafldinchina