"Not a Something"

Wittgenstein’s remark in section 304 of the Investigations that a sensation “is not a something, but not a nothing either” has often been connected with his critique of the “picture of an inner process”, and there is a temptation to read “something” as meaning “something private”. I argue that his r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roger Teichmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nordic Wittgenstein Society 2017-06-01
Series:Nordic Wittgenstein Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3446
_version_ 1819210612637433856
author Roger Teichmann
author_facet Roger Teichmann
author_sort Roger Teichmann
collection DOAJ
description Wittgenstein’s remark in section 304 of the Investigations that a sensation “is not a something, but not a nothing either” has often been connected with his critique of the “picture of an inner process”, and there is a temptation to read “something” as meaning “something private”. I argue that his remark should be taken more at face value, and that we can understand its purport via a consideration of the notion of consisting in. I explore this multi-faceted notion and its connection with (an extended version of) the Context Principle, beginning with the case of certain “propositional attitudes” and moving on to sensations. Wittgenstein was right to think it a philosophical prejudice to say that X’s being in pain, say, must consist in, be constituted by, something.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T06:13:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef17ef7c30994363afd032ac93ab97c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2194-6825
2242-248X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T06:13:57Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Nordic Wittgenstein Society
record_format Article
series Nordic Wittgenstein Review
spelling doaj.art-ef17ef7c30994363afd032ac93ab97c52022-12-21T17:57:22ZengNordic Wittgenstein SocietyNordic Wittgenstein Review2194-68252242-248X2017-06-016193010.15845/nwr.v6i1.34463446"Not a Something"Roger Teichmann0St Hilda's College, OxfordWittgenstein’s remark in section 304 of the Investigations that a sensation “is not a something, but not a nothing either” has often been connected with his critique of the “picture of an inner process”, and there is a temptation to read “something” as meaning “something private”. I argue that his remark should be taken more at face value, and that we can understand its purport via a consideration of the notion of consisting in. I explore this multi-faceted notion and its connection with (an extended version of) the Context Principle, beginning with the case of certain “propositional attitudes” and moving on to sensations. Wittgenstein was right to think it a philosophical prejudice to say that X’s being in pain, say, must consist in, be constituted by, something.http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3446sensationsWittgenstein LudwigPhilosophical Investigations
spellingShingle Roger Teichmann
"Not a Something"
Nordic Wittgenstein Review
sensations
Wittgenstein Ludwig
Philosophical Investigations
title "Not a Something"
title_full "Not a Something"
title_fullStr "Not a Something"
title_full_unstemmed "Not a Something"
title_short "Not a Something"
title_sort not a something
topic sensations
Wittgenstein Ludwig
Philosophical Investigations
url http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3446
work_keys_str_mv AT rogerteichmann notasomething