Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care Unit

Background Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is one of the most commonly performed procedures on critically ill patients, and many studies have shown the safety and feasibility of PDT, but there is limited data of PDT in neurocritical care units. We described our experience on PDT perform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dong Hyun Lee, Jin-Heon Jeong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Neurocritical Care Society 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Neurocritical Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-jnc.org/upload/pdf/jnc-170031.pdf
_version_ 1818864464626188288
author Dong Hyun Lee
Jin-Heon Jeong
author_facet Dong Hyun Lee
Jin-Heon Jeong
author_sort Dong Hyun Lee
collection DOAJ
description Background Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is one of the most commonly performed procedures on critically ill patients, and many studies have shown the safety and feasibility of PDT, but there is limited data of PDT in neurocritical care units. We described our experience on PDT performed by neurointensivist. Methods The PDTs were performed by a neurointensivist at the bedside using the Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique. To confirm a secure puncture site, the PDT was done under fiberoptic bronchoscopic guidance. From September 2015 to August 2017, procedural data were prospectively collected, and the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed immediate complications of PDT as the primary outcome. Results The PDTs were performed for 46 patients; and the mean age was 65.9 years, 26 (56.5%) were male, and the mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score was 20.5. Overall, the procedural success rate was 100%, and the mean procedural time was 19.7±9.3 minutes. Periprocedural complications occurred in 13 (28.3%) patients; with 10 having minor bleeding and three having a tracheal ring fracture. There were no serious periprocedural complications of PDT. Conclusion From our experience, the PDT in the neurocritical care unit was safe and feasible and was implemented without serious complications.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T10:32:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef271d631fd747ca88b8ae5fe39b74e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2005-0348
2508-1349
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T10:32:04Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher The Korean Neurocritical Care Society
record_format Article
series Journal of Neurocritical Care
spelling doaj.art-ef271d631fd747ca88b8ae5fe39b74e12022-12-21T20:25:44ZengThe Korean Neurocritical Care SocietyJournal of Neurocritical Care2005-03482508-13492018-06-01111323810.18700/jnc.170031276Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care UnitDong Hyun Lee0Jin-Heon Jeong1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, KoreaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, KoreaBackground Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is one of the most commonly performed procedures on critically ill patients, and many studies have shown the safety and feasibility of PDT, but there is limited data of PDT in neurocritical care units. We described our experience on PDT performed by neurointensivist. Methods The PDTs were performed by a neurointensivist at the bedside using the Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique. To confirm a secure puncture site, the PDT was done under fiberoptic bronchoscopic guidance. From September 2015 to August 2017, procedural data were prospectively collected, and the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed immediate complications of PDT as the primary outcome. Results The PDTs were performed for 46 patients; and the mean age was 65.9 years, 26 (56.5%) were male, and the mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score was 20.5. Overall, the procedural success rate was 100%, and the mean procedural time was 19.7±9.3 minutes. Periprocedural complications occurred in 13 (28.3%) patients; with 10 having minor bleeding and three having a tracheal ring fracture. There were no serious periprocedural complications of PDT. Conclusion From our experience, the PDT in the neurocritical care unit was safe and feasible and was implemented without serious complications.http://www.e-jnc.org/upload/pdf/jnc-170031.pdfTracheostomySafetyCritical careHemorrhage
spellingShingle Dong Hyun Lee
Jin-Heon Jeong
Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care Unit
Journal of Neurocritical Care
Tracheostomy
Safety
Critical care
Hemorrhage
title Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care Unit
title_full Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care Unit
title_fullStr Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care Unit
title_short Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Neurocritical Care Unit
title_sort safety and feasibility of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the neurocritical care unit
topic Tracheostomy
Safety
Critical care
Hemorrhage
url http://www.e-jnc.org/upload/pdf/jnc-170031.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT donghyunlee safetyandfeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyintheneurocriticalcareunit
AT jinheonjeong safetyandfeasibilityofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyintheneurocriticalcareunit