Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort

Abstract Introduction: Under enrollment of participants in clinical research is costly and delays study completion to impact public health. Given that research personnel make decisions about which strategies to pursue and participants are the recipients of these efforts, we surveyed research staff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robin P. Goin-Kochel, Ivana Lozano, Gabrielle Duhon, Gabriela Marzano, Amy Daniels, J. Kiely Law, Katharine Diehl, LeeAnne Green Snyder, Pamela Feliciano, Wendy K. Chung, SPARK Consortium
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124005120/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797198751496929280
author Robin P. Goin-Kochel
Ivana Lozano
Gabrielle Duhon
Gabriela Marzano
Amy Daniels
J. Kiely Law
Katharine Diehl
LeeAnne Green Snyder
Pamela Feliciano
Wendy K. Chung
SPARK Consortium
author_facet Robin P. Goin-Kochel
Ivana Lozano
Gabrielle Duhon
Gabriela Marzano
Amy Daniels
J. Kiely Law
Katharine Diehl
LeeAnne Green Snyder
Pamela Feliciano
Wendy K. Chung
SPARK Consortium
author_sort Robin P. Goin-Kochel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction: Under enrollment of participants in clinical research is costly and delays study completion to impact public health. Given that research personnel make decisions about which strategies to pursue and participants are the recipients of these efforts, we surveyed research staff (n = 52) and participants (n = 4,144) affiliated with SPARK (Simons Foundation Powering Autism for Knowledge) – the largest study of autism in the U.S. – to understand their perceptions of effective recruitment strategies. Methods: In Study 1, research personnel were asked to report recruitment strategies that they tried for SPARK and to indicate which ones they would and would not repeat/recommend. In Study 2, SPARK participants were asked to indicate all the ways they heard about the study prior to enrollment and which one was most influential in their decisions to enroll. Results: Staff rated speaking with a SPARK-study-team member (36.5%), speaking with a medical provider (19.2%), word of mouth (11.5%), and a live TV news story (11.5%) as the most successful strategies. Participants most often heard about SPARK via social media (47.0%), speaking with a medical provider (23.1%), and an online search (20.1%). Research personnel’s and participants’ views on effective recruitment strategies often differed, with the exception of speaking with a medical provider. Conclusion: Results suggest that a combination of strategies is likely to be most effective in reaching diverse audiences. Findings have implications for the selection of strategies that meet a study’s specific needs, as well as recruitment-strategy “combinations” that may enhance the influence of outreach efforts.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:04:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef327776bfc843108a7025f0a48539a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:04:50Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-ef327776bfc843108a7025f0a48539a72024-04-22T04:32:33ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612024-01-01810.1017/cts.2024.512Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research CohortRobin P. Goin-Kochel0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6666-4369Ivana Lozano1Gabrielle Duhon2Gabriela Marzano3Amy Daniels4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-7993J. Kiely Law5Katharine Diehl6LeeAnne Green Snyder7Pamela Feliciano8Wendy K. Chung9SPARK ConsortiumBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USABaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USABaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USABaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USASimons Foundation, New York, NY, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USASimons Foundation, New York, NY, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USASimons Foundation, New York, NY, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USASimons Foundation, New York, NY, USASimons Foundation, New York, NY, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USASimons Foundation, New York, NY, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Abstract Introduction: Under enrollment of participants in clinical research is costly and delays study completion to impact public health. Given that research personnel make decisions about which strategies to pursue and participants are the recipients of these efforts, we surveyed research staff (n = 52) and participants (n = 4,144) affiliated with SPARK (Simons Foundation Powering Autism for Knowledge) – the largest study of autism in the U.S. – to understand their perceptions of effective recruitment strategies. Methods: In Study 1, research personnel were asked to report recruitment strategies that they tried for SPARK and to indicate which ones they would and would not repeat/recommend. In Study 2, SPARK participants were asked to indicate all the ways they heard about the study prior to enrollment and which one was most influential in their decisions to enroll. Results: Staff rated speaking with a SPARK-study-team member (36.5%), speaking with a medical provider (19.2%), word of mouth (11.5%), and a live TV news story (11.5%) as the most successful strategies. Participants most often heard about SPARK via social media (47.0%), speaking with a medical provider (23.1%), and an online search (20.1%). Research personnel’s and participants’ views on effective recruitment strategies often differed, with the exception of speaking with a medical provider. Conclusion: Results suggest that a combination of strategies is likely to be most effective in reaching diverse audiences. Findings have implications for the selection of strategies that meet a study’s specific needs, as well as recruitment-strategy “combinations” that may enhance the influence of outreach efforts. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124005120/type/journal_articleResearch recruitmentparticipant enrollmentautismparent/caregiver
spellingShingle Robin P. Goin-Kochel
Ivana Lozano
Gabrielle Duhon
Gabriela Marzano
Amy Daniels
J. Kiely Law
Katharine Diehl
LeeAnne Green Snyder
Pamela Feliciano
Wendy K. Chung
SPARK Consortium
Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Research recruitment
participant enrollment
autism
parent/caregiver
title Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort
title_full Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort
title_fullStr Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort
title_short Evidence-based recruitment strategies for clinical research: Study personnel’s and research participants’ perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a U.S. Autism-Research Cohort
title_sort evidence based recruitment strategies for clinical research study personnel s and research participants perceptions about successful methods of outreach for a u s autism research cohort
topic Research recruitment
participant enrollment
autism
parent/caregiver
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124005120/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT robinpgoinkochel evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT ivanalozano evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT gabrielleduhon evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT gabrielamarzano evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT amydaniels evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT jkielylaw evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT katharinediehl evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT leeannegreensnyder evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT pamelafeliciano evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT wendykchung evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort
AT sparkconsortium evidencebasedrecruitmentstrategiesforclinicalresearchstudypersonnelsandresearchparticipantsperceptionsaboutsuccessfulmethodsofoutreachforausautismresearchcohort