Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single path defibrillation shock methods have been improved through the use of the Charge Banking Model of defibrillation, which predicts the response of the heart to shocks as a simple resistor-capacitor (RC) circuit. While dual pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sweeney James D, Dosdall Derek J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-08-01
Series:BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Online Access:http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/7/1/22
_version_ 1811246918318161920
author Sweeney James D
Dosdall Derek J
author_facet Sweeney James D
Dosdall Derek J
author_sort Sweeney James D
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single path defibrillation shock methods have been improved through the use of the Charge Banking Model of defibrillation, which predicts the response of the heart to shocks as a simple resistor-capacitor (RC) circuit. While dual path defibrillation configurations have significantly reduced defibrillation thresholds, improvements to dual path defibrillation techniques have been limited to experimental observations without a practical model to aid in improving dual path defibrillation techniques.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The Charge Banking Model has been extended into a new Extended Charge Banking Model of defibrillation that represents small sections of the heart as separate RC circuits, uses a weighting factor based on published defibrillation shock field gradient measures, and implements a critical mass criteria to predict the relative efficacy of single and dual path defibrillation shocks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The new model reproduced the results from several published experimental protocols that demonstrated the relative efficacy of dual path defibrillation shocks. The model predicts that time between phases or pulses of dual path defibrillation shock configurations should be minimized to maximize shock efficacy.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Through this approach the Extended Charge Banking Model predictions may be used to improve dual path and multi-pulse defibrillation techniques, which have been shown experimentally to lower defibrillation thresholds substantially. The new model may be a useful tool to help in further improving dual path and multiple pulse defibrillation techniques by predicting optimal pulse durations and shock timing parameters.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T15:00:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef3ec9054a89433ba8f2dadfd8ff5967
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-925X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T15:00:32Z
publishDate 2008-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BioMedical Engineering OnLine
spelling doaj.art-ef3ec9054a89433ba8f2dadfd8ff59672022-12-22T03:28:05ZengBMCBioMedical Engineering OnLine1475-925X2008-08-01712210.1186/1475-925X-7-22Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillatorsSweeney James DDosdall Derek J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Single path defibrillation shock methods have been improved through the use of the Charge Banking Model of defibrillation, which predicts the response of the heart to shocks as a simple resistor-capacitor (RC) circuit. While dual path defibrillation configurations have significantly reduced defibrillation thresholds, improvements to dual path defibrillation techniques have been limited to experimental observations without a practical model to aid in improving dual path defibrillation techniques.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The Charge Banking Model has been extended into a new Extended Charge Banking Model of defibrillation that represents small sections of the heart as separate RC circuits, uses a weighting factor based on published defibrillation shock field gradient measures, and implements a critical mass criteria to predict the relative efficacy of single and dual path defibrillation shocks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The new model reproduced the results from several published experimental protocols that demonstrated the relative efficacy of dual path defibrillation shocks. The model predicts that time between phases or pulses of dual path defibrillation shock configurations should be minimized to maximize shock efficacy.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Through this approach the Extended Charge Banking Model predictions may be used to improve dual path and multi-pulse defibrillation techniques, which have been shown experimentally to lower defibrillation thresholds substantially. The new model may be a useful tool to help in further improving dual path and multiple pulse defibrillation techniques by predicting optimal pulse durations and shock timing parameters.</p>http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/7/1/22
spellingShingle Sweeney James D
Dosdall Derek J
Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
title Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
title_full Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
title_fullStr Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
title_full_unstemmed Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
title_short Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
title_sort extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
url http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/7/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT sweeneyjamesd extendedchargebankingmodelofdualpathshocksforimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT dosdallderekj extendedchargebankingmodelofdualpathshocksforimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators