Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods

In this paper, the author investigated the stated preference survey in transport modelling. The research was conducted to ensure that the best fractional orthogonal design of stated preference paired comparison survey would not increase the error or uncertainty in transport-related decision modellin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tibor Sipos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences 2023-10-01
Series:Promet (Zagreb)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://traffic2.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/259
_version_ 1797644249367314432
author Tibor Sipos
author_facet Tibor Sipos
author_sort Tibor Sipos
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, the author investigated the stated preference survey in transport modelling. The research was conducted to ensure that the best fractional orthogonal design of stated preference paired comparison survey would not increase the error or uncertainty in transport-related decision modelling. The research was conducted based on artificial Monte Carlo simulated respondents, and the results were assessed with standard mathematical-statistical tools. Although the assessment should have resulted in 0% errors, according to our 2,000 sample, a minor 5% of errors occurred. The problem to be investigated in this paper is that the best-designed survey could have some errors.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:27:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef558a4018fd4651a7a3083945d24f0b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0353-5320
1848-4069
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:27:41Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences
record_format Article
series Promet (Zagreb)
spelling doaj.art-ef558a4018fd4651a7a3083945d24f0b2023-10-31T14:49:46ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic SciencesPromet (Zagreb)0353-53201848-40692023-10-0135565566110.7307/ptt.v35i5.259259Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical MethodsTibor Sipos0Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Transport Engineering and Vehicle EngineeringIn this paper, the author investigated the stated preference survey in transport modelling. The research was conducted to ensure that the best fractional orthogonal design of stated preference paired comparison survey would not increase the error or uncertainty in transport-related decision modelling. The research was conducted based on artificial Monte Carlo simulated respondents, and the results were assessed with standard mathematical-statistical tools. Although the assessment should have resulted in 0% errors, according to our 2,000 sample, a minor 5% of errors occurred. The problem to be investigated in this paper is that the best-designed survey could have some errors.https://traffic2.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/259stated preference surveywillingness to paymonetary value of travel time
spellingShingle Tibor Sipos
Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods
Promet (Zagreb)
stated preference survey
willingness to pay
monetary value of travel time
title Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods
title_full Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods
title_short Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods
title_sort evaluation of stated preference surveys with statistical methods
topic stated preference survey
willingness to pay
monetary value of travel time
url https://traffic2.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/259
work_keys_str_mv AT tiborsipos evaluationofstatedpreferencesurveyswithstatisticalmethods