Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

BackgroundIt has been observed that eating is influenced by the presence and availability of food. Being aware of the presence of food in the environment may enable mobile health (mHealth) apps to use geofencing techniques to determine the most appropriate time to proactively deliver interventions....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elliston, Katherine G, Schüz, Benjamin, Albion, Tim, Ferguson, Stuart G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-07-01
Series:JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Online Access:https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/7/e15948
_version_ 1818917708236849152
author Elliston, Katherine G
Schüz, Benjamin
Albion, Tim
Ferguson, Stuart G
author_facet Elliston, Katherine G
Schüz, Benjamin
Albion, Tim
Ferguson, Stuart G
author_sort Elliston, Katherine G
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIt has been observed that eating is influenced by the presence and availability of food. Being aware of the presence of food in the environment may enable mobile health (mHealth) apps to use geofencing techniques to determine the most appropriate time to proactively deliver interventions. To date, however, studies on eating typically rely on self-reports of environmental contexts, which may not be accurate or feasible for issuing mHealth interventions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the subjective and geographic information system (GIS) assessments of the momentary food environment to explore the feasibility of using GIS data to predict eating behavior and inform geofenced interventions. MethodsIn total, 72 participants recorded their food intake in real-time for 14 days using an ecological momentary assessment approach. Participants logged their food intake and responded to approximately 5 randomly timed assessments each day. During each assessment, the participants reported the number and type of food outlets nearby. Their electronic diaries simultaneously recorded their GPS coordinates. The GPS data were later overlaid with a GIS map of food outlets to produce an objective count of the number of food outlets within 50 m of the participant. ResultsCorrelations between self-reported and GIS counts of food outlets within 50 m were only of a small size (r=0.17; P<.001). Logistic regression analyses revealed that the GIS count significantly predicted eating similar to the self-reported counts (area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC] self-report=0.53, SE 0.00 versus AUC-ROC 50 m GIS=0.53, SE 0.00; P=.41). However, there was a significant difference between the GIS-derived and self-reported counts of food outlets and the self-reported type of food outlets (AUC-ROC self-reported outlet type=0.56, SE 0.01; P<.001). ConclusionsThe subjective food environment appears to predict eating better than objectively measured food environments via GIS. mHealth apps may need to consider the type of food outlets rather than the raw number of outlets in an individual’s environment.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:38:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef62ab9eb68845d28701cb79567f939c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2291-5222
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:38:21Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR mHealth and uHealth
spelling doaj.art-ef62ab9eb68845d28701cb79567f939c2022-12-21T19:59:41ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222020-07-0187e1594810.2196/15948Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment StudyElliston, Katherine GSchüz, BenjaminAlbion, TimFerguson, Stuart GBackgroundIt has been observed that eating is influenced by the presence and availability of food. Being aware of the presence of food in the environment may enable mobile health (mHealth) apps to use geofencing techniques to determine the most appropriate time to proactively deliver interventions. To date, however, studies on eating typically rely on self-reports of environmental contexts, which may not be accurate or feasible for issuing mHealth interventions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the subjective and geographic information system (GIS) assessments of the momentary food environment to explore the feasibility of using GIS data to predict eating behavior and inform geofenced interventions. MethodsIn total, 72 participants recorded their food intake in real-time for 14 days using an ecological momentary assessment approach. Participants logged their food intake and responded to approximately 5 randomly timed assessments each day. During each assessment, the participants reported the number and type of food outlets nearby. Their electronic diaries simultaneously recorded their GPS coordinates. The GPS data were later overlaid with a GIS map of food outlets to produce an objective count of the number of food outlets within 50 m of the participant. ResultsCorrelations between self-reported and GIS counts of food outlets within 50 m were only of a small size (r=0.17; P<.001). Logistic regression analyses revealed that the GIS count significantly predicted eating similar to the self-reported counts (area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC] self-report=0.53, SE 0.00 versus AUC-ROC 50 m GIS=0.53, SE 0.00; P=.41). However, there was a significant difference between the GIS-derived and self-reported counts of food outlets and the self-reported type of food outlets (AUC-ROC self-reported outlet type=0.56, SE 0.01; P<.001). ConclusionsThe subjective food environment appears to predict eating better than objectively measured food environments via GIS. mHealth apps may need to consider the type of food outlets rather than the raw number of outlets in an individual’s environment.https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/7/e15948
spellingShingle Elliston, Katherine G
Schüz, Benjamin
Albion, Tim
Ferguson, Stuart G
Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
title Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
title_full Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
title_short Comparison of Geographic Information System and Subjective Assessments of Momentary Food Environments as Predictors of Food Intake: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
title_sort comparison of geographic information system and subjective assessments of momentary food environments as predictors of food intake an ecological momentary assessment study
url https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/7/e15948
work_keys_str_mv AT ellistonkatherineg comparisonofgeographicinformationsystemandsubjectiveassessmentsofmomentaryfoodenvironmentsaspredictorsoffoodintakeanecologicalmomentaryassessmentstudy
AT schuzbenjamin comparisonofgeographicinformationsystemandsubjectiveassessmentsofmomentaryfoodenvironmentsaspredictorsoffoodintakeanecologicalmomentaryassessmentstudy
AT albiontim comparisonofgeographicinformationsystemandsubjectiveassessmentsofmomentaryfoodenvironmentsaspredictorsoffoodintakeanecologicalmomentaryassessmentstudy
AT fergusonstuartg comparisonofgeographicinformationsystemandsubjectiveassessmentsofmomentaryfoodenvironmentsaspredictorsoffoodintakeanecologicalmomentaryassessmentstudy