Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents

Introduction: Laryngoscopy is one of the critical points in the intubation process and a mechanical trauma that provides noxious stimulation, affecting cardiovascular, respiratory, and intracranial changes. Practitioner competence is a significant factor that supports laryngoscope intubation procedu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christya Lorena, Agustina Salinding, Prananda Surya Airlangga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Airlangga, Faculty of Medicine 2021-07-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (IJAR)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/IJAR/article/view/25181
_version_ 1797765237658615808
author Christya Lorena
Agustina Salinding
Prananda Surya Airlangga
author_facet Christya Lorena
Agustina Salinding
Prananda Surya Airlangga
author_sort Christya Lorena
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Laryngoscopy is one of the critical points in the intubation process and a mechanical trauma that provides noxious stimulation, affecting cardiovascular, respiratory, and intracranial changes. Practitioner competence is a significant factor that supports laryngoscope intubation procedures. That can influence the intubation duration and amount of mechanical trauma besides caused by laryngoscope type. Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of using Macintosh blade compared to McCoy blade in intubation laryngoscopy by Anesthesia Residents. Materials and Methods: This research is an experimental study in adult patients who underwent elective surgery at GBPT Dr. Soetomo Hospital. Intubation did by Anesthesia Residents at levels 5-9 using Macintosh or McCoy Laryngoscope and chosen randomly.  The data of laryngeal visualization (Cormack Lehane), hemodynamics (blood pressure, pulse), pain scale (qNOX), intubation time length, and pain scale data (VAS) after extubation were taken during intubation laryngoscope. Result and Discussion: The study was conducted on 28 samples that met the criteria. Anesthesia Resident's competence levels based on the semester in both groups laryngoscopes were not different (p 0.868). Based on laryngeal visualization data laryngoscopy, the McCoy's blade had better visualization with CL 1 at 85.7% of the samples and p-value 0.020. This good visualization makes it possible to speed up the laryngoscope-intubation in the McCoy blade group with a significant difference of time compared to the Macintosh blade group. Hemodynamic parameters, there were significant differences for hemodynamics increase. In the Macintosh blade group, the blood pressure and pulse were significantly increased after laryngoscopy intubation. The pain scale during the intubation procedure, which was rated based on the qNOx score, showed a significant increase in the Macintosh blade group with a p-value of 0.003. The postoperative pain scale (VAS) was smaller in the McCoy blade group compared to the Macintosh group (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: The ability to use both laryngoscopes at some levels of Anesthesia residents was equally good, and the use of McCoy Blade is more effective than Macintosh Blade in the intubation laryngoscopy procedure.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:08:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef69997d61dc45aca6ac05bdb5afa492
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2722-4554
2686-021X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:08:13Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Universitas Airlangga, Faculty of Medicine
record_format Article
series Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (IJAR)
spelling doaj.art-ef69997d61dc45aca6ac05bdb5afa4922023-08-02T01:58:54ZengUniversitas Airlangga, Faculty of MedicineIndonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (IJAR)2722-45542686-021X2021-07-0132465310.20473/ijar.V3I22021.46-5320623Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia ResidentsChristya Lorena0Agustina Salinding1Prananda Surya Airlangga2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, IndonesiaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, IndonesiaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, IndonesiaIntroduction: Laryngoscopy is one of the critical points in the intubation process and a mechanical trauma that provides noxious stimulation, affecting cardiovascular, respiratory, and intracranial changes. Practitioner competence is a significant factor that supports laryngoscope intubation procedures. That can influence the intubation duration and amount of mechanical trauma besides caused by laryngoscope type. Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of using Macintosh blade compared to McCoy blade in intubation laryngoscopy by Anesthesia Residents. Materials and Methods: This research is an experimental study in adult patients who underwent elective surgery at GBPT Dr. Soetomo Hospital. Intubation did by Anesthesia Residents at levels 5-9 using Macintosh or McCoy Laryngoscope and chosen randomly.  The data of laryngeal visualization (Cormack Lehane), hemodynamics (blood pressure, pulse), pain scale (qNOX), intubation time length, and pain scale data (VAS) after extubation were taken during intubation laryngoscope. Result and Discussion: The study was conducted on 28 samples that met the criteria. Anesthesia Resident's competence levels based on the semester in both groups laryngoscopes were not different (p 0.868). Based on laryngeal visualization data laryngoscopy, the McCoy's blade had better visualization with CL 1 at 85.7% of the samples and p-value 0.020. This good visualization makes it possible to speed up the laryngoscope-intubation in the McCoy blade group with a significant difference of time compared to the Macintosh blade group. Hemodynamic parameters, there were significant differences for hemodynamics increase. In the Macintosh blade group, the blood pressure and pulse were significantly increased after laryngoscopy intubation. The pain scale during the intubation procedure, which was rated based on the qNOx score, showed a significant increase in the Macintosh blade group with a p-value of 0.003. The postoperative pain scale (VAS) was smaller in the McCoy blade group compared to the Macintosh group (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: The ability to use both laryngoscopes at some levels of Anesthesia residents was equally good, and the use of McCoy Blade is more effective than Macintosh Blade in the intubation laryngoscopy procedure.https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/IJAR/article/view/25181anesthesia residentseffectivenessmacintosh blademccoy blademedicinelaryngoscopyintubation
spellingShingle Christya Lorena
Agustina Salinding
Prananda Surya Airlangga
Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents
Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (IJAR)
anesthesia residents
effectiveness
macintosh blade
mccoy blade
medicine
laryngoscopy
intubation
title Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents
title_full Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents
title_fullStr Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents
title_short Effectiveness Comparison of Using Macintosh Blade and Mccoy Blade For Endotracheal Intubation In Anesthesia Residents
title_sort effectiveness comparison of using macintosh blade and mccoy blade for endotracheal intubation in anesthesia residents
topic anesthesia residents
effectiveness
macintosh blade
mccoy blade
medicine
laryngoscopy
intubation
url https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/IJAR/article/view/25181
work_keys_str_mv AT christyalorena effectivenesscomparisonofusingmacintoshbladeandmccoybladeforendotrachealintubationinanesthesiaresidents
AT agustinasalinding effectivenesscomparisonofusingmacintoshbladeandmccoybladeforendotrachealintubationinanesthesiaresidents
AT pranandasuryaairlangga effectivenesscomparisonofusingmacintoshbladeandmccoybladeforendotrachealintubationinanesthesiaresidents