Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial

Background and purpose — With a rapidly increasing population in need of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is renewed interest in cost-saving all-polyethylene designs. Differences between metal-backed and all-polyethylene designs in initial component migration assessed by radiostereometric analys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koen T Van Hamersveld, Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen, Rob G H H Nelissen, Sören Toksvig-Larsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2018-07-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1464317
_version_ 1819279564842467328
author Koen T Van Hamersveld
Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen
Rob G H H Nelissen
Sören Toksvig-Larsen
author_facet Koen T Van Hamersveld
Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen
Rob G H H Nelissen
Sören Toksvig-Larsen
author_sort Koen T Van Hamersveld
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose — With a rapidly increasing population in need of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is renewed interest in cost-saving all-polyethylene designs. Differences between metal-backed and all-polyethylene designs in initial component migration assessed by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), a proven predictor for late aseptic loosening, have been scantily reported. The purpose of this study was to compare implant migration and clinical outcomes of all-polyethylene tibial components versus metal-backed trays of similar geometrical shape. Patients and methods — In this randomized controlled trial, 59 patients received a cemented Triathlon condylar-stabilizing implant (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) with either an all-polyethylene (n = 29) or a metal-backed tibial component (n = 30). RSA measurements and clinical scores (the Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, and Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score) were evaluated at baseline and postoperatively at 3, 12, and 24 months. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurements. Results — A statistically significant difference in mean migration after 2 years was found in favor of the all-polyethylene group, with a mean maximum total point motion of 0.61 mm (95% CI 0.49–0.74) versus 0.81 mm (95% CI 0.68–0.96) for the cemented group (p = 0.03). However, this difference was smaller and not statistically significant after post hoc adjustment for surgeon effect. Both groups showed comparable improvements on all clinical outcome scores over time. Interpretation — The Triathlon all-polyethylene tibial component showed less migration, suggesting a lower risk of late loosening as compared with its metal-backed counterpart. However, the found surgeon effect warrants further investigation.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T00:29:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ef7716329d9a4f339c44457b3164eb07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T00:29:55Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Medical Journals Sweden
record_format Article
series Acta Orthopaedica
spelling doaj.art-ef7716329d9a4f339c44457b3164eb072022-12-21T17:24:17ZengMedical Journals SwedenActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822018-07-0189441241710.1080/17453674.2018.14643171464317Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trialKoen T Van Hamersveld0Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen1Rob G H H Nelissen2Sören Toksvig-Larsen3Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden University Medical CenterLeiden University Medical CenterHässleholm Hospital, HässleholmBackground and purpose — With a rapidly increasing population in need of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is renewed interest in cost-saving all-polyethylene designs. Differences between metal-backed and all-polyethylene designs in initial component migration assessed by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), a proven predictor for late aseptic loosening, have been scantily reported. The purpose of this study was to compare implant migration and clinical outcomes of all-polyethylene tibial components versus metal-backed trays of similar geometrical shape. Patients and methods — In this randomized controlled trial, 59 patients received a cemented Triathlon condylar-stabilizing implant (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) with either an all-polyethylene (n = 29) or a metal-backed tibial component (n = 30). RSA measurements and clinical scores (the Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, and Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score) were evaluated at baseline and postoperatively at 3, 12, and 24 months. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurements. Results — A statistically significant difference in mean migration after 2 years was found in favor of the all-polyethylene group, with a mean maximum total point motion of 0.61 mm (95% CI 0.49–0.74) versus 0.81 mm (95% CI 0.68–0.96) for the cemented group (p = 0.03). However, this difference was smaller and not statistically significant after post hoc adjustment for surgeon effect. Both groups showed comparable improvements on all clinical outcome scores over time. Interpretation — The Triathlon all-polyethylene tibial component showed less migration, suggesting a lower risk of late loosening as compared with its metal-backed counterpart. However, the found surgeon effect warrants further investigation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1464317
spellingShingle Koen T Van Hamersveld
Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen
Rob G H H Nelissen
Sören Toksvig-Larsen
Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
Acta Orthopaedica
title Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort migration of all polyethylene compared with metal backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty a randomized controlled trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1464317
work_keys_str_mv AT koentvanhamersveld migrationofallpolyethylenecomparedwithmetalbackedtibialcomponentsincementedtotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT perlajmarangvandemheen migrationofallpolyethylenecomparedwithmetalbackedtibialcomponentsincementedtotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT robghhnelissen migrationofallpolyethylenecomparedwithmetalbackedtibialcomponentsincementedtotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sorentoksviglarsen migrationofallpolyethylenecomparedwithmetalbackedtibialcomponentsincementedtotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial