The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control

Aims: To study the metabolic effects of fructose, glucose and saccharose in a moderate dose by analyzing changes of blood indicators, pancreas inflammation, liver fat accumulation and intestinal microbiota in normal Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Subjects and methods: Six-week-old rats were assigned to f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ge Song, Wentao Qi, Yong Wang, Shaojie Pang, Yong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swedish Nutrition Foundation 2021-05-01
Series:Food & Nutrition Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/5589/13351
_version_ 1819003784172404736
author Ge Song
Wentao Qi
Yong Wang
Shaojie Pang
Yong Li
author_facet Ge Song
Wentao Qi
Yong Wang
Shaojie Pang
Yong Li
author_sort Ge Song
collection DOAJ
description Aims: To study the metabolic effects of fructose, glucose and saccharose in a moderate dose by analyzing changes of blood indicators, pancreas inflammation, liver fat accumulation and intestinal microbiota in normal Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Subjects and methods: Six-week-old rats were assigned to four groups (n = 10), which were gavaged with normalsaline (Con), glucose dissolved in normal saline (Glu), saccharose-glucose dissolved in normal saline (Sac), and fructose dissolved in normal saline (Fru) for 20 weeks. Results: No significant differences in body weight and blood parameters including total cholesterol (TC), total triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), lipase (LPS) and free fatty acid (FFA) among the Con, Glu, Sac and the Fru group. The fructose can significantly (P < 0.05) decrease fasting and postprandial blood glucose increase compared to glucose, and the risk of pancreas inflammation and liver fat accumulation induced by fructose is lower than glucose in rats. We found there were no significant differences in intestinal microbial diversity. At the family level, rats in the Glu group had a relatively higher abundance of Peptostreptococcaceae and rats in the Fru group had a relatively higher abundance of Bacteroidaceae. Moreover, the proportions of Peptostreptococcaceae romboutsia and Staphylococcus lentus in the Glu group were significantly higher than in the Fru group, while the proportions of Lachnospira; Lachnospiraceae blautia, Bacteroides and Cellulosilyticus in the Fru group were significantly higher than in the Glu group. The concentration of isobutyric acid was relatively lower in all the sugar treated groups than in the Con. A significant decrease in isobutyric acid was found on comparing the Fru group to the Con group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Fructose, glucose and sucrose made no significant changes on rats in body weight, blood indicators, organ index and bacterial diversity. Moreover, fructose can potentially attenuate fasting and postprandial blood-glucose increase, pancreas inflammation and liver-fat accumulation when compared to glucose in mild doses. The relative abundance of six kinds of bacterial genera was found significantly different between rats fed on fructose and glucose.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T23:26:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efaa170a258b4625b9c754e98f64363a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1654-661X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T23:26:30Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Swedish Nutrition Foundation
record_format Article
series Food & Nutrition Research
spelling doaj.art-efaa170a258b4625b9c754e98f64363a2022-12-21T19:23:24ZengSwedish Nutrition FoundationFood & Nutrition Research1654-661X2021-05-016511410.29219/fnr.v65.5589FNR-65-5589The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as controlGe Song0Wentao Qi1Yong Wang2Shaojie Pang3Yong Li4Institute of Grain Quality and Nutrition Research, Academy of National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaInstitute of Grain Quality and Nutrition Research, Academy of National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaInstitute of Grain Quality and Nutrition Research, Academy of National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaInstitute of Grain Quality and Nutrition Research, Academy of National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaAims: To study the metabolic effects of fructose, glucose and saccharose in a moderate dose by analyzing changes of blood indicators, pancreas inflammation, liver fat accumulation and intestinal microbiota in normal Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Subjects and methods: Six-week-old rats were assigned to four groups (n = 10), which were gavaged with normalsaline (Con), glucose dissolved in normal saline (Glu), saccharose-glucose dissolved in normal saline (Sac), and fructose dissolved in normal saline (Fru) for 20 weeks. Results: No significant differences in body weight and blood parameters including total cholesterol (TC), total triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), lipase (LPS) and free fatty acid (FFA) among the Con, Glu, Sac and the Fru group. The fructose can significantly (P < 0.05) decrease fasting and postprandial blood glucose increase compared to glucose, and the risk of pancreas inflammation and liver fat accumulation induced by fructose is lower than glucose in rats. We found there were no significant differences in intestinal microbial diversity. At the family level, rats in the Glu group had a relatively higher abundance of Peptostreptococcaceae and rats in the Fru group had a relatively higher abundance of Bacteroidaceae. Moreover, the proportions of Peptostreptococcaceae romboutsia and Staphylococcus lentus in the Glu group were significantly higher than in the Fru group, while the proportions of Lachnospira; Lachnospiraceae blautia, Bacteroides and Cellulosilyticus in the Fru group were significantly higher than in the Glu group. The concentration of isobutyric acid was relatively lower in all the sugar treated groups than in the Con. A significant decrease in isobutyric acid was found on comparing the Fru group to the Con group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Fructose, glucose and sucrose made no significant changes on rats in body weight, blood indicators, organ index and bacterial diversity. Moreover, fructose can potentially attenuate fasting and postprandial blood-glucose increase, pancreas inflammation and liver-fat accumulation when compared to glucose in mild doses. The relative abundance of six kinds of bacterial genera was found significantly different between rats fed on fructose and glucose.https://foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/5589/13351fructoseglucosesaccharosemild dosemetabolic effectintestinal micro biota
spellingShingle Ge Song
Wentao Qi
Yong Wang
Shaojie Pang
Yong Li
The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control
Food & Nutrition Research
fructose
glucose
saccharose
mild dose
metabolic effect
intestinal micro biota
title The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control
title_full The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control
title_fullStr The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control
title_full_unstemmed The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control
title_short The metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control
title_sort metabolic effect of fructose on normal rats in a mild dose with glucose and saccharose as control
topic fructose
glucose
saccharose
mild dose
metabolic effect
intestinal micro biota
url https://foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/5589/13351
work_keys_str_mv AT gesong themetaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT wentaoqi themetaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT yongwang themetaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT shaojiepang themetaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT yongli themetaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT gesong metaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT wentaoqi metaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT yongwang metaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT shaojiepang metaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol
AT yongli metaboliceffectoffructoseonnormalratsinamilddosewithglucoseandsaccharoseascontrol