Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation

BackgroundOccipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been investigated as a potential treatment for disabling headaches and has shown promise for disorders such as chronic migraine and cluster headache. Long term outcomes stratified by headache subtype have had limited exploration, and literature on outc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monique M. Montenegro, Narayan R. Kissoon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2023.1054764/full
_version_ 1797867282414698496
author Monique M. Montenegro
Narayan R. Kissoon
Narayan R. Kissoon
author_facet Monique M. Montenegro
Narayan R. Kissoon
Narayan R. Kissoon
author_sort Monique M. Montenegro
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundOccipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been investigated as a potential treatment for disabling headaches and has shown promise for disorders such as chronic migraine and cluster headache. Long term outcomes stratified by headache subtype have had limited exploration, and literature on outcomes of this neuromodulatory intervention spanning 2 or more years is scarce.MeasuresWe performed a narrative review on long term outcomes with ONS for treatment of headache disorders. We surveyed the available literature for studies that have outcomes for 24 months or greater to see if there is a habituation in response over time. Review of the literature revealed evidence in treatment of occipital neuralgia, chronic migraine, cluster headache, cervicogenic headache, short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNHA) and paroxysmal hemicrania. While the term “response” varied per individual study, a total of 17 studies showed outcomes in ONS with long term sustained responses (as defined per this review) in the majority of patients with specific headache types 177/311 (56%). Only 7 studies in total (3 cluster, 1 occipital neuralgia, 1 cervicogenic headache, 1 SUNHA, 1 paroxysmal hemicrania) provided both short-term and long-term responses up to 24 months to ONS. In cluster headache, the majority of patients (64%) were long term responders (as defined per this review) and only a minority of patients 12/62 (19%) had loss of efficacy (e.g., habituation). There was a high number 313/439 (71%) of adverse events per total number of patients in the studies including lead migration, requirements of revision surgery, allergy to surgical materials, infection and intolerable paresthesias.ConclusionsWith the evidence available, the response to ONS was sustained in the majority of patients with cluster headache with low rates of loss of efficacy in this patient population. There was a high percent of adverse events per number of patients in long term follow-up and likely related to the off-label use of leads typically used for spinal cord stimulation. Further longitudinal assessments of outcomes in occipital nerve stimulation with devices labelled for use in peripheral nerve stimulation are needed to evaluate the extent of habituation to treatment in headache.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:37:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-efacfea8634741218c85666dbc8b49cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-561X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:37:48Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pain Research
spelling doaj.art-efacfea8634741218c85666dbc8b49cc2023-03-20T05:16:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pain Research2673-561X2023-03-01410.3389/fpain.2023.10547641054764Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulationMonique M. Montenegro0Narayan R. Kissoon1Narayan R. Kissoon2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United StatesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United StatesBackgroundOccipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been investigated as a potential treatment for disabling headaches and has shown promise for disorders such as chronic migraine and cluster headache. Long term outcomes stratified by headache subtype have had limited exploration, and literature on outcomes of this neuromodulatory intervention spanning 2 or more years is scarce.MeasuresWe performed a narrative review on long term outcomes with ONS for treatment of headache disorders. We surveyed the available literature for studies that have outcomes for 24 months or greater to see if there is a habituation in response over time. Review of the literature revealed evidence in treatment of occipital neuralgia, chronic migraine, cluster headache, cervicogenic headache, short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNHA) and paroxysmal hemicrania. While the term “response” varied per individual study, a total of 17 studies showed outcomes in ONS with long term sustained responses (as defined per this review) in the majority of patients with specific headache types 177/311 (56%). Only 7 studies in total (3 cluster, 1 occipital neuralgia, 1 cervicogenic headache, 1 SUNHA, 1 paroxysmal hemicrania) provided both short-term and long-term responses up to 24 months to ONS. In cluster headache, the majority of patients (64%) were long term responders (as defined per this review) and only a minority of patients 12/62 (19%) had loss of efficacy (e.g., habituation). There was a high number 313/439 (71%) of adverse events per total number of patients in the studies including lead migration, requirements of revision surgery, allergy to surgical materials, infection and intolerable paresthesias.ConclusionsWith the evidence available, the response to ONS was sustained in the majority of patients with cluster headache with low rates of loss of efficacy in this patient population. There was a high percent of adverse events per number of patients in long term follow-up and likely related to the off-label use of leads typically used for spinal cord stimulation. Further longitudinal assessments of outcomes in occipital nerve stimulation with devices labelled for use in peripheral nerve stimulation are needed to evaluate the extent of habituation to treatment in headache.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2023.1054764/fulllong term outcomeshabituationoccipital nerve stimulationheadacheneuromodulation
spellingShingle Monique M. Montenegro
Narayan R. Kissoon
Narayan R. Kissoon
Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation
Frontiers in Pain Research
long term outcomes
habituation
occipital nerve stimulation
headache
neuromodulation
title Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation
title_full Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation
title_fullStr Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation
title_short Long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation
title_sort long term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation
topic long term outcomes
habituation
occipital nerve stimulation
headache
neuromodulation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2023.1054764/full
work_keys_str_mv AT moniquemmontenegro longtermoutcomesofoccipitalnervestimulation
AT narayanrkissoon longtermoutcomesofoccipitalnervestimulation
AT narayanrkissoon longtermoutcomesofoccipitalnervestimulation