Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Post-abortion contraceptive use in India is low and the use of modern methods of contraception is rare, especially in rural areas. This study primarily compares contraceptive use among women whose abortion outcome was assessed in-clinic with women who assessed their abortion outc...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2016-10-01
|
| Series: | BMC Public Health |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3726-1 |
| _version_ | 1819200323107946496 |
|---|---|
| author | Mandira Paul Sharad D. Iyengar Birgitta Essén Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson Kirti Iyengar Johan Bring Marie Klingberg-Allvin |
| author_facet | Mandira Paul Sharad D. Iyengar Birgitta Essén Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson Kirti Iyengar Johan Bring Marie Klingberg-Allvin |
| author_sort | Mandira Paul |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Post-abortion contraceptive use in India is low and the use of modern methods of contraception is rare, especially in rural areas. This study primarily compares contraceptive use among women whose abortion outcome was assessed in-clinic with women who assessed their abortion outcome at home, in a low-resource, primary health care setting. Moreover, it investigates how background characteristics and abortion service provision influences contraceptive use post-abortion. Methods A randomized controlled, non-inferiority, trial (RCT) compared clinic follow-up with home-assessment of abortion outcome at 2 weeks post-abortion. Additionally, contraceptive-use at 3 months post-abortion was investigated through a cross-sectional follow-up interview with a largely urban sub-sample of women from the RCT. Women seeking abortion with a gestational age of up to 9 weeks and who agreed to a 2-week follow-up were included (n = 731). Women with known contraindications to medical abortions, Hb < 85 mg/l and aged below 18 were excluded. Data were collected between April 2013 and August 2014 in six primary health-care clinics in Rajasthan. A computerised random number generator created the randomisation sequence (1:1) in blocks of six. Contraceptive use was measured at 2 weeks among women successfully followed-up (n = 623) and 3 months in the sub-set of women who were included if they were recruited at one of the urban study sites, owned a phone and agreed to a 3-month follow-up (n = 114). Results There were no differences between contraceptive use and continuation between study groups at 3 months (76 % clinic follow-up, 77 % home-assessment), however women in the clinic follow-up group were most likely to adopt a contraceptive method at 2 weeks (62 ± 12 %), while women in the home-assessment group were most likely to adopt a method after next menstruation (60 ± 13 %). Fifty-two per cent of women who initiated a method at 2 weeks chose the 3-month injection or the copper intrauterine device. Only 4 % of women preferred sterilization. Caste, educational attainment, or type of residence did not influence contraceptive use. Conclusions Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion will not change women’s opportunities to access contraception in a low-resource setting, if contraceptive services are provided as intra-abortion services as early as on day one. Women’s postabortion contraceptive use at 3 months is unlikely to be affected by mode of followup after medical abortion, also in a low-resource setting. Clinical guidelines need to encourage intra-abortion contraception, offering the full spectrum of evidence-based methods, especially long-acting reversible methods. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01827995 |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T03:30:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-efbd2a4610cf45c4be6544db2c051123 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2458 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T03:30:24Z |
| publishDate | 2016-10-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Public Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-efbd2a4610cf45c4be6544db2c0511232022-12-21T18:01:43ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582016-10-0116111310.1186/s12889-016-3726-1Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trialMandira Paul0Sharad D. Iyengar1Birgitta Essén2Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson3Kirti Iyengar4Johan Bring5Marie Klingberg-Allvin6Department of Women’s and Children’s health / International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Uppsala UniversityAction Research & Training for Health (ARTH)Department of Women’s and Children’s health / International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, WHO collaborating CentreAction Research & Training for Health (ARTH)StatisticonStatisticonAbstract Background Post-abortion contraceptive use in India is low and the use of modern methods of contraception is rare, especially in rural areas. This study primarily compares contraceptive use among women whose abortion outcome was assessed in-clinic with women who assessed their abortion outcome at home, in a low-resource, primary health care setting. Moreover, it investigates how background characteristics and abortion service provision influences contraceptive use post-abortion. Methods A randomized controlled, non-inferiority, trial (RCT) compared clinic follow-up with home-assessment of abortion outcome at 2 weeks post-abortion. Additionally, contraceptive-use at 3 months post-abortion was investigated through a cross-sectional follow-up interview with a largely urban sub-sample of women from the RCT. Women seeking abortion with a gestational age of up to 9 weeks and who agreed to a 2-week follow-up were included (n = 731). Women with known contraindications to medical abortions, Hb < 85 mg/l and aged below 18 were excluded. Data were collected between April 2013 and August 2014 in six primary health-care clinics in Rajasthan. A computerised random number generator created the randomisation sequence (1:1) in blocks of six. Contraceptive use was measured at 2 weeks among women successfully followed-up (n = 623) and 3 months in the sub-set of women who were included if they were recruited at one of the urban study sites, owned a phone and agreed to a 3-month follow-up (n = 114). Results There were no differences between contraceptive use and continuation between study groups at 3 months (76 % clinic follow-up, 77 % home-assessment), however women in the clinic follow-up group were most likely to adopt a contraceptive method at 2 weeks (62 ± 12 %), while women in the home-assessment group were most likely to adopt a method after next menstruation (60 ± 13 %). Fifty-two per cent of women who initiated a method at 2 weeks chose the 3-month injection or the copper intrauterine device. Only 4 % of women preferred sterilization. Caste, educational attainment, or type of residence did not influence contraceptive use. Conclusions Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion will not change women’s opportunities to access contraception in a low-resource setting, if contraceptive services are provided as intra-abortion services as early as on day one. Women’s postabortion contraceptive use at 3 months is unlikely to be affected by mode of followup after medical abortion, also in a low-resource setting. Clinical guidelines need to encourage intra-abortion contraception, offering the full spectrum of evidence-based methods, especially long-acting reversible methods. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01827995http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3726-1 |
| spellingShingle | Mandira Paul Sharad D. Iyengar Birgitta Essén Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson Kirti Iyengar Johan Bring Marie Klingberg-Allvin Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial BMC Public Health |
| title | Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
| title_full | Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
| title_fullStr | Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
| title_short | Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
| title_sort | does mode of follow up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low resource setting secondary outcome analysis of a non inferiority randomized controlled trial |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3726-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mandirapaul doesmodeoffollowupinfluencecontraceptiveuseaftermedicalabortioninalowresourcesettingsecondaryoutcomeanalysisofanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sharaddiyengar doesmodeoffollowupinfluencecontraceptiveuseaftermedicalabortioninalowresourcesettingsecondaryoutcomeanalysisofanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT birgittaessen doesmodeoffollowupinfluencecontraceptiveuseaftermedicalabortioninalowresourcesettingsecondaryoutcomeanalysisofanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kristinagemzelldanielsson doesmodeoffollowupinfluencecontraceptiveuseaftermedicalabortioninalowresourcesettingsecondaryoutcomeanalysisofanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kirtiiyengar doesmodeoffollowupinfluencecontraceptiveuseaftermedicalabortioninalowresourcesettingsecondaryoutcomeanalysisofanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT johanbring doesmodeoffollowupinfluencecontraceptiveuseaftermedicalabortioninalowresourcesettingsecondaryoutcomeanalysisofanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marieklingbergallvin doesmodeoffollowupinfluencecontraceptiveuseaftermedicalabortioninalowresourcesettingsecondaryoutcomeanalysisofanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial |